ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM

Moderators: TrueLAfan, og15

RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#101 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:57 am

MartinToVaught wrote:
RingColluder wrote:He was dealing with the loss of a family member.

I understand that, and of course it's hard to play under those circumstances.

On the other hand, being a poor defender, poor rebounder and mediocre-at-best player on offense is never a good mix in the playoffs regardless of the circumstances.


Which makes Zu what? He's a poor defender, zero hands, and a very very invisible offensive player consistently.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#102 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 10:01 am

Clemenza wrote:The Utah Jazz can't close games for sh*t either against quality opponents so we're not the only ones trying to iron out the kinks


We should be comparing ourselves to the Lakers or Nets, not the 2nd tier yet to prove anything teams with the supposed talent of PG and the actual talent of Kawhi.

Someone Brought up Kawhi leaving, but I Would tell Kawhi to leave this team if we're a first round exit. We are capped out and reliant on arguably the worst max player in the league PG.


Not to mention... WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF YEARS FOR KAWHI AND PG's "PRIME".

I truly believe last year was "The year" to steal a ring, but Doc had to **** it up with his lack of adjustments in the Denver series.

This is arguably the last real year we have to win. I'm not counting on Kawhi's knees to hold up nor Morris/Ibaka etc with Bev and Lou already breaking down and PG dealing with a new injury every year. Not every player is LeBron.

And who can forget Luke Kennard at the old age of 24 already dealing with persistent knee issues in his short career.

Who exactly do you feel confident going up against in round 1? Portland, Denver, Dallas, Golden State are all going to be very tough series to win looking at how PG plays in primetime games. Please make a trade and give us something to hope for :noway: :noway:

#FIRELAWRENCEFRANK
NickP
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,322
And1: 963
Joined: Aug 20, 2020
 

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#103 » by NickP » Thu Mar 4, 2021 2:52 pm

esqtvd wrote:
madmaxmedia wrote:If you look at past Clipper draftees, I think scouting has been more to blame than player development.
If you look at past Clipper veteran acquisitions, we've usually had to take chances on guys with mixed prospects due to cap reasons, with mixed results.

I think on the whole looking at the current FO, we've made a couple of good to great headliner moves (yay!), but very mixed on the smaller moves and draft picks (boo!) The big moves got us Kawhi and PG, but better complementary moves would have really filled out our roster better. That's why we're only a serious playoff contender, and not on a championship favorite/co-favorite level. Improving a team that already has 2 stars (and 2 star contracts) can be like trying to squeeze water from a rock, but that's just what it takes to win a title.

The big question really, is this current level team enough to get Kawhi to re-sign? (I'm assuming for the moment that PG will stay) Because if we lose him, our payroll and assets will really limit our ability to replace him to a meaningful degree.



I make it 90% but I don't take it for granted. Kawhi could also not opt out of the last year on his contract, or opt out and sign a shorter-term contract to see how it goes. He's a 'leave your options open' kind of guy.

I would not count out GSW. It's only 90 minutes by plane from San Diego and Steph Curry is the clutch co-star that Paul George ain't.

Take a break from your Kawhi bolting theories man.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,424
And1: 34,340
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#104 » by og15 » Thu Mar 4, 2021 6:12 pm

RingColluder wrote:
Clemenza wrote:The Utah Jazz can't close games for sh*t either against quality opponents so we're not the only ones trying to iron out the kinks


We should be comparing ourselves to the Lakers or Nets, not the 2nd tier yet to prove anything teams with the supposed talent of PG and the actual talent of Kawhi.

Someone Brought up Kawhi leaving, but I Would tell Kawhi to leave this team if we're a first round exit. We are capped out and reliant on arguably the worst max player in the league PG.


Not to mention... WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF YEARS FOR KAWHI AND PG's "PRIME".

I truly believe last year was "The year" to steal a ring, but Doc had to **** it up with his lack of adjustments in the Denver series.

This is arguably the last real year we have to win. I'm not counting on Kawhi's knees to hold up nor Morris/Ibaka etc with Bev and Lou already breaking down and PG dealing with a new injury every year. Not every player is LeBron.

And who can forget Luke Kennard at the old age of 24 already dealing with persistent knee issues in his short career.

Who exactly do you feel confident going up against in round 1? Portland, Denver, Dallas, Golden State are all going to be very tough series to win looking at how PG plays in primetime games. Please make a trade and give us something to hope for :noway: :noway:

#FIRELAWRENCEFRANK

The worst max player in the league? lol

Alternate reality? What happened to Westbrook, Wall, etc?
TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,959
And1: 10,700
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#105 » by TheNewEra » Thu Mar 4, 2021 6:15 pm

RingColluder wrote:
MartinToVaught wrote:
RingColluder wrote:

I know you have never been a Trez fan, but Zu who you constantly wanted to play more minutes has looked awful this season. Harrell could at least help our post game and added a new element to our stillted offense and helped Lou Williams contribute as well better than he has lately. I'd argue our paint defense looks even worse ow than last year and we have 0 reliability from the 2nd team this season thanks to Kennard doing nothing and role players like Reggie inconsistent. Trez for 2 years 18 was a steal, the bad attitude stuff is totally overblown given it looks like this team will fall even sooner than last year's team.

IN many ways it appears Zu either has confidence issues or his stats and game were overinflated playing w the starters on a more daily basis last season. Who is going to trade for him? No one.

Even you would have to say he's regressed. The commentators spent all of the Bucks game talking about Ty Lue's comments towards Zur regarding dunks and he mangled 3 of them. His hands are garbage and he is not doing enough on the defensive end to offset that.

How did Trez's post game work out in the playoffs? Let's not pretend like he was some superstar on offense, even though he seems to think he is. I remember times when he would wave off Kawhi and PG to run isos for himself. He also wasn't rebounding or playing defense.

If you've watched Trez on the Lakers, you'd notice that he warms the bench in fourth quarters against teams with good big men. Unlike Doc, Vogel's rotations are based on merit, not favoritism. Trez just isn't that good and isn't the answer for any of this team's issues. We need a legit point guard and a rim protector.

As I've been saying since last season, the mistake wasn't moving on from Trez - the mistake was not trading him while we had the chance.


He was dealing with the loss of a family member. A much more understandable excuse than getting chicken wings at a strip club.

Again you fail to mention Zu whatsoever. He has REGRESSED. Weren't there people here talking about him being a potential All Star here last year LMAO. We won't even come close to a game 7 in round 2 with this current roster. You're telling me we'd be worse or the same Trez on our bench right now? Please.

2 years 18 million is a joke of a contract. We should have kept him at that levels and Ty Lue would have figured out the rest.

Do you see how hard the lakers have to work to hide Trez defensively? He’s a terrible defender and locker room risk. Zu has and will continue to be the option and frankly player with his development on both ends.

Being delusional won’t make your point true regardless of Zu scores or not from second chance opportunities to on and off ball screening he impacts the game.

So please stop with these pointless rants
Clemenza
Head Coach
Posts: 6,025
And1: 5,164
Joined: Jan 21, 2013
Location: California
   

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#106 » by Clemenza » Thu Mar 4, 2021 7:20 pm

RingColluder wrote:
Clemenza wrote:The Utah Jazz can't close games for sh*t either against quality opponents so we're not the only ones trying to iron out the kinks


We should be comparing ourselves to the Lakers or Nets, not the 2nd tier yet to prove anything teams with the supposed talent of PG and the actual talent of Kawhi.

Someone Brought up Kawhi leaving, but I Would tell Kawhi to leave this team if we're a first round exit. We are capped out and reliant on arguably the worst max player in the league PG.


Not to mention... WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF YEARS FOR KAWHI AND PG's "PRIME".

I truly believe last year was "The year" to steal a ring, but Doc had to **** it up with his lack of adjustments in the Denver series.

This is arguably the last real year we have to win. I'm not counting on Kawhi's knees to hold up nor Morris/Ibaka etc with Bev and Lou already breaking down and PG dealing with a new injury every year. Not every player is LeBron.

And who can forget Luke Kennard at the old age of 24 already dealing with persistent knee issues in his short career.

Who exactly do you feel confident going up against in round 1? Portland, Denver, Dallas, Golden State are all going to be very tough series to win looking at how PG plays in primetime games. Please make a trade and give us something to hope for :noway: :noway:

#FIRELAWRENCEFRANK

Nets got the stars but they haven't won sh*t yet. Harden has the same post season demons as PG and Durant and Kyrie stay injured. Lakers caught huge break in the bubble as us and teams like the Bucks and Celtics choked. Bron might be gassed come playoff time and AD is a question mark for the rest of the season. Most definitely we need a WCF/Finals appearance before these guys get older and more injury prone. I'm just bringing out how we're not the only team that has to work some sh*t out even though the media makes like we're the only ones and loves to hype teams like the Suns and Jazz over us. And PG is far from the worst max player out there. I want deep playoff run and a championship ring for the team but if something happens and Kawhi bolts then f*ck it is what it is. Its literally out of our hands.

But when everybody talks that Kawhi could leave sh*t just do us all a favor and let us know what warm climate city he's going to, who has max money for him, who's down for his load management, who's pushing their other stars to the background to run the offense through Kawhi, who's giving him say in the front office,who's sitting down with his Uncle Dennis for his list of demands, etc. etc. etc. If he was a no frills pack his bags and bolt to the next town type star like a Kevin Durant or CP3 it would be a different story. But we're talking about Kawhi here.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,189
And1: 4,864
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#107 » by esqtvd » Thu Mar 4, 2021 7:55 pm

Clemenza wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
madmaxmedia wrote:If you look at past Clipper draftees, I think scouting has been more to blame than player development.
If you look at past Clipper veteran acquisitions, we've usually had to take chances on guys with mixed prospects due to cap reasons, with mixed results.

I think on the whole looking at the current FO, we've made a couple of good to great headliner moves (yay!), but very mixed on the smaller moves and draft picks (boo!) The big moves got us Kawhi and PG, but better complementary moves would have really filled out our roster better. That's why we're only a serious playoff contender, and not on a championship favorite/co-favorite level. Improving a team that already has 2 stars (and 2 star contracts) can be like trying to squeeze water from a rock, but that's just what it takes to win a title.

The big question really, is this current level team enough to get Kawhi to re-sign? (I'm assuming for the moment that PG will stay) Because if we lose him, our payroll and assets will really limit our ability to replace him to a meaningful degree.



I make it 90% but I don't take it for granted. Kawhi could also not opt out of the last year on his contract, or opt out and sign a shorter-term contract to see how it goes. He's a 'leave your options open' kind of guy.

I would not count out GSW. It's only 90 minutes by plane from San Diego and Steph Curry is the clutch co-star that Paul George ain't.


Kawhi is going to have to lock down a longer term deal which will probably be his last big max deal career wise. Wouldn't be smart to do a short term deal with his chronic knee issues and his age creeping up. Really only iron man Bron can do that type of maneuver. And of course Steph Curry the 3x champion 2x MVP of the league would be the ultimate co-star.. it goes without saying. Not sure how the Warriors would be able to afford Kawhi as well as the fact that he would have to change his game in Golden State. That iso-hold the ball up is not flying up there



Anyone else but Kawhi and I'd agree. PG grabbed the cash with no second thoughts. Blake took the cash without a no-trade clause and ended up in NBA Siberia. But Kawhi marches to his own drummer, and I say that with respect and admiration. He has never once verbally indicated he will definitely re-sign. I pay more attention to what people DONT say than what they do say and he's quite pointedly leaving his options open--just like he did signing here with an opt-out after 2 years instead of a long-term supermax.

Kawhi only turns 30 in June and has already made $150 million playing in the NBA. He surely does not want to end up like Blake Griffin.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#108 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 8:05 pm

og15 wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
Clemenza wrote:The Utah Jazz can't close games for sh*t either against quality opponents so we're not the only ones trying to iron out the kinks


We should be comparing ourselves to the Lakers or Nets, not the 2nd tier yet to prove anything teams with the supposed talent of PG and the actual talent of Kawhi.

Someone Brought up Kawhi leaving, but I Would tell Kawhi to leave this team if we're a first round exit. We are capped out and reliant on arguably the worst max player in the league PG.


Not to mention... WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF YEARS FOR KAWHI AND PG's "PRIME".

I truly believe last year was "The year" to steal a ring, but Doc had to **** it up with his lack of adjustments in the Denver series.

This is arguably the last real year we have to win. I'm not counting on Kawhi's knees to hold up nor Morris/Ibaka etc with Bev and Lou already breaking down and PG dealing with a new injury every year. Not every player is LeBron.

And who can forget Luke Kennard at the old age of 24 already dealing with persistent knee issues in his short career.

Who exactly do you feel confident going up against in round 1? Portland, Denver, Dallas, Golden State are all going to be very tough series to win looking at how PG plays in primetime games. Please make a trade and give us something to hope for :noway: :noway:

#FIRELAWRENCEFRANK

The worst max player in the league? lol

Alternate reality? What happened to Westbrook, Wall, etc?


No one takes either of them seriously and they are both on lottery teams.

We're supposed to be a championship level team and Kawhi picked PG as his max guy. So yes, he absolutely is for the standard we're looking at.

If LeBron picked Karl Anthony Towns Id say the same thing
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#109 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 8:07 pm

TheNewEra wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
MartinToVaught wrote:How did Trez's post game work out in the playoffs? Let's not pretend like he was some superstar on offense, even though he seems to think he is. I remember times when he would wave off Kawhi and PG to run isos for himself. He also wasn't rebounding or playing defense.

If you've watched Trez on the Lakers, you'd notice that he warms the bench in fourth quarters against teams with good big men. Unlike Doc, Vogel's rotations are based on merit, not favoritism. Trez just isn't that good and isn't the answer for any of this team's issues. We need a legit point guard and a rim protector.

As I've been saying since last season, the mistake wasn't moving on from Trez - the mistake was not trading him while we had the chance.


He was dealing with the loss of a family member. A much more understandable excuse than getting chicken wings at a strip club.

Again you fail to mention Zu whatsoever. He has REGRESSED. Weren't there people here talking about him being a potential All Star here last year LMAO. We won't even come close to a game 7 in round 2 with this current roster. You're telling me we'd be worse or the same Trez on our bench right now? Please.

2 years 18 million is a joke of a contract. We should have kept him at that levels and Ty Lue would have figured out the rest.

Do you see how hard the lakers have to work to hide Trez defensively? He’s a terrible defender and locker room risk. Zu has and will continue to be the option and frankly player with his development on both ends.

Being delusional won’t make your point true regardless of Zu scores or not from second chance opportunities to on and off ball screening he impacts the game.

So please stop with these pointless rants


This is utterly laughable. He has REGRESSED. The only thing delusional is some of the posters unwillingness to admit how wrong they were about him. He should have stepped up this season without Trez and instead he's getting exposed.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#110 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 8:09 pm

Clemenza wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
Clemenza wrote:The Utah Jazz can't close games for sh*t either against quality opponents so we're not the only ones trying to iron out the kinks


We should be comparing ourselves to the Lakers or Nets, not the 2nd tier yet to prove anything teams with the supposed talent of PG and the actual talent of Kawhi.

Someone Brought up Kawhi leaving, but I Would tell Kawhi to leave this team if we're a first round exit. We are capped out and reliant on arguably the worst max player in the league PG.


Not to mention... WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF YEARS FOR KAWHI AND PG's "PRIME".

I truly believe last year was "The year" to steal a ring, but Doc had to **** it up with his lack of adjustments in the Denver series.

This is arguably the last real year we have to win. I'm not counting on Kawhi's knees to hold up nor Morris/Ibaka etc with Bev and Lou already breaking down and PG dealing with a new injury every year. Not every player is LeBron.

And who can forget Luke Kennard at the old age of 24 already dealing with persistent knee issues in his short career.

Who exactly do you feel confident going up against in round 1? Portland, Denver, Dallas, Golden State are all going to be very tough series to win looking at how PG plays in primetime games. Please make a trade and give us something to hope for :noway: :noway:

#FIRELAWRENCEFRANK

Nets got the stars but they haven't won sh*t yet. Harden has the same post season demons as PG and Durant and Kyrie stay injured. Lakers caught huge break in the bubble as us and teams like the Bucks and Celtics choked. Bron might be gassed come playoff time and AD is a question mark for the rest of the season. Most definitely we need a WCF/Finals appearance before these guys get older and more injury prone. I'm just bringing out how we're not the only team that has to work some sh*t out even though the media makes like we're the only ones and loves to hype teams like the Suns and Jazz over us. And PG is far from the worst max player out there. I want deep playoff run and a championship ring for the team but if something happens and Kawhi bolts then f*ck it is what it is. Its literally out of our hands.

But when everybody talks that Kawhi could leave sh*t just do us all a favor and let us know what warm climate city he's going to, who has max money for him, who's down for his load management, who's pushing their other stars to the background to run the offense through Kawhi, who's giving him say in the front office,who's sitting down with his Uncle Dennis for his list of demands, etc. etc. etc. If he was a no frills pack his bags and bolt to the next town type star like a Kevin Durant or CP3 it would be a different story. But we're talking about Kawhi here.


Lots of excuses here, ending with "if Kawhi bolts it is what it is". HELL. NO. We need to do whatever it takes to keep Kawhi here with virtually 0 draft picks and 0 cap space. We will be the laughing stock of the league for the next 5 years without a deep playoff run.

I'd say a WCF matchup that goes 6-7 is at minimum our level for even supposed "success". I'm from the school of championship of bust given the supposed talent on this team but apparently people's standards here are longer.

My guess is Kawhi signs a 1 + 1 again and reassess or demands a trade if things go completely haywire.
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,612
And1: 7,536
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#111 » by madmaxmedia » Thu Mar 4, 2021 8:23 pm

I think a 1+1 is quite possible, I agree he is very much his own dude and may not jump at job security over flexibility (although money is money.) I also don't think he's a ring chaser type. If I had to guess, the two most important factors for him would be comfort factor (org, teammates, environment) and at least reasonable shot at a championship. We don't have to win a title for him to stay, especially if he signs a shorter contract.

Getting into at least a competitive WCF feels like the low bar for success this season to me too. Losing in the 1st or 2nd round would be a disaster. Getting beat down in the WCF at least would defeat the 2nd round curse, but wouldn't bode well at all for future seasons- even if Kawhi stays.

I do think Paul George is a good contract for us. He's not in that tier of guys would would earn double the max in a truly open market, but he is worth a max contract. Whether we should have traded for him or could have gone after a different guy is a different question, but I have no problems with his contract.
Clemenza
Head Coach
Posts: 6,025
And1: 5,164
Joined: Jan 21, 2013
Location: California
   

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#112 » by Clemenza » Thu Mar 4, 2021 8:36 pm

RingColluder wrote:
Clemenza wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
We should be comparing ourselves to the Lakers or Nets, not the 2nd tier yet to prove anything teams with the supposed talent of PG and the actual talent of Kawhi.

Someone Brought up Kawhi leaving, but I Would tell Kawhi to leave this team if we're a first round exit. We are capped out and reliant on arguably the worst max player in the league PG.


Not to mention... WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF YEARS FOR KAWHI AND PG's "PRIME".

I truly believe last year was "The year" to steal a ring, but Doc had to **** it up with his lack of adjustments in the Denver series.

This is arguably the last real year we have to win. I'm not counting on Kawhi's knees to hold up nor Morris/Ibaka etc with Bev and Lou already breaking down and PG dealing with a new injury every year. Not every player is LeBron.

And who can forget Luke Kennard at the old age of 24 already dealing with persistent knee issues in his short career.

Who exactly do you feel confident going up against in round 1? Portland, Denver, Dallas, Golden State are all going to be very tough series to win looking at how PG plays in primetime games. Please make a trade and give us something to hope for :noway: :noway:

#FIRELAWRENCEFRANK

Nets got the stars but they haven't won sh*t yet. Harden has the same post season demons as PG and Durant and Kyrie stay injured. Lakers caught huge break in the bubble as us and teams like the Bucks and Celtics choked. Bron might be gassed come playoff time and AD is a question mark for the rest of the season. Most definitely we need a WCF/Finals appearance before these guys get older and more injury prone. I'm just bringing out how we're not the only team that has to work some sh*t out even though the media makes like we're the only ones and loves to hype teams like the Suns and Jazz over us. And PG is far from the worst max player out there. I want deep playoff run and a championship ring for the team but if something happens and Kawhi bolts then f*ck it is what it is. Its literally out of our hands.

But when everybody talks that Kawhi could leave sh*t just do us all a favor and let us know what warm climate city he's going to, who has max money for him, who's down for his load management, who's pushing their other stars to the background to run the offense through Kawhi, who's giving him say in the front office,who's sitting down with his Uncle Dennis for his list of demands, etc. etc. etc. If he was a no frills pack his bags and bolt to the next town type star like a Kevin Durant or CP3 it would be a different story. But we're talking about Kawhi here.


Lots of excuses here, ending with "if Kawhi bolts it is what it is". HELL. NO. We need to do whatever it takes to keep Kawhi here with virtually 0 draft picks and 0 cap space. We will be the laughing stock of the league for the next 5 years without a deep playoff run.

I'd say a WCF matchup that goes 6-7 is at minimum our level for even supposed "success". I'm from the school of championship of bust given the supposed talent on this team but apparently people's standards here are longer.

My guess is Kawhi signs a 1 + 1 again and reassess or demands a trade if things go completely haywire.

I agree we need to keep Kawhi here no question but that's up to the front office and coaching staff to make it work. Me or you typing on our keyboards doesn't move the needle in either direction as to whether he stays or leaves. If Kawhi leaves, of course I'll be pissed off asf, but I'll still be a Clipper fan and will still have to go about my day to day life. Its like the outsider who started the "trade proposal thread" on here last week.. if you didn't agree with him then he said "ok now you guys are going to lose in the first or second round then" as if we're part of the front office and we're f*cking the future of the team off. And yes we need to win now!
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,765
And1: 17,821
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#113 » by MartinToVaught » Thu Mar 4, 2021 8:55 pm

RingColluder wrote:This is utterly laughable. He has REGRESSED. The only thing delusional is some of the posters unwillingness to admit how wrong they were about him. He should have stepped up this season without Trez and instead he's getting exposed.

What were we wrong about? We 100% would have won the Denver series last season if Zu simply got all of Trez's minutes. Nothing Zu does this year changes that.

The biggest problems the Clippers have right now are that we need a point guard and a rim protector. Trez addresses none of those issues. The idea that we'd be a substantially better team right now with Trez has no basis in reality, which is why your only argument is to deflect to Zu's recent struggles (as if that somehow makes Trez a good defender).
Image
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,612
And1: 7,536
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#114 » by madmaxmedia » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:10 pm

Zu is no All Star, but he is on a reasonable contract for what he can do.

The debate about Trezz heading into free agency was how much would he be worth offering? He ended up with a reasonably team-friendly deal, but for us the answer turned out to be zero anyway, when Ibaka became available and was a better fit.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#115 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:11 pm

MartinToVaught wrote:
RingColluder wrote:This is utterly laughable. He has REGRESSED. The only thing delusional is some of the posters unwillingness to admit how wrong they were about him. He should have stepped up this season without Trez and instead he's getting exposed.

What were we wrong about? We 100% would have won the Denver series last season if Zu simply got all of Trez's minutes. Nothing Zu does this year changes that.

The biggest problems the Clippers have right now are that we need a point guard and a rim protector. Trez addresses none of those issues. The idea that we'd be a substantially better team right now with Trez has no basis in reality, which is why your only argument is to deflect to Zu's recent struggles (as if that somehow makes Trez a good defender).


Had Doc changed a few things (not just zu to Harrell which I agree with was needed that series) we win it. Not just that.

You still continue to refuse to talk about Zu at all this year. He has regressed and it has been awful. The only reason he even looked good last year was because he played with the starters. You talk about deflecting when YOU are the one who has not said a word about how bad he looks with the 2nd team.

Anything would improve the Clippers right now. Our 2nd team is a mess and Trez would have helped there. Yes we also need a PG but when our only big is inept on offense and clanks easy post shots and has hands of stone, it affects the rest of the team. Why is Lou regressing too? He was 2nd in 6th man of the year and looks like a shell of himself without Trez. HE also opens up the offense for Morris or whoever PG/Kawhi is in too.

There's no point to arguing it now I'm just calling out your comments pretending that Zu was some victimized future all star when he is the furthest thing from it. Like Kennard we are STUCK WITH HIM so I hope for both of our sakes you are right and I am wrong about his supposed potential.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#116 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:15 pm

madmaxmedia wrote:Zu is no All Star, but he is on a reasonable contract for what he can do.

The debate about Trezz heading into free agency was how much would he be worth offering? He ended up with a reasonably team-friendly deal, but for us the answer turned out to be zero anyway, when Ibaka became available and was a better fit.


He's on a reasonable contract but for his minutes, he has not delivering what is needed. And talking about a reasonable contract, 9 million for 2 years for Trez would have been magnificent. Getting rid of the Zu deal (for something minor back in return) and getting Harrell AND Ibaka was the answer. Who cares what egotistical prima donna PG wants, Lue will make it work. Trez was hurt the Clippers didn't offer him a deal.

Instead we're in this no mans land with no clear identity for this team other than iso's and paint issues with still no legitimate PG ("playmaker Kennard" according to our idiotic GM). We were better off having a massive team that matches up well with the Lakers in a potential series than our disastrous 3 guard lineups.

Again, these are all regrets. Hopefully today is an easy win and we can assess the roster at ASB.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#117 » by RingColluder » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:19 pm

2:12 ;t=210s

"Increase our playmaking"

You're telling me this man Frank gets paid to watch and scout games and after watching Kennard last season decided HE was the option at playmaker?!?

I've talked to Pistons fans who aren't surprised by his lack of confidence, inconsistent shooting, and fragile knees. 4 years 64 million (Same deal as Morris) before he even plays a game?! This is a joke! He is sabotaging this team on purpose!!!

He gets paid $500,000 a game to sit on his ass and cheerlead.

#FIRELAWRENCEFRANK
clipperlover
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,330
And1: 1,155
Joined: Sep 10, 2019

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#118 » by clipperlover » Thu Mar 4, 2021 9:45 pm

esqtvd wrote:
clipperlover wrote:
esqtvd wrote:[Sterling would not eat Cunningham's contract so we could keep Ingles.]


FAKE NEWS that Doc was spouting and didn't get called out on. Joe Ingles never came to the Clippers until Oct 2014 (2014-2015 pre-season). Ballmer was the owner at that time. Doc lied to the media about this when questioned about why the Clippers didn't keep Ingles. Doc blamed it on prior ownership.


You're right about the dates. Doc didn't mention Sterling by name.

Irrelevant to the point being discussed here, however, which was Doc as coach not GM. And Ingles was a Clipper for only a few weeks and technically never was a Clipper, just a non-roster camp invitee. The point here is that no player languished here and went on to success with another organization. Bullock is the only possible example and it's quite a weak one. He was still crap for several years and at his peak was only a marginal player. Plus he was traded for Austin Rivers, who contributed immediately.


Doc tried to pin the blame on Sterling when it was his decision. Here was his exact quote:
“I said it the day we released him that this was a bad decision and that we’re going to regret it,” he said. “Unfortunately I was working for someone who said we couldn’t eat a contract. We were begging to eat one contract and they said that will never happen and we had to let him go.”

Sorry, Doc, but that was your call. You had ALL the power AND just received a fat contract extension two months prior.

TVD, it is crap like that why people were more than happy to see the guy go. Nothing was ever his fault. With the Ingles comment, he just thought he could absolve himself of responsibility by blaming Sterling instead and people would just believe him.

https://clutchpoints.com/clippers-news-hc-doc-rivers-mistakenly-alludes-to-steve-ballmer-as-the-reason-why-los-angeles-let-joe-ingles-go/

https://www.sbnation.com/2017/4/24/15406152/joe-ingles-doc-rivers-history-clippers-jazz-playoffs

https://www.deseret.com/2019/1/17/20663550/los-angeles-clippers-rivers-still-laments-letting-joe-ingles-get-away-all-those-years-ago
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,189
And1: 4,864
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#119 » by esqtvd » Thu Mar 4, 2021 10:47 pm

clipperlover wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
clipperlover wrote:
FAKE NEWS that Doc was spouting and didn't get called out on. Joe Ingles never came to the Clippers until Oct 2014 (2014-2015 pre-season). Ballmer was the owner at that time. Doc lied to the media about this when questioned about why the Clippers didn't keep Ingles. Doc blamed it on prior ownership.


You're right about the dates. Doc didn't mention Sterling by name.

Irrelevant to the point being discussed here, however, which was Doc as coach not GM. And Ingles was a Clipper for only a few weeks and technically never was a Clipper, just a non-roster camp invitee. The point here is that no player languished here and went on to success with another organization. Bullock is the only possible example and it's quite a weak one. He was still crap for several years and at his peak was only a marginal player. Plus he was traded for Austin Rivers, who contributed immediately.


Doc tried to pin the blame on Sterling when it was his decision. Here was his exact quote:
“I said it the day we released him that this was a bad decision and that we’re going to regret it,” he said. “Unfortunately I was working for someone who said we couldn’t eat a contract. We were begging to eat one contract and they said that will never happen and we had to let him go.”

Sorry, Doc, but that was your call. You had ALL the power AND just received a fat contract extension two months prior.

TVD, it is crap like that why people were more than happy to see the guy go. Nothing was ever his fault. With the Ingles comment, he just thought he could absolve himself of responsibility by blaming Sterling instead and people would just believe him.

https://clutchpoints.com/clippers-news-hc-doc-rivers-mistakenly-alludes-to-steve-ballmer-as-the-reason-why-los-angeles-let-joe-ingles-go/

https://www.sbnation.com/2017/4/24/15406152/joe-ingles-doc-rivers-history-clippers-jazz-playoffs

https://www.deseret.com/2019/1/17/20663550/los-angeles-clippers-rivers-still-laments-letting-joe-ingles-get-away-all-those-years-ago




Didn't mention Sterling by name. You're probably right that he's CYAing but frankly I don't give a fig. It was 6 years ago, Ingles shot 25% in that preseason and is still only a marginal NBA starter and Doc is gone. The current FO drafting total bust Jerome Robinson at #13 and missing out on Porter and others is a bigger fail than anything from the Lob City era.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,765
And1: 17,821
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: Game 37 : Los Angeles Clippers (24-12) @ Boston Celtics (17-17) - 7:30PM 

Post#120 » by MartinToVaught » Thu Mar 4, 2021 11:11 pm

"Unfortunately I was working for someone who said we couldn't eat a contract."

It's really not hard to read between the lines and understand who he's referring to. Here's a hint: it's not the richest owner in pro sports.

You can dismiss Ingles as "marginal" all you want, but he would have made a big difference on those Lob City teams that were starved for NBA-caliber wing play. It was a big mistake by an incompetent coach pretending to be an even more incompetent GM.
Image

Return to Los Angeles Clippers