ATL Offseason - Boyle to the Lions

Daver · Post #1861 » by **Daver** » Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:24 pm

The inactivity of these packers drives me to drink alot is disgust.I dont want to hear about the cap either.TB was over the cap yet resigned david barrett and franchised tagged their WR.Vikings same way packers will never go all in like TB couldnt afford 9 million for fuller for 1 year is gute another TT 2.0

LittleRooster · Post #1862 » by **LittleRooster** » Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:32 pm

Daver wrote:The inactivity of these packers drives me to drink alot is disgust.I dont want to hear about the cap either.TB was over the cap yet resigned david barrett and franchised tagged their WR.Vikings same way packers will never go all in like TB couldnt afford 9 million for fuller for 1 year is gute another TT 2.0

Lol. I guess resigning Bak and Jones don’t count

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

stillgotgame · Post #1863 » by **stillgotgame** » Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:35 pm

Pretty disappointing to see us not getting a corner. We clearly have a need and some good players are/were available.
The fact that Gute has Rodgers contract available to rework and he hasn’t(so far) is very telling imo. Clearly not going for it this year at the expense of more flexibility in the future.

Daver · Post #1864 » by **Daver** » Sat Mar 20, 2021 11:07 pm

LittleRooster wrote:
Daver wrote:The inactivity of these packers drives me to drink alot is disgust.I dont want to hear about the cap either.TB was over the cap yet resigned david barrett and franchised tagged their WR.Vikings same way packers will never go all in like TB couldnt afford 9 million for fuller for 1 year is gute another TT 2.0

Lol. I guess resigning Bak and Jones don’t count

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wheres the money better spent on jones or a stud tackle to play next to clark or a really good DB to play opposite alexander or resigning jones.
Bakti was extended when november december im talking FA (now).

Daver · Post #1865 » by **Daver** » Sat Mar 20, 2021 11:09 pm

stillgotgame wrote:Pretty disappointing to see us not getting a corner. We clearly have a need and some good players are/were available.
The fact that Gute has Rodgers contract available to rework and he hasn’t(so far) is very telling imo. Clearly not going for it this year at the expense of more flexibility in the future.

Unlike TB your right unfortunately

sdn40 · Post #1866 » by **sdn40** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:04 am

Read on Twitter

Profound23 · Post #1867 » by **Profound23** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:31 am

sdn40 wrote:

Read on Twitter

If Rhodes is signing for that, King on a 1 yr/5mil should be easy.

slappyg · Post #1868 » by **slappyg** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:40 am

Profound23 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:

Read on Twitter

If Rhodes is signing for that, King on a 1 yr/5mil should be easy.

Fuller on a 1 year for 9.5 would have been a great move!

RRyder823 · Post #1869 » by **RRyder823** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 4:01 am

LittleRooster wrote:
Daver wrote:The inactivity of these packers drives me to drink alot is disgust.I dont want to hear about the cap either.TB was over the cap yet resigned david barrett and franchised tagged their WR.Vikings same way packers will never go all in like TB couldnt afford 9 million for fuller for 1 year is gute another TT 2.0

Lol. I guess resigning Bak and Jones don’t count

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And Clark too apparently.

Resigning one of if not the best LT in football, the best RB on the market and one of the best nosetackles in the league apparently is just not doing enough.

(oh sorry I forgot since they were proactive with Bahk and Clark those two signings don't mean nothin)

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

sdn40 · Post #1870 » by **sdn40** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 4:21 am

RRyder823 wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
Daver wrote:The inactivity of these packers drives me to drink alot is disgust.I dont want to hear about the cap either.TB was over the cap yet resigned david barrett and franchised tagged their WR.Vikings same way packers will never go all in like TB couldnt afford 9 million for fuller for 1 year is gute another TT 2.0

Lol. I guess resigning Bak and Jones don’t count

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Clark too apparently.

Resigning one of if not the best LT in football, the best RB on the market and one of the best nosetackles in the league apparently is just not doing enough.

(oh sorry I forgot since they were proactive with Bahk and Clark those two signings don't mean nothin)

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

And since they lost Linsley, Lancaster, Adams, and King, they are worse than they were a year ago. I thought the idea was to get better

skones · Post #1871 » by **skones** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 5:43 am

Jesus Isaiah Wilson just burning his life to the ground.

RRyder823 · Post #1872 » by **RRyder823** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:54 am

sdn40 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:Lol. I guess resigning Bak and Jones don’t count

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Clark too apparently.

Resigning one of if not the best LT in football, the best RB on the market and one of the best nosetackles in the league apparently is just not doing enough.

(oh sorry I forgot since they were proactive with Bahk and Clark those two signings don't mean nothin)

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

And since they lost Linsley, Lancaster, Adams, and King, they are worse than they were a year ago. I thought the idea was to get better

There's this thing called player development that when you're tight up against the cap you need cause yes you can't keep everyone.

FYI this was said last offseason as well

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

RiotPunch · Post #1873 » by **RiotPunch** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 8:10 am

skones wrote:Jesus Isaiah Wilson just burning his life to the ground.

Kenny Powers of the NFL

sdn40 · Post #1874 » by **sdn40** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 11:40 am

RRyder823 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:And Clark too apparently.

Resigning one of if not the best LT in football, the best RB on the market and one of the best nosetackles in the league apparently is just not doing enough.

(oh sorry I forgot since they were proactive with Bahk and Clark those two signings don't mean nothin)

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

And since they lost Linsley, Lancaster, Adams, and King, they are worse than they were a year ago. I thought the idea was to get better

There's this thing called player development that when you're tight up against the cap you need cause yes you can't keep everyone.

FYI this was said last offseason as wel

Not sure who was saying it last year since the depth chart was pretty well set. Who are they gonna develop ? Josh Jackson ? Anthony Rush ? Yosh Nijman ? These are the guys that will get us over the hump to the Super Bowl ?

MoMM · Post #1875 » by **MoMM** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 12:24 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
Daver wrote:The inactivity of these packers drives me to drink alot is disgust.I dont want to hear about the cap either.TB was over the cap yet resigned david barrett and franchised tagged their WR.Vikings same way packers will never go all in like TB couldnt afford 9 million for fuller for 1 year is gute another TT 2.0

Lol. I guess resigning Bak and Jones don’t count

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Clark too apparently.

Resigning one of if not the best LT in football, the best RB on the market and one of the best nosetackles in the league apparently is just not doing enough.

(oh sorry I forgot since they were proactive with Bahk and Clark those two signings don't mean nothin)

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

And do not forget that we have to re-sign Jaire and Adams next offseason, 2 top5 players in their positions.

CWoodfan · Post #1876 » by **CWoodfan** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:06 pm

Profound23 wrote:
sdn40 wrote:

Read on Twitter

If Rhodes is signing for that, King on a 1 yr/5mil should be easy.

Just how bad is Kevin King in the eyes of the other 31 teams?

30 CBs have already been signed during free agency and there has not been a peep about King signing anywhere.

Yeah, sure bring King back so he can play like crap again.

Might as well bring back Lancaster too so he and Lowry can play next to Clark for a 3rd straight year.

Daver · Post #1877 » by **Daver** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 3:30 pm

MoMM wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:Lol. I guess resigning Bak and Jones don’t count

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Clark too apparently.

Resigning one of if not the best LT in football, the best RB on the market and one of the best nosetackles in the league apparently is just not doing enough.

(oh sorry I forgot since they were proactive with Bahk and Clark those two signings don't mean nothin)

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

And do not forget that we have to re-sign Jaire and Adams next offseason, 2 top5 players in their positions.

If they really wanted to go all in this year you redo adams n rogers contract which would open up 14 million plus dollars ....fact is they are not going all in unlike TB did who by the way was as bad as the packers were in cap space yet somehow seemed to bring back all 3 of their studs

RRyder823 · Post #1878 » by **RRyder823** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 4:29 pm

Daver wrote:
MoMM wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:And Clark too apparently.

Resigning one of if not the best LT in football, the best RB on the market and one of the best nosetackles in the league apparently is just not doing enough.

(oh sorry I forgot since they were proactive with Bahk and Clark those two signings don't mean nothin)

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

And do not forget that we have to re-sign Jaire and Adams next offseason, 2 top5 players in their positions.

If they really wanted to go all in this year you redo adams n rogers contract which would open up 14 million plus dollars ....fact is they are not going all in unlike TB did who by the way was as bad as the packers were in cap space yet somehow seemed to bring back all 3 of their studs

And GB resigned 3 of their studs as well. Or do those resignings not count for some reason?

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

Reddeye · Post #1879 » by **Reddeye** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 4:38 pm

Daver wrote:The inactivity of these packers drives me to drink alot is disgust.I dont want to hear about the cap either.TB was over the cap yet resigned david barrett and franchised tagged their WR.Vikings same way packers will never go all in like TB couldnt afford 9 million for fuller for 1 year is gute another TT 2.0

You keep posting this over and over and it is not true. Tampa had much more room under the cap than the Packers did. Vikings also were in better shape than the Packers.

This tweet is from March 4th.

Read on Twitter

sdn40 · Post #1880 » by **sdn40** » Sun Mar 21, 2021 4:40 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
Daver wrote:
MoMM wrote:And do not forget that we have to re-sign Jaire and Adams next offseason, 2 top5 players in their positions.

If they really wanted to go all in this year you redo adams n rogers contract which would open up 14 million plus dollars ....fact is they are not going all in unlike TB did who by the way was as bad as the packers were in cap space yet somehow seemed to bring back all 3 of their studs
And GB resigned 3 of their studs as well. Or do those resignings not count for some reason?

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

Get over it. Of course they count. They also count for the 31 other teams that are re-signing their own good players. But if that's all you do, you're not getting better, therefore you are getting worse