High potential, but there's zero chance we take any international prospects for the next few years
Plus he doesn't seem to be much of a scorer.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
cgf wrote:bleedblue3303 wrote:Can someone please be so kind and tell me what happened to Scottie Lewis. Wasn't he top 5 recruit coming out of highschool. Didn't hear much about him last year of this year.
He hit a ceiling offensively in college and couldn't take the next step with his skill level to break through it. Kid's still a ton of fun to watch defend and his shot's come along well enough to profile as a quality role player, but what on-ball potential people may have once thought he had is now definitely gone.
I still like him a lot for what he is, but a more defensively-dynamic version of Bullock is pretty much his best-case scenario.
bleedblue3303 wrote:cgf wrote:bleedblue3303 wrote:Can someone please be so kind and tell me what happened to Scottie Lewis. Wasn't he top 5 recruit coming out of highschool. Didn't hear much about him last year of this year.
He hit a ceiling offensively in college and couldn't take the next step with his skill level to break through it. Kid's still a ton of fun to watch defend and his shot's come along well enough to profile as a quality role player, but what on-ball potential people may have once thought he had is now definitely gone.
I still like him a lot for what he is, but a more defensively-dynamic version of Bullock is pretty much his best-case scenario.
Could the scheme or coaching or team have hindered him? I remeber watching video of him in high school thinking this kid is going to be amazing. I hope there's still a chance for him. Even thought defensive-dynamic Bullock is still a nice career. Hoping the kid reaches greatness.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
High potential, but there's zero chance we take any international prospects for the next few years
Plus he doesn't seem to be much of a scorer.
newyorker4ever wrote:
I'm all about going for J.Giddey.
HEZI wrote:Just took a peak at tankathon to kind of get an idea of what the lotto looks like corrently and realized that Orlando currently has two top 10 picks thanks to the Bulls. What were the Bulls thinking with that awful trade? They still suck and gave up a bunch of assets for Vucevic who hasn't made them any better and is over 30? Anyway nice job Orlando, they even have a high 2nd rounder this year.

knickstape4ever wrote:HEZI wrote:Just took a peak at tankathon to kind of get an idea of what the lotto looks like corrently and realized that Orlando currently has two top 10 picks thanks to the Bulls. What were the Bulls thinking with that awful trade? They still suck and gave up a bunch of assets for Vucevic who hasn't made them any better and is over 30? Anyway nice job Orlando, they even have a high 2nd rounder this year.
the pick is top 4 protected
I don't think it's an awful trade at all considering that if the Bulls end up in the lottery, they still have a shot at a top 4 pick. and if they don't land a top 4 pick, chances are that whoever the Magic take at 9/10 is not gonna have the same type of impact that Vuc will have
HEZI wrote:Just took a peak at tankathon to kind of get an idea of what the lotto looks like corrently and realized that Orlando currently has two top 10 picks thanks to the Bulls. What were the Bulls thinking with that awful trade? They still suck and gave up a bunch of assets for Vucevic who hasn't made them any better and is over 30? Anyway nice job Orlando, they even have a high 2nd rounder this year.
HEZI wrote:knickstape4ever wrote:HEZI wrote:Just took a peak at tankathon to kind of get an idea of what the lotto looks like corrently and realized that Orlando currently has two top 10 picks thanks to the Bulls. What were the Bulls thinking with that awful trade? They still suck and gave up a bunch of assets for Vucevic who hasn't made them any better and is over 30? Anyway nice job Orlando, they even have a high 2nd rounder this year.
the pick is top 4 protected
I don't think it's an awful trade at all considering that if the Bulls end up in the lottery, they still have a shot at a top 4 pick. and if they don't land a top 4 pick, chances are that whoever the Magic take at 9/10 is not gonna have the same type of impact that Vuc will have
What impact did Vuc provide though? Orlando looks about the same as they did before trading him and Chicago looks the same, maybe even worse now especially defensively, as they did before getting him. Orlando should have started their rebuild sooner, I thought they waited too long but they finally came to their senses and made the obvious move. Chicago, terrible move. If they were a piece away I'd get it but they weren't and should have just waited for a better player to put their chips in for. They need to hope that the pick somehow jumps into the top 4 and there's a very slim chance that happens.

jvsimonetti0514 wrote:HEZI wrote:Just took a peak at tankathon to kind of get an idea of what the lotto looks like corrently and realized that Orlando currently has two top 10 picks thanks to the Bulls. What were the Bulls thinking with that awful trade? They still suck and gave up a bunch of assets for Vucevic who hasn't made them any better and is over 30? Anyway nice job Orlando, they even have a high 2nd rounder this year.
It was a panic move to try to entice Lavine to stay. He put up 50 points last night and they still lost. What makes it even worse they’re giving up another pick on top of this lottery pick. That roster still stinks even with Vuc and basically no way to upgrade it either. They’ve really made our life much easier if we’re planning to target Lavine next year in free agency.

knickstape4ever wrote:HEZI wrote:knickstape4ever wrote:
the pick is top 4 protected
I don't think it's an awful trade at all considering that if the Bulls end up in the lottery, they still have a shot at a top 4 pick. and if they don't land a top 4 pick, chances are that whoever the Magic take at 9/10 is not gonna have the same type of impact that Vuc will have
What impact did Vuc provide though? Orlando looks about the same as they did before trading him and Chicago looks the same, maybe even worse now especially defensively, as they did before getting him. Orlando should have started their rebuild sooner, I thought they waited too long but they finally came to their senses and made the obvious move. Chicago, terrible move. If they were a piece away I'd get it but they weren't and should have just waited for a better player to put their chips in for. They need to hope that the pick somehow jumps into the top 4 and there's a very slim chance that happens.
Vuc is a legit 2nd option. before they didn't have one. some nights it would be Lauri, some nights Coby, but both are too inconsistent
Bulls will get better. they're still learning to play w/ each other after adding 3 new rotation players
realistically is the player selected at 9/10 gonna have the same impact as Vuc? probably not, especially not over the next 2-3 years
knickstape4ever wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:HEZI wrote:Just took a peak at tankathon to kind of get an idea of what the lotto looks like corrently and realized that Orlando currently has two top 10 picks thanks to the Bulls. What were the Bulls thinking with that awful trade? They still suck and gave up a bunch of assets for Vucevic who hasn't made them any better and is over 30? Anyway nice job Orlando, they even have a high 2nd rounder this year.
It was a panic move to try to entice Lavine to stay. He put up 50 points last night and they still lost. What makes it even worse they’re giving up another pick on top of this lottery pick. That roster still stinks even with Vuc and basically no way to upgrade it either. They’ve really made our life much easier if we’re planning to target Lavine next year in free agency.
the picks are protected
late lotto picks aren't likely gonna have the same impact as Vuc, who's an all-star
if the Bulls don't make the playoffs, that pick is gonna be in the 9-11 range. currently ESPN has Franz Wagner, Scottie Barnes, and Isaiah Jackson as players 9-11. Vuc is a higher impact player than any of those guys right away. Barnes has some nice upside, but he's also got a major hole in his game (shooting). for the next 2-3 years, Vuc likely makes them better than anyone taken in that range
HEZI wrote:knickstape4ever wrote:HEZI wrote:
What impact did Vuc provide though? Orlando looks about the same as they did before trading him and Chicago looks the same, maybe even worse now especially defensively, as they did before getting him. Orlando should have started their rebuild sooner, I thought they waited too long but they finally came to their senses and made the obvious move. Chicago, terrible move. If they were a piece away I'd get it but they weren't and should have just waited for a better player to put their chips in for. They need to hope that the pick somehow jumps into the top 4 and there's a very slim chance that happens.
Vuc is a legit 2nd option. before they didn't have one. some nights it would be Lauri, some nights Coby, but both are too inconsistent
Bulls will get better. they're still learning to play w/ each other after adding 3 new rotation players
realistically is the player selected at 9/10 gonna have the same impact as Vuc? probably not, especially not over the next 2-3 years
They traded Wendell Carter Jr. and two first round picks for a 30 year old center who doesn't move the needle for them. I think if they were more patient they could have done better with those assets even use Lauri as part of a bigger trade for better value overall.

HEZI wrote:knickstape4ever wrote:HEZI wrote:
What impact did Vuc provide though? Orlando looks about the same as they did before trading him and Chicago looks the same, maybe even worse now especially defensively, as they did before getting him. Orlando should have started their rebuild sooner, I thought they waited too long but they finally came to their senses and made the obvious move. Chicago, terrible move. If they were a piece away I'd get it but they weren't and should have just waited for a better player to put their chips in for. They need to hope that the pick somehow jumps into the top 4 and there's a very slim chance that happens.
Vuc is a legit 2nd option. before they didn't have one. some nights it would be Lauri, some nights Coby, but both are too inconsistent
Bulls will get better. they're still learning to play w/ each other after adding 3 new rotation players
realistically is the player selected at 9/10 gonna have the same impact as Vuc? probably not, especially not over the next 2-3 years
They traded Wendell Carter Jr. and two first round picks for a 30 year old center who doesn't move the needle for them. I think if they were more patient they could have done better with those assets even use Lauri as part of a bigger trade for better value overall.

knickstape4ever wrote:HEZI wrote:knickstape4ever wrote:
Vuc is a legit 2nd option. before they didn't have one. some nights it would be Lauri, some nights Coby, but both are too inconsistent
Bulls will get better. they're still learning to play w/ each other after adding 3 new rotation players
realistically is the player selected at 9/10 gonna have the same impact as Vuc? probably not, especially not over the next 2-3 years
They traded Wendell Carter Jr. and two first round picks for a 30 year old center who doesn't move the needle for them. I think if they were more patient they could have done better with those assets even use Lauri as part of a bigger trade for better value overall.
I'm a big Wendell fan, but he wasn't playing well. I just don't see the 9th/10th pick being used on a player who'd have the same impact as Vuc for the next few years