ImageImage

Fake Trade Thread #3

Moderators: yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam

OrlMagic05
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,915
And1: 1,103
Joined: Aug 01, 2014
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1201 » by OrlMagic05 » Tue Mar 9, 2021 3:49 pm

Soul Rebel wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
No. He is good, but that is what you give up for a surefire all-star in his prime. Vuc is 30 and a borderline all-star.


How about top 5 protected.


What do you think ORL would ask for Bamba + Fournier?


Fournier being an expiring i dont think will land us much, but Bamba has shown glimpses of being a good player, he just cant get out of Cliffords dog house for some reason. To me Bamba is still on that boarderline untouchable line because when he does play he is very efficient. I would love to see him actually play some meaningful minutes before trading him away unless the package was worth it.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,607
And1: 14,298
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1202 » by HornetJail » Tue Mar 9, 2021 4:12 pm

stinger14 wrote:...

hey I liked the trade you asked me about in PM, but it wouldn't let me reply to you for some reason, says your inbox isn't set up for receiving PMs. I'd leave ORL out of that though
investigate Adam Silver
stinger14
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 769
Joined: Jan 11, 2014
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1203 » by stinger14 » Tue Mar 9, 2021 4:16 pm

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
stinger14 wrote:...

hey I liked the trade you asked me about in PM, but it wouldn't let me reply to you for some reason, says your inbox isn't set up for receiving PMs. I'd leave ORL out of that though


You don't feel they would want expirings and picks? I felt GSW might be more inclined to trade Wiseman if they also got Vuc back.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,607
And1: 14,298
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1204 » by HornetJail » Tue Mar 9, 2021 4:19 pm

stinger14 wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
stinger14 wrote:...

hey I liked the trade you asked me about in PM, but it wouldn't let me reply to you for some reason, says your inbox isn't set up for receiving PMs. I'd leave ORL out of that though


You don't feel they would want expirings and picks? I felt GSW might be more inclined to trade Wiseman if they also got Vuc back.

no i think that sending the MIN pick is an overpay for Vuc. It's a bad value move. The pick is a potential gold ticket.
investigate Adam Silver
stinger14
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 769
Joined: Jan 11, 2014
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1205 » by stinger14 » Tue Mar 9, 2021 4:21 pm

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
stinger14 wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:hey I liked the trade you asked me about in PM, but it wouldn't let me reply to you for some reason, says your inbox isn't set up for receiving PMs. I'd leave ORL out of that though


You don't feel they would want expirings and picks? I felt GSW might be more inclined to trade Wiseman if they also got Vuc back.

no i think that sending the MIN pick is an overpay for Vuc. It's a bad value move. The pick is a potential gold ticket.


Maybe its protected? Or maybe it is made into a pick swap along with a future GSW pick? Maybe just adjust that compensation
Chapelchilla
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,989
And1: 1,412
Joined: Aug 04, 2014
         

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1206 » by Chapelchilla » Tue Mar 9, 2021 4:22 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
stinger14 wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:Sneaking suspicion: something around Rozier + Cody for Vuc + Fournier.


Or Hayward/Zeller for Vucevic/Fournier

Melo
Rozier
Fournier
PJ
Vuc

It's an interesting thought experiment - who is more movable, Rozier or Hayward?

On the one hand, I just can't imagine moving Hayward when we treated it like this windfall when we signed him. We talked about him like he was a necessary add to stabilize Ball.

On the other hand, I also think it's clear that Rozier has carved out a significant leadership role, and he's a lot younger and better fits our core timeline. Hayward did sign our offer when Cliff was the coach, so there's at least some history there. Maybe he wouldn't be upset about us moving him?


We are not trading Hayward
stinger14
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 769
Joined: Jan 11, 2014
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1207 » by stinger14 » Tue Mar 9, 2021 4:41 pm

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
stinger14 wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:hey I liked the trade you asked me about in PM, but it wouldn't let me reply to you for some reason, says your inbox isn't set up for receiving PMs. I'd leave ORL out of that though


You don't feel they would want expirings and picks? I felt GSW might be more inclined to trade Wiseman if they also got Vuc back.

no i think that sending the MIN pick is an overpay for Vuc. It's a bad value move. The pick is a potential gold ticket.


I mean I would be okay leaving Orlando out, doesn't change anything for us. Just trying to add more win now incentive for GSW
Soul Rebel
Senior
Posts: 577
And1: 372
Joined: Jun 10, 2015
Location: SEA: HNL : CLT
Contact:
         

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1208 » by Soul Rebel » Tue Mar 9, 2021 4:53 pm

OrlMagic05 wrote:
Soul Rebel wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:
How about top 5 protected.


What do you think ORL would ask for Bamba + Fournier?


Fournier being an expiring i dont think will land us much, but Bamba has shown glimpses of being a good player, he just cant get out of Cliffords dog house for some reason. To me Bamba is still on that boarderline untouchable line because when he does play he is very efficient. I would love to see him actually play some meaningful minutes before trading him away unless the package was worth it.


I get it - as most here will attest to, Cliff is set in his ways...and it's frustrating if you believe in your young guys.

I was trying to tie the Fournier rumor with a young center that is exactly what we're looking for. Fournier isn't desired per se, but he seems like the type of expiring vet that playoff teams trade for to upgrade their roster.

Bamba is the prize that I want. Cliff is ruining and wasting him big time!
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1209 » by DY_nasty » Tue Mar 9, 2021 7:49 pm

i wouldn't trade a single pick for vuc
BuzzCity
Rookie
Posts: 1,145
And1: 609
Joined: Apr 21, 2014
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1210 » by BuzzCity » Wed Mar 10, 2021 4:09 pm

OrlMagic05 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:Magic fan comes in peace.. Curious to know if Hornet fans would consider 21 unprotected 1st and fillers for Vuc?


No. He is good, but that is what you give up for a surefire all-star in his prime. Vuc is 30 and a borderline all-star.


How about top 5 protected.


I know other have said no, but I’m definitely ok with trading a top 5 protected pick...just depends on what else u want...Zeller and Monk? Sign me up
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1211 » by BeesWax » Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:32 pm

BuzzCity wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
No. He is good, but that is what you give up for a surefire all-star in his prime. Vuc is 30 and a borderline all-star.


How about top 5 protected.


I know other have said no, but I’m definitely ok with trading a top 5 protected pick...just depends on what else u want...Zeller and Monk? Sign me up

I think once you include the pick I am out. Even top 5 protected. If it were possible to trade Zeller and a pick for him them I am in but once we have to throw in a Monk or something on top of it we get into overpay territory.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
stinger14
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 769
Joined: Jan 11, 2014
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1212 » by stinger14 » Thu Mar 11, 2021 12:48 pm

I wouldn't trade Monk straight up for Fournier, and I certainly am not trading a 1st that is only top 5 protected in a loaded draft.

Zeller and top 20 protected 1st that if not conveyed in 2021 turns to (2) 2nds is the best I would offer
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,310
And1: 6,283
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1213 » by JMAC3 » Thu Mar 11, 2021 3:50 pm

stinger14 wrote:I wouldn't trade Monk straight up for Fournier, and I certainly am not trading a 1st that is only top 5 protected in a loaded draft.

Zeller and top 20 protected 1st that if not conveyed in 2021 turns to (2) 2nds is the best I would offer


Yeah that’s not even close to getting Vucevic... he is cost controlled for next 2.5 years and is an Allstar.

Zeller and 2 seconds is an awful offer
Soul Rebel
Senior
Posts: 577
And1: 372
Joined: Jun 10, 2015
Location: SEA: HNL : CLT
Contact:
         

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1214 » by Soul Rebel » Thu Mar 11, 2021 4:44 pm

stinger14 wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:
DY_nasty wrote:do these people actually follow basketball or do they just treat it like reality tv?


They’re actually a great fit together.


I agree, especially in the Borrego offense. I mentioned it before, a trade involving Rozier for Lonzo/Jaxson Hayes makes a lot of sense


I really like Jaxson Hayes and would want him more than Lonzo in the deal. However, I think bringing Lonzo over would be great for LaMelo, helps improve our defense and I think each can elevate the other's game. Not to say that Lonzo would be the starter per se, but having him here as part of a package that brings Hayes would be sweet.

Not sure what NO would want for the two of them, but I'd kick the tires to see what the ask is.

Hayes won't be 21 until May of this year and fills a huge need for us. Can get some PT this year and use Zeller + Biyombo's tutelage....unless one of them is part of the deal going back.
stinger14
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 769
Joined: Jan 11, 2014
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1215 » by stinger14 » Thu Mar 11, 2021 4:50 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
stinger14 wrote:I wouldn't trade Monk straight up for Fournier, and I certainly am not trading a 1st that is only top 5 protected in a loaded draft.

Zeller and top 20 protected 1st that if not conveyed in 2021 turns to (2) 2nds is the best I would offer


Yeah that’s not even close to getting Vucevic... he is cost controlled for next 2.5 years and is an Allstar.

Zeller and 2 seconds is an awful offer


Vuc? I was talking about Fournier.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,607
And1: 14,298
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1216 » by HornetJail » Thu Mar 11, 2021 7:17 pm

stinger14 wrote:I wouldn't trade Monk straight up for Fournier, and I certainly am not trading a 1st that is only top 5 protected in a loaded draft.

Zeller and top 20 protected 1st that if not conveyed in 2021 turns to (2) 2nds is the best I would offer

i wouldn't do that either. who plays center?
investigate Adam Silver
stinger14
Starter
Posts: 2,306
And1: 769
Joined: Jan 11, 2014
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1217 » by stinger14 » Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:02 pm

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
stinger14 wrote:I wouldn't trade Monk straight up for Fournier, and I certainly am not trading a 1st that is only top 5 protected in a loaded draft.

Zeller and top 20 protected 1st that if not conveyed in 2021 turns to (2) 2nds is the best I would offer

i wouldn't do that either. who plays center?


I don't know, but I am not trading a 23 year old shooting 44% from deep for a 28 year old shooting 37% from deep to add a shooter/floor spacer off the bench. The 23 year old has plenty of room to grow, the 28 year old is in his prime and expiring. Seems like backwards thinking, especially for a young team like tge Hornets.
Roll Tide 09
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,263
And1: 439
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:
       

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1218 » by Roll Tide 09 » Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:01 pm

I still believe Washington needs to go before he potentially loses value. We have a young star and we don’t have time to bank on players who regress or don’t progress. 12 points and 6 rebounds for a starting Power Forward is easy to find...particularly when your starting Power Forward is very inconsistent. Monk and Miles should stay. Graham, Washington, Zeller, and Biyombo should all be on the trading block.
IG: @theonlylogicalthinker
IG: @arisethecompany

Twitter: @arisethecompany

Website: www.arisethecompany.com
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1219 » by DY_nasty » Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:12 pm

miles can go too

i don't understand how the guy can be featured less but somehow turn the ball over *more* while still being allergic driving towards the rim despite being the most athletic guy on the court most nights
BuzzCity
Rookie
Posts: 1,145
And1: 609
Joined: Apr 21, 2014
 

Re: Fake Trade Thread #3 

Post#1220 » by BuzzCity » Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:25 am

stinger14 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
stinger14 wrote:I wouldn't trade Monk straight up for Fournier, and I certainly am not trading a 1st that is only top 5 protected in a loaded draft.

Zeller and top 20 protected 1st that if not conveyed in 2021 turns to (2) 2nds is the best I would offer


Yeah that’s not even close to getting Vucevic... he is cost controlled for next 2.5 years and is an Allstar.

Zeller and 2 seconds is an awful offer


Vuc? I was talking about Fournier.


I’m all kinds of confused...we were talking about Vuc...what made u start talking bout Fournier...my bad if I missed something

Return to Charlotte Hornets