WallToWall wrote:payitforward wrote:The Consiglieri wrote:
You definitely do not sound undecided in your posts about Rui, and that's fine, it's emphatically clear you think he sucks. Emphatically clear. You're being disingenuous here. You're not in neutral, "lets wait and see" mode at all, and that's fine, opinions are what boards are for, and you (or is it PIF?) definitely marshal some evidence to back up your takes...
Sorry, but this does not describe me. I've made myself clear a thousand times.
1. Picking Rui # 9 in the 2019 draft was not a good move. Note that this is not the same as saying Rui can't become a terrific player.
2. As a rookie, Rui did the single most important positive thing possible -- he proved that he was not a bust & not going to be one. I only wrote these exact words about 2 dozen times.
3. Rui has the potential to become an outstanding NBA player. These words too I have written about 2 dozen times. Beginning I guess about 10-12 games into his rookie year. "Has the potential to become" is not the same "is destined to become."
4. So far, Rui hasn't been very good at all. Great game vs. the Bucks -- all praise for that. If he keeps that up then he will make it true that he has the potential to be outstanding. Overall, however, he wasn't "good" as a rookie by any measure. &, overall, he hasn't gotten better as a 2d year player.
That's as far as it goes. There is no more to say than that.
PIF - I would be curious to find comparisons of players who have played 80 games (or a full season) versus Hach, to gauge who he best compares. One good game doesn't make a good player. But I do think he shows flashes, and given his lack of experience with basketball in general, he may end up being a late bloomer.
To take these in reverse order --
Yes, he may be a late bloomer. Better to think of it that way than to make claims for how he's played his first 2400 NBA minutes -- either overall or in terms of 2d season improvements.
&... you bet he shows flashes. Plus, he's got terrific size & athleticism. I.e. he has a lot to work with.
Then again, he may
not turn out to be a late bloomer. Or that "bloom" (his peak) may not be anything to write home about. We don't know.
Moreover, the reason we concentrate on the "flashes" is that the overall, game-to-game level of his play is not worth concentrating on -- i.e. it isn't very good. All the same -- don't get me wrong -- we should definitely take note of the areas where he does show improvement.
Thus, his 3pt. %, while not very good is improved -- & that's on more attempts too. So, that's a good thing. & he is getting the line more as well. OTOH, his FT% is down. That's a bad thing.
Don't laud the good thing, then find a way to play down the bad thing. Both count. Equally & in the same way.
So, yes, Rui's TS% is up. But, his rebounding % is down. His assist % is down, his block % is down, his steal % is down, his turnover % is up, his usage is down, & his points are down -- both per game & per 40 minutes.
Most of these differences -- the positive ones & the negative ones alike -- are small, but the overall picture is of a player who is, if anything, slightly worse overall in his second year. & that's after a rookie year that was not good. Nor is
pointing out facts to be taken as "hating" on Rui.
Far from it -- he had a tremendous game last night, the best game of his NBA career by a lot! Here's hoping we see a bunch more of them!
Edit -- as to "comparisons of players who have played 80 games (or a full season) versus Hach, to gauge who he best compares..." I can't right off come up with an apt comparison. Anyone else got an idea?