[Shams] Hill to PHI

Post #21 » by **jbk1234** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:52 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:So ?

Philly out: Bradley and Fergusson (2 2nds)
Philly in: Hill

NYK out: Rivers
NYK in: Bradley and Fergusson

OKC out: Hill
OKC in: Rivers and (2 2nds)

If OKC took both seconds over Bradley, Presti is slipping.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app

Post #22 » by **FNQ** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:53 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
FNQ wrote:Does this mean that Seth Curry might be out for a while?

Pre-Trade Sixers bench was:
Maxey/Shake/Thybulle/Korkmaz/Scott/Dwight (I listed 6, yes)

They desperately needed Hill and to be able to do:
Hill/Shake/Thybulle//Scott/Dwight

Scott still sucks though..

Maxey didnt play well against us but I thought he was a fixture in PHI's rotation?

the_process · Post #23 » by **the_process** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:53 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
FNQ wrote:Does this mean that Seth Curry might be out for a while?

Pre-Trade Sixers bench was:
Maxey/Shake/Thybulle/Korkmaz/Scott/Dwight (I listed 6, yes)

They desperately needed Hill and to be able to do:
Hill/Shake/Thybulle//Scott/Dwight

Scott still sucks though..

Lauri still available and fits into the Horford TPE...

Post #24 » by **BullyKing** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:54 pm

I've always loved Hill and have been proposing trades for him to the Sixers since last year so I like it. Wish we could have figured out a way to match salary other than Bradley but it is what it is.

rzzzzz · Post #25 » by **rzzzzz** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:55 pm

So does this mean Embiid is mending right quick?

Post #26 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:55 pm

FNQ wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
FNQ wrote:Does this mean that Seth Curry might be out for a while?

Pre-Trade Sixers bench was:
Maxey/Shake/Thybulle/Korkmaz/Scott/Dwight (I listed 6, yes)

They desperately needed Hill and to be able to do:
Hill/Shake/Thybulle//Scott/Dwight

Scott still sucks though..

Maxey didnt play well against us but I thought he was a fixture in PHI's rotation?

Way to raw for a run this year. Or maybe next year.

Post #27 » by **gswhoops** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:56 pm

So with Hill to Philly and Bjelica to Miami...is Lowry really gonna be a Laker???

giberish · Post #28 » by **giberish** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:59 pm

gswhoops wrote:So with Hill to Philly and Bjelica to Miami...is Lowry really gonna be a Laker???

Or he just stays in Toronto. It was always going to be tough for teams to match salaries with Lowry and add meaningful value to Toronto and I don't see the Raptors dealing Lowry for PEZ.

Of course I could easily be wrong very shortly.

Post #29 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:01 pm

OKC just swapping Ferg for Rivers, and OKC is getting Rivers, Bradley, 2 2nds right? Or is this playing out differently?

Post #30 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:02 pm

gswhoops wrote:So with Hill to Philly and Bjelica to Miami...is Lowry really gonna be a Laker???

He's going to Miami. They didn't move any pieces that would be a part of a Lowry deal to make that SAC trade. In fact I think the Bjelica deal ups the chances.

LightTheBeam · Post #31 » by **LightTheBeam** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:05 pm

Whats the pt of NY being in this trade? Just to find a home for Rivers?

AdamTH21 · Post #32 » by **AdamTH21** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:05 pm

gswhoops wrote:So with Hill to Philly and Bjelica to Miami...is Lowry really gonna be a Laker???

I'd say Miami is the more likely option. According to Brad Turner, Lakers are adamant they aren't shifting on THT and I'm struggling to see what the Lakers give up when he isn't involved that Toronto would bite on that also works out salary wise.

Post #33 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:08 pm

AdamTH21 wrote:
gswhoops wrote:So with Hill to Philly and Bjelica to Miami...is Lowry really gonna be a Laker???

I'd say Miami is the more likely option. According to Brad Turner, Lakers are adamant they aren't shifting on THT and I'm struggling to see what the Lakers give up when he isn't involved that Toronto would bite on that also works out salary wise.

Lakers had a tough road to putting together value with THT. Without, there's nothing there for Toronto except to maybe spite the Clippers and send Lowry to a contender.

Post #34 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:09 pm

RipPizzaGuy wrote:Whats the pt of NY being in this trade? Just to find a home for Rivers?

Ferg was traded from OKC to Philly this year. Needed to launder his salary.

kalenclayton · Post #35 » by **kalenclayton** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:25 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=21

kingcong95 · Post #36 » by **kingcong95** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:30 pm

Knicks get Sixers' late 2nd this year for Iggy. They also have to take Poirier to satisfy Philly's outflow requirements. They might cut Ferguson or Poirier.
OKC can use the Oubre TPE to take in Bradley and Rivers and create a 9.6M for Hill.

Post #37 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:40 pm

So, for 3 late (assumed) or distant 2nds, Philly turned Bradley into Hill with basically staying flat salary wise?

I really don't get it for the Knicks. Did they just take >5m more back in salary for a pick projected around 57th?

kingcong95 · Post #38 » by **kingcong95** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:42 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:So, for 3 late (assumed) or distant 2nds, Philly turned Bradley into Hill with basically staying flat salary wise?

I really don't get it for the Knicks. Did they just take >5m more back in salary for a pick projected around 57th?

Not 5M, 1.5M because they dumped Rivers as well.

Post #39 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:44 pm

kingcong95 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:So, for 3 late (assumed) or distant 2nds, Philly turned Bradley into Hill with basically staying flat salary wise?

I really don't get it for the Knicks. Did they just take >5m more back in salary for a pick projected around 57th?

Not 5M, 1.5M because they dumped Rivers as well.

Thanks. Still seems steep, but suddenly reasonable. :party:

Post #40 » by **Texas Chuck** » Thu Mar 25, 2021 5:46 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
kingcong95 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:So, for 3 late (assumed) or distant 2nds, Philly turned Bradley into Hill with basically staying flat salary wise?

I really don't get it for the Knicks. Did they just take >5m more back in salary for a pick projected around 57th?

Not 5M, 1.5M because they dumped Rivers as well.

Thanks. Still seems steep, but suddenly reasonable.

River has future money too, right? So getting off money for next year seems like a win as well.

Who won?