Image ImageImage Image

Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,705
And1: 6,740
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1821 » by PaKii94 » Fri Apr 9, 2021 9:22 pm

E-DC wrote:Lauri's Shooting at the Rim
2017-18: .676
2018-19: .624
2019-20: .648
2020-21: .750

Lauri's Layup Percentage
2017-18: .483
2018-19: .511
2019-20: .496
2020-21: .584

Lauri's Hook Shot Percentage
2017-18: .320 (8-25)
2018-19: .200 (6-30)
2019-20: .462 (12-26)
2020-21: .900 (9-10)


And this includes "cold streak" games
chefo
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,285
And1: 2,427
Joined: Apr 29, 2009

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1822 » by chefo » Fri Apr 9, 2021 9:23 pm

E-DC wrote:Lauri's Shooting at the Rim
2017-18: .676
2018-19: .624
2019-20: .648
2020-21: .750

Lauri's Layup Percentage
2017-18: .483
2018-19: .511
2019-20: .496
2020-21: .584

Lauri's Hook Shot Percentage
2017-18: .320 (8-25)
2018-19: .200 (6-30)
2019-20: .462 (12-26)
2020-21: .900 (9-10)


Perhaps he finally realized that a 6'7 player can't block a baby hook by a 7'1 player so he needs to work on it? Hopefully, we get to see more of that in the next 20+ games.
Louri
Senior
Posts: 631
And1: 351
Joined: Jun 28, 2017

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1823 » by Louri » Fri Apr 9, 2021 9:26 pm

I'm all-in for skyhook lessons from Kareem. Drag step and Skyhook, what a combo for Lauri.
"Larry Nance Jr is better than Lauri Markkanen" -RealGM 2021
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 26,915
And1: 15,952
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1824 » by Ice Man » Fri Apr 9, 2021 9:28 pm

Ten hooks for the year? He should be getting 10 per week. Well maybe being with Thad will rub off on Lauri. He should be crushing in the paint the tiny tots that so many teams assign to guard him.
User avatar
Grodoboldo
Analyst
Posts: 3,739
And1: 2,834
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Sao Paulo
 

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1825 » by Grodoboldo » Fri Apr 9, 2021 9:36 pm

coldfish wrote: Dallas would be a great fit for him as would LA. The Bulls simply don’t have the top end talent that some teams do and as a result, need more from their supporting players.


I would like a S&T for Tim Hardaway Jr, and would absolutely LOVE one for Josh Richardson (though I don't see any reason why Dallas would do it, since he really fits their team well).
Constantly underwhelmed by the Bulls.
chefo
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,285
And1: 2,427
Joined: Apr 29, 2009

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1826 » by chefo » Fri Apr 9, 2021 9:41 pm

I'll just point out the obvious--if Lauri manages to score 10 ppg in the paint going forward at 75%, combined with chucking 6 3's / game at 40%, you're better off keeping him, even with a hefty price tag.

We've ragged on him for 4 years that he's not taking his posterior inside and punishing the tiny ones. If he starts doing it consistently, watch out, because the only thing stopping him from becoming a really nice scorer would be system and usage.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,130
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1827 » by WindyCityBorn » Fri Apr 9, 2021 9:43 pm

Grodoboldo wrote:
coldfish wrote: Dallas would be a great fit for him as would LA. The Bulls simply don’t have the top end talent that some teams do and as a result, need more from their supporting players.


I would like a S&T for Tim Hardaway Jr, and would absolutely LOVE one for Josh Richardson (though I don't see any reason why Dallas would do it, since he really fits their team well).


We don’t need a $20 million dollar 6th man in Hardaway. He is just a worse LaVine.
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,692
And1: 6,944
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1828 » by GoBlue72391 » Fri Apr 9, 2021 10:45 pm

E-DC wrote:Lauri's Shooting at the Rim
2017-18: .676
2018-19: .624
2019-20: .648
2020-21: .750

Lauri's Layup Percentage
2017-18: .483
2018-19: .511
2019-20: .496
2020-21: .584

Lauri's Hook Shot Percentage
2017-18: .320 (8-25)
2018-19: .200 (6-30)
2019-20: .462 (12-26)
2020-21: .900 (9-10)
By any chance are you able to find out his percentages on post up opportunities?

Sent from my SM-S115DL using RealGM mobile app
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 10,692
And1: 6,944
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1829 » by GoBlue72391 » Fri Apr 9, 2021 10:54 pm

Ice Man wrote:Ten hooks for the year? He should be getting 10 per week. Well maybe being with Thad will rub off on Lauri. He should be crushing in the paint the tiny tots that so many teams assign to guard him.
If Lauri can ever become even half the post up player Thad is then he's a multi-time all star easy, even if he adds nothing else to his game.

The ability to exploit mismatches has always been one of the biggest things in terms of unlocking his potential, with the biggest being his passiveness though the two are tied together, so hopefully this is the beginning of that. We need to continue getting him the ball against mismatches in the post. 18-22 minutes just isn't enough when he's playing like this.

A Lauri who shoots 38%+ from 3 on high volume, 70%+ on at the rim attempts, and can consistently exploit mismatches by blowing by bigger, slower defenders and posting up smaller, weaker players is the player we've always wanted him to be. Not to mention he's looked a lot better on defense recently.

Sent from my SM-S115DL using RealGM mobile app
ZOMG
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,434
And1: 3,269
Joined: Dec 31, 2013

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1830 » by ZOMG » Fri Apr 9, 2021 10:59 pm

Zach Lowe in his latest column:

One thing to watch: Vucevic is rolling to the rim slightly more often in Chicago now that he has a ball handler in LaVine who regularly draws two defenders, and he's a good passer on the move. Vucevic doesn't have as much space with Young lurking around the paint, but the floor is wide open with Markkanen at power forward.


https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31215089/ten-nba-things-like-including-nuggets-devastating-stars

This is very true. Thad and Vuc have been an awkward pair from the start. The decision to move Lauri to the bench before he'd had any chance to find chemistry with Vucevic was truly perplexing.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,299
And1: 9,154
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1831 » by sco » Fri Apr 9, 2021 11:41 pm

ZOMG wrote:Zach Lowe in his latest column:

One thing to watch: Vucevic is rolling to the rim slightly more often in Chicago now that he has a ball handler in LaVine who regularly draws two defenders, and he's a good passer on the move. Vucevic doesn't have as much space with Young lurking around the paint, but the floor is wide open with Markkanen at power forward.


https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31215089/ten-nba-things-like-including-nuggets-devastating-stars

This is very true. Thad and Vuc have been an awkward pair from the start. The decision to move Lauri to the bench before he'd had any chance to find chemistry with Vucevic was truly perplexing.

Thad and Lauri should both be coming off the bench, the guy to pair with Vuc is Theis. Lauri has convinced me that he's less effective when he is our 3rd option on the floor. Coming off the bench, he is more of a #1, and he's playing against lesser defenders.
:clap:
E-DC
Sophomore
Posts: 166
And1: 182
Joined: Jul 25, 2017
         

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1832 » by E-DC » Sat Apr 10, 2021 12:09 am

GoBlue72391 wrote:
E-DC wrote:Lauri's Shooting at the Rim
2017-18: .676
2018-19: .624
2019-20: .648
2020-21: .750

Lauri's Layup Percentage
2017-18: .483
2018-19: .511
2019-20: .496
2020-21: .584

Lauri's Hook Shot Percentage
2017-18: .320 (8-25)
2018-19: .200 (6-30)
2019-20: .462 (12-26)
2020-21: .900 (9-10)
By any chance are you able to find out his percentages on post up opportunities?

Sent from my SM-S115DL using RealGM mobile app

I don't have that data. Maybe someone else can provide it.
User avatar
TheGOATRises007
RealGM
Posts: 21,506
And1: 20,153
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
         

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1833 » by TheGOATRises007 » Sat Apr 10, 2021 2:35 am

He plays with no fire and his help defense is atrocious.

It's just so disappointing watching him after those 1st two seasons.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,130
And1: 11,815
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1834 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Apr 10, 2021 3:16 am

Back to the Lauri that makes him such a divisive player.
madvillian
RealGM
Posts: 22,117
And1: 9,176
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1835 » by madvillian » Sat Apr 10, 2021 3:43 am

Get this bum off the team. We need dogs on the court and guys that bring it every night.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.


I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
ZOMG
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,434
And1: 3,269
Joined: Dec 31, 2013

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1836 » by ZOMG » Sat Apr 10, 2021 8:34 am

sco wrote:
ZOMG wrote:Zach Lowe in his latest column:

One thing to watch: Vucevic is rolling to the rim slightly more often in Chicago now that he has a ball handler in LaVine who regularly draws two defenders, and he's a good passer on the move. Vucevic doesn't have as much space with Young lurking around the paint, but the floor is wide open with Markkanen at power forward.


https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31215089/ten-nba-things-like-including-nuggets-devastating-stars

This is very true. Thad and Vuc have been an awkward pair from the start. The decision to move Lauri to the bench before he'd had any chance to find chemistry with Vucevic was truly perplexing.

Thad and Lauri should both be coming off the bench, the guy to pair with Vuc is Theis. Lauri has convinced me that he's less effective when he is our 3rd option on the floor. Coming off the bench, he is more of a #1, and he's playing against lesser defenders.


No he's not. Coby White is clearly both the #1 AND #2 option for the bench squad.

They don't look for Lauri any more in the 2nd unit than they did when he was the starter. The difference is that the bench squad doesn't have two guys with sky high usage and "featured" roles set in stone, so Lauri gets at least some touches by default.

I have no idea why Billy is letting Coby "run" the 2nd unit. He cannot do it, he's not an NBA point guard. I don't care who he plays with. His decision making is truly awful and often he simply plays selfishly.
the ultimates
Analyst
Posts: 3,671
And1: 1,616
Joined: Jul 06, 2012

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1837 » by the ultimates » Sat Apr 10, 2021 12:20 pm

For people who say Lauri should be involved more in the offense please say how, when, and where he should get the ball. This nebulous be more involved in the offense stuff is bs. Let's break it down. Does he put the ball on the floor and create for himself or others? No. Does he post up well and score consistently? No. Half of his shots are from three. It's a shot he can't get for himself so he depends on others getting him the ball on pick and pop and penetrating. A player that limited in how he scores is not someone you run plays for or through.

I don't want to question people's basketball intelligence but damn. Look around the league whether it's good offensive teams or bad offensive teams, teams that play at a fast pace or slow as molasses nobody is saying let's give those types of players a bigger role on offense. He's a role player. Role players get their points by feeding off stars and number one or two options not because they have plays run for them or the excuse of they need to be involved more.
Losing to get high draft picks and hoping they turn into franchise players is not some next level, genius move. That's what teams want to happen in any rebuild/tank or whatever you want to market it as.
Hugi Mancura
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,936
And1: 1,174
Joined: Dec 05, 2017

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1838 » by Hugi Mancura » Sat Apr 10, 2021 4:12 pm

E-DC wrote:
GoBlue72391 wrote:
E-DC wrote:Lauri's Shooting at the Rim
2017-18: .676
2018-19: .624
2019-20: .648
2020-21: .750

Lauri's Layup Percentage
2017-18: .483
2018-19: .511
2019-20: .496
2020-21: .584

Lauri's Hook Shot Percentage
2017-18: .320 (8-25)
2018-19: .200 (6-30)
2019-20: .462 (12-26)
2020-21: .900 (9-10)
By any chance are you able to find out his percentages on post up opportunities?

Sent from my SM-S115DL using RealGM mobile app

I don't have that data. Maybe someone else can provide it.


That hook shot percentage is weird. Where you got it?

Post-up (by nba.com):
2020-21: .690
2019-20: .389
2018-19: .370
2017-18: .416

This year Lauri has bulls best post-up numbers from current players. Vuc is second with .636 (his numbers in Orlando were much worse). Lauri is in 93.8% percentile of all NBA players.

PnR big, will use efg% because pick&pop:
2020-21: .488
2019-20: .463
2018-19: .578
2017-18: .523

Overall Bulls big's have awful numbers in this. Example Vuc had .489 with Orlando and 1.14ppp. His Bulls numbers so far .433 and 0.84ppp. Best with Bulls is Valentine with .700 (power of pick & pop)

PnR ballhandler:
2020-21: 0.625
2019-20: 0.643
2018-19: 0.397
2017-18: 0.450

Best with Bulls and in 97.2 percentile in all of the NBA.

These are very little sample, so use it with grain of salt. But real question is should player with these statistics get more opportunities to do these things?
Louri
Senior
Posts: 631
And1: 351
Joined: Jun 28, 2017

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1839 » by Louri » Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:04 pm

It seems that Finnish media thinks that Bulls offered 15 million a year to Lauri. I still don't remember if it's confirmed anywhere? I've just read that "they were 4 millions apart". Any source?

His agent also said that Lauri is still dealing with that shoulder injury. "Something he had to fight through and still fights through. It's not something that goes away quickly." I think that's just excuse tho and problem is mostly mental.
"Larry Nance Jr is better than Lauri Markkanen" -RealGM 2021
ZOMG
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,434
And1: 3,269
Joined: Dec 31, 2013

Re: Lauri Markkanen Discussion Thread 

Post#1840 » by ZOMG » Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:12 pm

Louri wrote:It seems that Finnish media thinks that Bulls offered 15 million a year to Lauri. I still don't remember if it's confirmed anywhere? I've just read that "they were 4 millions apart". Any source?

His agent also said that Lauri is still dealing with that shoulder injury. "Something he had to fight through and still fights through. It's not something that goes away quickly." I think that's just excuse tho and problem is mostly mental.


What problem?

Regarding the shoulder - I agree that if you can play, you can play. Same goes for LaVine. People were still making excuses for him because of the ankle thing, and then he effortlessly exploded for a head-at-rim-level dunk. Oops.

Markkanen is clearly healthy enough to contribute. Now we just need to find someone to pass him the ball. That's no small task.

Return to Chicago Bulls