NatP4 wrote:
Yeah I like him. I want Mobley, but If we somehow came away with Queta and Ayo I'd be happy.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
NatP4 wrote:
NatP4 wrote:Barnes is now 31-50 from the field over his last 6 games, 3-6 from 3. 14-16 from the free throw line in his last 7 games.
The only thing that holds him back as a prospect is the shooting.
Dat2U wrote:I like NatP4's guy Wagner. His defensive awareness impresses me as much as his skill on offense.
I see him as the Haliburton of this draft. The glue guy that can impact both sides of the court immediately. He feels like a really safe pick.
Utah's front office is probably drooling at the prospect of trading up for him lol.
NatP4 wrote:Respect your opinion, Nate. You should watch a full FSU game in the tournament if you can. Not much comparison there. We’d have to wait 2.5 years to compare the numbers Barnes could put up playing college basketball. As a freshman, Turner averaged 3.9 assists and 3.9 turnovers per 40. Barnes currently has the 3rd best assist/turnover ratio in the country as a freshman and averages 6.8 assists and 3.7 turnovers per 40.
Turner also had a 6’8 wingspan and stood 6’5 without shoes. That is a Troy Brown build. Nowhere close to the 7’3 wingspan and 9’0 standing reach that Barnes possesses. No one ever once made the claim that Turner could switch and guard 1-5. Barnes can do that.
The obvious comparison to me is Kyle Anderson with less rebounding ability, and look at how he exploded in his sophomore season at UCLA.
Barnes will improve as a 3pt shooter, and he is already willing to take a fair amount of them. He has shown clear improvement from the FT line as the season has gone along. You already have a player that is extremely efficient inside the arc and around the basket. He brings primary playmaker skills and versatile 1-5 switching defense. Really good basketball IQ and leadership ability.
There’s a lot of potential there. Id like to watch him a lot more. Hopefully FSU makes a deep tourney run. They are dangerous
nate33 wrote:NatP4 wrote:Respect your opinion, Nate. You should watch a full FSU game in the tournament if you can. Not much comparison there. We’d have to wait 2.5 years to compare the numbers Barnes could put up playing college basketball. As a freshman, Turner averaged 3.9 assists and 3.9 turnovers per 40. Barnes currently has the 3rd best assist/turnover ratio in the country as a freshman and averages 6.8 assists and 3.7 turnovers per 40.
Turner also had a 6’8 wingspan and stood 6’5 without shoes. That is a Troy Brown build. Nowhere close to the 7’3 wingspan and 9’0 standing reach that Barnes possesses. No one ever once made the claim that Turner could switch and guard 1-5. Barnes can do that.
The obvious comparison to me is Kyle Anderson with less rebounding ability, and look at how he exploded in his sophomore season at UCLA.
Barnes will improve as a 3pt shooter, and he is already willing to take a fair amount of them. He has shown clear improvement from the FT line as the season has gone along. You already have a player that is extremely efficient inside the arc and around the basket. He brings primary playmaker skills and versatile 1-5 switching defense. Really good basketball IQ and leadership ability.
There’s a lot of potential there. Id like to watch him a lot more. Hopefully FSU makes a deep tourney run. They are dangerous
Those are all good points. As I said, my evaluation is limited to just highlights, which certainly don't tell the whole story. My main point is to not get too excited by the gaudy assist numbers. I really think that's due to his role, not his innate basketball instincts.
If your comp is Kyle Anderson with less rebounding, does he deserve to be a mid-lotto pick? Shouldn't that be a guy that goes in the 12-20 range?
NatP4 wrote:Basically went with my favorite prospects in my bracket lol.
Got Gonzaga, Michigan, Baylor, and Tennessee in the final 4. Who you guys got?
Ruzious wrote:doclinkin wrote:Okay I want a trade back to pick up Queta and Butler and picks. I'd take our #7/8 for OKC's #17 and #31 and whatever else I could wrangle. Though I'd be nervous about the Spurs at #21. I expect the mocks will change after the combine, Queta looks like he will measure long. I think he is a dark horse for some team to 'reach' for him in the first round. I wouldn't hate if that was us. Maybe getting Davion Mitchell instead of Butler.
I love it. I'm leaning more towards Bassey than Queta, but I'll probably change a bunch of times before the draft. Love to get Butler, but I'll settle for Mitchell. Bassey and Butler would make me happy. They both have that winning step on your neck mentality.
nate33 wrote:The big man for Illinois, Kofi Cockburn, is listed as a 7-footer. He looks more like about 6-10 to me.
If he's a legit 7-feet, he has to be someone worth considering in the 2nd round. He could have a Valanciunas type impact if things break right. He'll probably never be a rim protector, but a guy that big and strong can cause problems for a defense.
Ruzious wrote:Ruzious wrote:doclinkin wrote:Okay I want a trade back to pick up Queta and Butler and picks. I'd take our #7/8 for OKC's #17 and #31 and whatever else I could wrangle. Though I'd be nervous about the Spurs at #21. I expect the mocks will change after the combine, Queta looks like he will measure long. I think he is a dark horse for some team to 'reach' for him in the first round. I wouldn't hate if that was us. Maybe getting Davion Mitchell instead of Butler.
I love it. I'm leaning more towards Bassey than Queta, but I'll probably change a bunch of times before the draft. Love to get Butler, but I'll settle for Mitchell. Bassey and Butler would make me happy. They both have that winning step on your neck mentality.
On the Bassey v Queta front, Queta recently had a 9 block game and has probably out-played Bassey by a little, but one thing sticks out for me lately to want Bassey more - he's made 5 3's in his last 3 games - out of 15 attempts - not a great percentage, but it's now part of his arsenal. And he makes 77.8% of his FT's - so it's believable that he'll be a competent 3 point shooter in the NBA. If we don't get a top 4 pick, he'd be the player I'd most like to get. Obviously, if we can trade down and still get him, I'd prefer that. I do like Moody best of the players expect to go from 5 to 7. Still a big fan of the UVA connection of Hauser and Huff later in the draft. I hope to see Gonzaga vs UVA in the 3rd round of the NCAA Tournament. If any team can upset Gonzaga, I think it's UVA.