Crives wrote:?s=21
Idk man, looks like empty state to me.
Moderators: bwgood77, Dirk, Domejandro, zimpy27, ken6199, cupcakesnake, infinite11285, KingDavid, bisme37, Clav
Crives wrote:?s=21
LV-Suns wrote:Crives wrote:?s=21
Idk man, looks like empty state to me.
Crives wrote:LV-Suns wrote:Crives wrote:?s=21
Idk man, looks like empty state to me.
IDK... should have went 15-0... 12-3 is just so empty. Hard to argue with the 32 posters here who think Book is empty stats leader.
Not when you are a defensive sieve and have a lot of turnovers. Plus he jack's up a lot of shots he shouldn't, he could be even more efficient. All he cares about is his stats and then going home to that ball groupie that pretty much every player has had a turn with.MikeM wrote:Empty stats ALWAYS referred to a guy with huge counting stats but no efficiency.
You cannot have empty stats if you are scoring efficiently on high volume. That is the definition of being EFFECTIVE.
Kings4win wrote:Not when you are a defensive sieve and have a lot of turnovers. Plus he jack's up a lot of shots he shouldn't, he could be even more efficient. All he cares about is his stats and then going home to that ball groupie that pretty much every player has had a turn with.MikeM wrote:Empty stats ALWAYS referred to a guy with huge counting stats but no efficiency.
You cannot have empty stats if you are scoring efficiently on high volume. That is the definition of being EFFECTIVE.
Kings4win wrote:Not when you are a defensive sieve and have a lot of turnovers. Plus he jack's up a lot of shots he shouldn't, he could be even more efficient. All he cares about is his stats and then going home to that ball groupie that pretty much every player has had a turn with.MikeM wrote:Empty stats ALWAYS referred to a guy with huge counting stats but no efficiency.
You cannot have empty stats if you are scoring efficiently on high volume. That is the definition of being EFFECTIVE.
You are comparing to him a player who can't shoot so I'm not sure how that's anything to gloat aboutYourCellarDoor wrote:Kings4win wrote:Not when you are a defensive sieve and have a lot of turnovers. Plus he jack's up a lot of shots he shouldn't, he could be even more efficient. All he cares about is his stats and then going home to that ball groupie that pretty much every player has had a turn with.MikeM wrote:Empty stats ALWAYS referred to a guy with huge counting stats but no efficiency.
You cannot have empty stats if you are scoring efficiently on high volume. That is the definition of being EFFECTIVE.
better ts% than giannis last year but that doesn't matter because he "could be even more efficient" lmfao. he's 1A/1B on the team with the 4th best record in the league rn and you're still trying to hold on to him only caring about his stats... it's embarrassing bro. ship has sailed on this one.
Ah the old do you watch basketball, I am higher than thou lol. Yes and he's finally in a position to win because he has players around him who compliment him and are more impactful on both ends. Booker is like a Kevin Martin with better passing. It's nothing to write home about. Stop gloating.Crives wrote:Kings4win wrote:Not when you are a defensive sieve and have a lot of turnovers. Plus he jack's up a lot of shots he shouldn't, he could be even more efficient. All he cares about is his stats and then going home to that ball groupie that pretty much every player has had a turn with.MikeM wrote:Empty stats ALWAYS referred to a guy with huge counting stats but no efficiency.
You cannot have empty stats if you are scoring efficiently on high volume. That is the definition of being EFFECTIVE.
Do you watch Basketball? After a slow start after odd offseason Booker was #36 in turnovers in Feb.
Kings4win wrote:Ah the old do you watch basketball, I am higher than thou lol. Yes and he's finally in a position to win because he has players around him who compliment him and are more impactful on both ends. Booker is like a Kevin Martin with better passing. It's nothing to write home about. Stop gloating.Crives wrote:Kings4win wrote:Not when you are a defensive sieve and have a lot of turnovers. Plus he jack's up a lot of shots he shouldn't, he could be even more efficient. All he cares about is his stats and then going home to that ball groupie that pretty much every player has had a turn with.
Do you watch Basketball? After a slow start after odd offseason Booker was #36 in turnovers in Feb.
ShotCreator wrote:Booker just isn’t that good. His stats aren’t even that good.
Chris Paul is better on both ends.
Guys like Saric, Bridges, Payne and Crowder are more valuable than just him easily.
Sigh. Booker is simply leading scorer so he’ll get hella overrated. I didn’t even notice this until he won WC POTM somehow. Good lord.
IG2 wrote:GOAT timing by OP
Phx were already playing well and then played even better after his ejection.
Mr Puddles wrote:IG2 wrote:GOAT timing by OP
Phx were already playing well and then played even better after his ejection.
The Suns were +13 with Booker on the floor, and end up winning the game by 10. What kind of advanced math did you apply to come to the conclusion that the Suns were better without Booker on the floor tonight?