Unsigned Free agents

eyeatoma · Post #41 » by **eyeatoma** » Tue Apr 6, 2021 10:03 pm

Heat just signed Dedmon. We are so bad at this. Everyone hates Philly.

Read on Twitter

?s=19

Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk

zaz102 · Post #42 » by **zaz102** » Tue Apr 6, 2021 10:24 pm

Is there anyone left who's even worth taking a look at?

cej11 · Post #43 » by **cej11** » Wed Apr 7, 2021 4:42 pm

Morey must have word that someone is getting bought out soon . There is no way they can feel good about the C/Pf position going into the playoffs.

mithrandir17 · Post #44 » by **mithrandir17** » Wed Apr 7, 2021 5:08 pm

How about muscala? Will okc buy him out?

zaz102 · Post #45 » by **zaz102** » Wed Apr 7, 2021 5:19 pm

mithrandir17 wrote:How about muscala? Will okc buy him out?

It would be funny if that happened. It's like we only do business with OKC now.

mithrandir17 · Post #46 » by **mithrandir17** » Wed Apr 7, 2021 5:25 pm

zaz102 wrote:
mithrandir17 wrote:How about muscala? Will okc buy him out?
It would be funny if that happened. It's like we only do business with OKC now.

Well, they already got so many draft picks from us. Muscala can be the free gift when you already paid so much in one store.

the_process · Post #47 » by **the_process** » Wed Apr 7, 2021 5:30 pm

Are we really sure Muscala is better than Scott? I mean, Scott is bad... but so was Muscala when he was in Philly.

mithrandir17 · Post #48 » by **mithrandir17** » Wed Apr 7, 2021 5:36 pm

the_process wrote:Are we really sure Muscala is better than Scott? I mean, Scott is bad... but so was Muscala when he was in Philly.

Muscala is averaging almost 10 points and 37% from 3point in the same amount of minutes as Mike Scott is getting. Plus Muscala can really play Center and PF unlike Scott who is already undersized as a PF.

zaz102 · Post #49 » by **zaz102** » Wed Apr 7, 2021 5:49 pm

mithrandir17 wrote:
the_process wrote:Are we really sure Muscala is better than Scott? I mean, Scott is bad... but so was Muscala when he was in Philly.

Muscala is averaging almost 10 points and 37% from 3point in the same amount of minutes as Mike Scott is getting. Plus Muscala can really play Center and PF unlike Scott who is already undersized as a PF.

I agree 100%. I would take Muscala in a heartbeat. Better than Mike Scott as a PF and C. Also, the market seems to have dried up.

the_process · Post #50 » by **the_process** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 3:48 am

mithrandir17 wrote:
the_process wrote:Are we really sure Muscala is better than Scott? I mean, Scott is bad... but so was Muscala when he was in Philly.

Muscala is averaging almost 10 points and 37% from 3point in the same amount of minutes as Mike Scott is getting. Plus Muscala can really play Center and PF unlike Scott who is already undersized as a PF.

I mean, okay... but do we remember how bad he was defensively? I’m willing to take the chance should OKC decide to let him go, which seems unlikely btw, because Scott does suck. I would just temper the expectation Muscala is going to be an improvement.

mithrandir17 · Post #51 » by **mithrandir17** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 4:19 am

the_process wrote:
mithrandir17 wrote:
the_process wrote:Are we really sure Muscala is better than Scott? I mean, Scott is bad... but so was Muscala when he was in Philly.

Muscala is averaging almost 10 points and 37% from 3point in the same amount of minutes as Mike Scott is getting. Plus Muscala can really play Center and PF unlike Scott who is already undersized as a PF.

I mean, okay... but do we remember how bad he was defensively? I’m willing to take the chance should OKC decide to let him go, which seems unlikely btw, because Scott does suck. I would just temper the expectation Muscala is going to be an improvement.

Defensively atleast Muscala has the height and length over Scott. We don't really need a player who can do it all on both ends. What we need right now is a servicable backup who can play both 4 and 5 and be able to shoot it decently from 3. We have enough guys who can cover the defense. If they can cover for Scott now, they can cover for Muscala.

Negrodamus · Post #52 » by **Negrodamus** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 2:44 pm

Read on Twitter

Gone too soon

Arsenal · Post #53 » by **Arsenal** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 2:50 pm

Signing Muscala would be a no brainer if he comes available. He's a more credible option as a stretch-5 to play w/Ben when Jo is out than Mike Scott is.

LloydFree · Post #54 » by **LloydFree** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 3:16 pm

Mike Muscala is no better than Mike Scott. Especially not in any playoff game. I wouldn't waste the energy it took to dial a phone, to pick him up.

76ciology · Post #55 » by **76ciology** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 3:19 pm

I dont even know whats the difference between Muscala and mike scott. :lol:

Post #56 » by **Stanford** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 3:23 pm

Poor Ignas

Skates · Post #57 » by **Skates** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 3:26 pm

Stanford wrote:Poor Ignas

Iggy's never get a fair shake here, lol.

zaz102 · Post #58 » by **zaz102** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 3:38 pm

I assume this means they're signing someone by tomorrow. We'll see what pick up from the trash heap.

youngcrev · Post #59 » by **youngcrev** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 5:36 pm

LloydFree wrote:Mike Muscala is no better than Mike Scott. Especially not in any playoff game. I wouldn't waste the energy it took to dial a phone, to pick him up.

I dunno, Mike Scott has been pretty terrible since getting that deal he's on now.

Muscala isn't great, but he fits what we need as an option at the 5. He's a willing and able shooter that provides some semblance of rim protection.

youngcrev · Post #60 » by **youngcrev** » Thu Apr 8, 2021 5:37 pm

Stanford wrote:Poor Ignas

Think Doc texted him to wish him well at least?

Which Free agent PF or C could help the most