Around the League: 2020 Offseason

Negrodamus · Post #2001 » by **Negrodamus** » Mon Mar 22, 2021 6:59 pm

Read on Twitter

Damn, dude was a legend.

Monix · Post #2002 » by **Monix** » Mon Mar 22, 2021 7:36 pm

76ciology wrote:Would you trade Paul Reed for Marvin Bagley? How about Thybulle for Bagley?

no

I wouldn't trade anyone on the Sixers roster for Bagley

LloydFree · Post #2003 » by **LloydFree** » Mon Mar 22, 2021 8:22 pm

Milwaukee could sneak up and grab the #1 seed by the end of the week. They have a bunch of easy home games coming up. The Nets are on the road out west, without Kyrie Irving. The 76ers on the road without Embiid and maybe Curry.

the_process · Post #2004 » by **the_process** » Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:21 pm

Monix wrote:
76ciology wrote:Would you trade Paul Reed for Marvin Bagley? How about Thybulle for Bagley?

no

I wouldn't trade anyone on the Sixers roster for Bagley

Well, I mean if they will accept Mike Scott and a 2nd...

Monix · Post #2005 » by **Monix** » Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:00 pm

the_process wrote:
Monix wrote:
76ciology wrote:Would you trade Paul Reed for Marvin Bagley? How about Thybulle for Bagley?

no

I wouldn't trade anyone on the Sixers roster for Bagley

Well, I mean if they will accept Mike Scott and a 2nd...

nope, wouldn't do it

Kobblehead · Post #2006 » by **Kobblehead** » Tue Mar 23, 2021 12:40 am

I see zero appeal in Marvin Bagley. I see no value in the entire PF position, as is. You take a guy that is trash defensively and has no natural shooting range and I'm completely out on that guy, altogether.

Post #2007 » by **Sixerscan** » Tue Mar 23, 2021 1:44 am

LloydFree wrote:Milwaukee could sneak up and grab the #1 seed by the end of the week. They have a bunch of easy home games coming up. The Nets are on the road out west, without Kyrie Irving. The 76ers on the road without Embiid and maybe Curry.

Bucks are back on regular season cruise control after the bump with Jrue out.

76ciology · Post #2008 » by **76ciology** » Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:15 pm

Read on Twitter

Explains why Nunn i playing more.

I remember when the Heat were planning to trade Jrich for Jimmy, they tried to pad Jrich’s value by giving him a bigger role.

Heat’s quite good in making players bigger than who they are. A really good example is Whiteside. And maybe Winslow?

I remember in Winslow’s last days with the Heat they also let him run a bigger role. To the extent that Winslow was running pick and rolls.

76ciology · Post #2009 » by **76ciology** » Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:17 pm

Read on Twitter

Magic really has no plans to win the championship. They were broken when D12 left and never recovered. And it was like 10 years ago

Negrodamus · Post #2010 » by **Negrodamus** » Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:58 pm

76ciology wrote:

Read on Twitter

Magic really has no plans to win the championship. They were broken when D12 left and never recovered. And it was like 10 years ago

I'd be shocked if the Magic even considered this. No way DeRozan would stick around with them.

spikeslovechild · Post #2011 » by **spikeslovechild** » Wed Mar 24, 2021 4:59 am

Kobblehead wrote:I see zero appeal in Marvin Bagley. I see no value in the entire PF position, as is. You take a guy that is trash defensively and has no natural shooting range and I'm completely out on that guy, altogether.

He has a developing 3PT shot and is only 21. If they took the TPE and a cpl of 2nds I'd do it

sixers4real · Post #2012 » by **sixers4real** » Wed Mar 24, 2021 6:13 am

spikeslovechild wrote:
Kobblehead wrote:I see zero appeal in Marvin Bagley. I see no value in the entire PF position, as is. You take a guy that is trash defensively and has no natural shooting range and I'm completely out on that guy, altogether.

He has a developing 3PT shot and is only 21. If they took the TPE and a cpl of 2nds I'd do it

We can’t have him for Horfords TPE.

76ciology · Post #2013 » by **76ciology** » Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:35 pm

Im telling u. This guy is good.not a fluke

Read on Twitter

Negrodamus · Post #2014 » by **Negrodamus** » Wed Mar 24, 2021 1:55 pm

76ciology wrote:Im telling u. This guy is good.not a fluke

Read on Twitter

Imma need to see the 3FGM assisted %. There's a difference between shooting open threes and shooting volume contested threes.

spikeslovechild · Post #2015 » by **spikeslovechild** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:31 am

sixers4real wrote:
spikeslovechild wrote:
Kobblehead wrote:I see zero appeal in Marvin Bagley. I see no value in the entire PF position, as is. You take a guy that is trash defensively and has no natural shooting range and I'm completely out on that guy, altogether.

He has a developing 3PT shot and is only 21. If they took the TPE and a cpl of 2nds I'd do it

We can’t have him for Horfords TPE.

Out of curosity why?

sixers4real · Post #2016 » by **sixers4real** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:34 am

spikeslovechild wrote:
sixers4real wrote:
spikeslovechild wrote:
He has a developing 3PT shot and is only 21. If they took the TPE and a cpl of 2nds I'd do it

We can’t have him for Horfords TPE.

Out of curosity why?

Horfords TPE is 8,190,134
Bagleys contract is 8,963,640

spikeslovechild · Post #2017 » by **spikeslovechild** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:54 am

sixers4real wrote:
spikeslovechild wrote:
sixers4real wrote:We can’t have him for Horfords TPE.

Out of curosity why?

Horfords TPE is 8,190,134
Bagleys contract is 8,963,640

I believe you are wrong. As a luxury tax club the sixers should be eligible to take back 125 percent of the TPE plus 100K or 10.4M in any trade.

Therefore the trade would be legal.

If they were below the tax then they could only take back +100K which would make the trade not possible. If someone wants to correct me on this I would be interested to know I am just going off memory of the old CBA.

sixers4real · Post #2018 » by **sixers4real** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 2:58 am

spikeslovechild wrote:
sixers4real wrote:
spikeslovechild wrote:
Out of curosity why?

Horfords TPE is 8,190,134
Bagleys contract is 8,963,640

I believe you are wrong. As a luxury tax club the sixers should be eligible to take back 125 percent of the TPE plus 100K or 10.4M in any trade.

Therefore the trade would be legal.

If they were below the tax then they could only take back +100K which would make the trade not possible. If someone wants to correct me on this I would be interested to know I am just going off memory of the old CBA.

Well, maybe I’m wrong myself. I don’t know the exact details, but I’m leaning towards the understanding where you can’t even take back + 100K under the new CBA.

Negrodamus · Post #2019 » by **Negrodamus** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 3:01 am

Jazz annihilating the Nets. Gives us a little breathing room.

Skates · Post #2020 » by **Skates** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 3:12 am

Negrodamus wrote:
76ciology wrote:Im telling u. This guy is good.not a fluke

Read on Twitter

Imma need to see the 3FGM assisted %. There's a difference between shooting open threes and shooting volume contested threes.

We have seen the Knicks, Randle is for real. No one gets easy shots in their crappy offense. The real trick to this stat is picking Beal as a comparison. His rep as a three point shooter exceeds his ability for the casual fan. Beal is a pure scorer, but not a great deep shooter, though he can get hot from there.