ImageImageImageImageImage

Is RJ Barrett a beast?

Moderators: j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O

Is RJ Barrett a bust?

Yes
119
34%
No
228
66%
 
Total votes: 347

User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 56,660
And1: 45,878
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1001 » by dakomish23 » Sun Apr 11, 2021 2:42 am

Chanel Bomber wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?

Agreed on all points (but one).

But for me the point about the vets is about which type of vets do you bring in. Players who have been in the trenches and who can play and off the ball to give the kids the space they need to develop, or ball-dominant career losers who will decide the fate of the team? And will the organization hold these vets accountable or cater to them because of some misguided old-school principle that standing on its own is actually devoid of substance?

Bullock, Burks and Noel have done wonders for this team this season because they mostly play within their role, and they do it quite well. Bullock and Noel for instance don't compromise RJ's usage. A guy like Payton on the other hand puts a ceiling on Quickley's playing time and on RJ's usage without actually helping the team.

My point is, not all mediocre journeyman vets are created equal.

Bullock yes. That’s why nobody was against the 2nd version of his contract. We could of used all the remaining cap space on assets and still signed him - it was an exception. A some 3 & some D guy is always a solid small investment.

Burks is a gunner given too big a role. Reduce his role and id like him a 100x better. He’s not that good for the role he’s given.

Noel is a rim protector and literally nothing else. He’s a huge detriment on offense. One of the worst PnR men in the NBA. Not just eye test, stats back that up. He’s not a good rebounder. He can block shots. That’s it.

They haven’t done wonders. They sometimes meet their inflated roles and more often have not. We won’t miss them when they’re gone.

Just like we didn’t miss any of the other journeymen who’ve been here the last few years.

There is no world I would rather have the journeymen vets than the assets.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Spoiler:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1592147&start=1720#p57345128

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 15,764
And1: 13,430
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A new land of openness, freedom, and defense for all.

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1002 » by BKlutch » Sun Apr 11, 2021 3:59 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:47% 3FG is Elite

So IOW, RJ = Steve Novak + Defense + Assists + Rebounds + Bully Ball + Attitude

Plus he can move - something Novak never did LOL
.

__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________


Offense propelled by our Brunson Burner. Defense powered by OG, our after-burner.
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

.
.
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 15,764
And1: 13,430
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A new land of openness, freedom, and defense for all.

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1003 » by BKlutch » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:03 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?

Agreed on all points (but one).

But for me the point about the vets is about which type of vets do you bring in. Players who have been in the trenches and who can play and off the ball to give the kids the space they need to develop, or ball-dominant career losers who will decide the fate of the team? And will the organization hold these vets accountable or cater to them because of some misguided old-school principle that standing on its own is actually devoid of substance?

Bullock, Burks and Noel have done wonders for this team this season because they mostly play within their role, and they do it quite well. Bullock and Noel for instance don't compromise RJ's usage. A guy like Payton on the other hand puts a ceiling on Quickley's playing time and on RJ's usage without actually helping the team.

My point is, not all mediocre journeyman vets are created equal.

Very well said.
.

__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________


Offense propelled by our Brunson Burner. Defense powered by OG, our after-burner.
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

.
.
User avatar
SelbyCobra
General Manager
Posts: 9,668
And1: 18,266
Joined: May 25, 2011

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1004 » by SelbyCobra » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:07 pm

jvsimonetti0514 wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is the most stunning development of this season for me - I had extremely low hope for his shooting - and I'm enjoying it so much.
Image
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,188
And1: 4,252
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1005 » by seren » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:09 pm

Had the Knicks drafted better, we would be somewhere else. Knox, Frank, Obi - three lottery picks that we botched. Gotta invest in scouts
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 22,776
And1: 33,934
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1006 » by TheGreenArrow » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:19 pm

Read on Twitter


Please close this thread!!!!!

The fact that this is still a topic is disappointing!!!

Be better guys/gals!!!!!

BE BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NewYorkOrNoWhere!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Gravy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,924
And1: 7,781
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1007 » by Gravy » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:24 pm

dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?


If they won more games in 2018 and 2019-20 they could have had Zion and Lamelo.

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019

You already said signing Morris is what got us IQ
NewKnicks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 756
Joined: Feb 03, 2021

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1008 » by NewKnicks » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:43 pm

dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?


Don't forget we drafted Obi over Hali. We drafted Knox over SGA and Mikal Bridges. We drafted Frank over Donavan Mitchell and Bam.

Imagine adding 1-2 of those players? Wow, what could have been.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 35,310
And1: 49,126
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
   

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1009 » by robillionaire » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:43 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Please close this thread!!!!!

The fact that this is still a topic is disappointing!!!

Be better guys/gals!!!!!

BE BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I give you all the credit you were on board from day 1 and never doubted him for a second that's the power of positivity in action folks
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 35,310
And1: 49,126
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
   

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1010 » by robillionaire » Sun Apr 11, 2021 4:44 pm

Gravy wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?


If they won more games in 2018 and 2019-20 they could have had Zion and Lamelo.

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019

You already said signing Morris is what got us IQ


We didn't even need to win or lose more games to get lamelo we easily could have traded pretty much nothing for him but leon rose was in love with toppin
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 56,660
And1: 45,878
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1011 » by dakomish23 » Sun Apr 11, 2021 5:41 pm

Gravy wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?


If they won more games in 2018 and 2019-20 they could have had Zion and Lamelo.

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019

You already said signing Morris is what got us IQ


We did it right in 18-19. I didn’t complain when we got #3. Go pull up the lottery day thread. I said we should be happy with whatever we get b/c we did it the right way and it will pay for us. Guess what? It did.

Who got the #1 pick in 2020? Who got the #2 pick? Conveniently left those out

The remaining cap space outside of Morris and Randle. I thought that was implied but I could have been more implicit
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Spoiler:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1592147&start=1720#p57345128





Read on Twitter






Read on Twitter


Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 56,660
And1: 45,878
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1012 » by dakomish23 » Sun Apr 11, 2021 5:41 pm

robillionaire wrote:
Gravy wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?


If they won more games in 2018 and 2019-20 they could have had Zion and Lamelo.

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019

You already said signing Morris is what got us IQ


We didn't even need to win or lose more games to get lamelo we easily could have traded pretty much nothing for him but leon rose was in love with toppin


You think this is real?
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Spoiler:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1592147&start=1720#p57345128





Read on Twitter






Read on Twitter


Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 56,660
And1: 45,878
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1013 » by dakomish23 » Sun Apr 11, 2021 5:47 pm

BKlutch wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?

Agreed on all points (but one).

But for me the point about the vets is about which type of vets do you bring in. Players who have been in the trenches and who can play and off the ball to give the kids the space they need to develop, or ball-dominant career losers who will decide the fate of the team? And will the organization hold these vets accountable or cater to them because of some misguided old-school principle that standing on its own is actually devoid of substance?

Bullock, Burks and Noel have done wonders for this team this season because they mostly play within their role, and they do it quite well. Bullock and Noel for instance don't compromise RJ's usage. A guy like Payton on the other hand puts a ceiling on Quickley's playing time and on RJ's usage without actually helping the team.

My point is, not all mediocre journeyman vets are created equal.

Very well said.


How’d this thinking work out in 2019 FA? It didn’t.

Journeymen come and go, hence the name.

You’ll fall right out of love with these guys the second they’re gone and new journeymen replace them. Just like past journeymen
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Spoiler:
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1592147&start=1720#p57345128





Read on Twitter






Read on Twitter


Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 22,776
And1: 33,934
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1014 » by TheGreenArrow » Sun Apr 11, 2021 6:02 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
Gravy wrote:
If they won more games in 2018 and 2019-20 they could have had Zion and Lamelo.


You already said signing Morris is what got us IQ


We didn't even need to win or lose more games to get lamelo we easily could have traded pretty much nothing for him but leon rose was in love with toppin


You think this is real?


We could have got him two ways...

1.trade Mitch the 8th pick and 1 of the Dallas picks to the hornets for the 3 pick and possibly 1 of their unwanted contracts.

2. Mitch, knox frank the 8th pick and the 2023 Dallas picks to the warriors for the 2nd pick and Wiggins.

Either deal in hindsight I would do in a heartbeat.

Lamelo Rj Randle core with capspace this summer would be way better than what we have right now!!!!!
NewYorkOrNoWhere!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 35,310
And1: 49,126
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
   

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1015 » by robillionaire » Sun Apr 11, 2021 6:06 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
We didn't even need to win or lose more games to get lamelo we easily could have traded pretty much nothing for him but leon rose was in love with toppin


You think this is real?


We could have got him two ways...

1.trade Mitch the 8th pick and 1 of the Dallas picks to the hornets for the 3 pick and possibly 1 of their unwanted contracts.

2. Mitch, knox frank the 8th pick and the 2023 Dallas picks to the warriors for the 2nd pick and Wiggins.

Either deal in hindsight I would do in a heartbeat.

Lamelo Rj Randle core with capspace this summer would be way better than what we have right now!!!!!


we could have probably got him dozens of ways, the timberwolves were allegedly trying to trade the 1st pick up until a minute to go on their draft clock who knows what they would have taken
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 15,764
And1: 13,430
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A new land of openness, freedom, and defense for all.

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1016 » by BKlutch » Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:25 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
BKlutch wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:Agreed on all points (but one).

But for me the point about the vets is about which type of vets do you bring in. Players who have been in the trenches and who can play and off the ball to give the kids the space they need to develop, or ball-dominant career losers who will decide the fate of the team? And will the organization hold these vets accountable or cater to them because of some misguided old-school principle that standing on its own is actually devoid of substance?

Bullock, Burks and Noel have done wonders for this team this season because they mostly play within their role, and they do it quite well. Bullock and Noel for instance don't compromise RJ's usage. A guy like Payton on the other hand puts a ceiling on Quickley's playing time and on RJ's usage without actually helping the team.

My point is, not all mediocre journeyman vets are created equal.

Very well said.


How’d this thinking work out in 2019 FA? It didn’t.

Journeymen come and go, hence the name.

You’ll fall right out of love with these guys the second they’re gone and new journeymen replace them. Just like past journeymen

Morris helped us quite a bit after we traded him. We had bad management and coaching. The team was bad so there was no way FAs wanted to join us. Our image is changing this year.
.

__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________


Offense propelled by our Brunson Burner. Defense powered by OG, our after-burner.
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

.
.
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 22,322
And1: 37,762
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1017 » by Chanel Bomber » Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:58 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?

Agreed on all points (but one).

But for me the point about the vets is about which type of vets do you bring in. Players who have been in the trenches and who can play and off the ball to give the kids the space they need to develop, or ball-dominant career losers who will decide the fate of the team? And will the organization hold these vets accountable or cater to them because of some misguided old-school principle that standing on its own is actually devoid of substance?

Bullock, Burks and Noel have done wonders for this team this season because they mostly play within their role, and they do it quite well. Bullock and Noel for instance don't compromise RJ's usage. A guy like Payton on the other hand puts a ceiling on Quickley's playing time and on RJ's usage without actually helping the team.

My point is, not all mediocre journeyman vets are created equal.

Bullock yes. That’s why nobody was against the 2nd version of his contract. We could of used all the cap space on assets and still signed him - it was an exception. A some 3 & some D guy is always a solid small investment.

Burks is a gunner given too big a role. Reduce his role and id like him a 100x better. He’s not that good for the role he’s given.

Noel is a rim protector and literally nothing else. He’s a huge detriment on offense. One of the worst PnR men in the NBA. Not just eye test, stats back that up. He’s not a good rebounder. He can block shots. That’s it.

They haven’t done wonders. They sometimes meet their inflated roles and more often have not. We won’t miss them when they’re gone.

Just like we didn’t miss any of the other journeymen who’ve been here the last few years.

There is no world I would rather have the journeymen vets than the assets.

It appears I agree about the idea of accumulating assets but I disagree about the extent to which you're willing to go in order to accomplish that. For me it's all about finding the right balance and identifying the right type of vets that you're willing to bring in.

Young players need to have vets around them to guide them on the court and off the court and also to help them be competitive so they can play in games that matter.

Burks fills a role that no one else on the roster can take on: a guard who can create his own shot in any situation and also spot-up and hit threes. His role isn't inflated, he's just the only player who's proven he can fill this role. Not to mention, the team plays well with him on the court, as evidenced by his +5.4 net rating, third best mark on the team among rotation players. You say he's a gunner yet he has a very respectable TS% of 56.3. What do you want, Thibs to reduce his role because he's actually making the team better within his role? What sort of precedent does this set? I don't know, I sense some form of cognitive dissonance here.

You want someone better than Burks for his role? Then you're gonna have to spend more than $6 million a year, maybe triple that amount. Are you willing to do that? Burks is a bargain for his level of production.

Noel might be a weak rebounder, and he might have terrible hands on offense, but he's doing an admirable job on defense and he's passable on offense, since he barely takes any shots. Yes, Mitch is better, but Mitch is injured, and Noel - as a back-up (which he should be) was simply upgraded to a starter. I really don't understand the complaint about Noel. Whose path is he blocking? Obi's? He's not an NBA center at this stage in his career, not until he can defend in space and protect the rim.
User avatar
BugginOut
Head Coach
Posts: 7,470
And1: 7,829
Joined: May 25, 2014
   

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1018 » by BugginOut » Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:34 pm

Read on Twitter


Good insight in what RJ will be working on the next two off-seasons with his trainer Drew Hanlen

Ask Hanlen what Barrett will look to add to his game this coming summer and the trainer to the stars quickly lays out a multi-year plan that will touch on every aspect of Barrett’s offensive arsenal. This coming summer the focus will be on adding the ability to shoot threes off the dribble and on the move.

Part of Barrett’s improvement this season has been focusing on taking advantage of open catch-and-shoot opportunities. The next step is to be dangerous either coming off screens or pulling up off the dribble against sagging defenders.

As well, more attention will be given to adding some shiftiness to Barrett’s dribble-drive game as defenders have to honour his shooting.

Finally – likely heading into his fourth season –the goal will be developing a more varied package of shots to finish at the rim in traffic.

“We look at it in phases because we only have so much time to work together in the off-season,” says Hanlen. “We’d rather master one thing rather than spread ourselves thin and become decent at a lot of things.”
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 84,670
And1: 120,651
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1019 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:45 pm

BugginOut wrote:
Read on Twitter


Good insight in what RJ will be working on the next two off-seasons with his trainer Drew Hanlen

Ask Hanlen what Barrett will look to add to his game this coming summer and the trainer to the stars quickly lays out a multi-year plan that will touch on every aspect of Barrett’s offensive arsenal. This coming summer the focus will be on adding the ability to shoot threes off the dribble and on the move.

Part of Barrett’s improvement this season has been focusing on taking advantage of open catch-and-shoot opportunities. The next step is to be dangerous either coming off screens or pulling up off the dribble against sagging defenders.

As well, more attention will be given to adding some shiftiness to Barrett’s dribble-drive game as defenders have to honour his shooting.

Finally – likely heading into his fourth season –the goal will be developing a more varied package of shots to finish at the rim in traffic.

“We look at it in phases because we only have so much time to work together in the off-season,” says Hanlen. “We’d rather master one thing rather than spread ourselves thin and become decent at a lot of things.”

I remember when rj struggled to start the season everybody was going at Hanlen. Hanlen said he had to block a bunch of Knicks fans :lol:

Great to hear that’s what they’re gonna work on this summer though. That’s what will take him to that level of star sim if he can create jumpers off the dribble
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
Meat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,975
And1: 4,666
Joined: Jun 30, 2013
     

Re: Is RJ Barrett a bust? 

Post#1020 » by Meat » Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:51 pm

NewKnicks wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Can we take a moment to reflect on just how well things go for the Knicks when you do the things you’re supposed to do?

They traded Melo to kickstart the rebuild - got Mitch

They played the kids & lived with the result - got RJB

They went after a younger guy who could be a part of the future - got Randle

They traded the well playing vet in a losing year - got IQ

Imagine where we’d be if they had

A. Used the remaining cap space on assets instead of mediocre journeymen vets in 2019
B. Played the kids & lives with the results in 19-20

It’s so rare we do it but when we make the normal decision, it pays off for us. How many arguments did we have on all these things?


Don't forget we drafted Obi over Hali. We drafted Knox over SGA and Mikal Bridges. We drafted Frank over Donavan Mitchell and Bam.

Imagine adding 1-2 of those players? Wow, what could have been.

1)butterfly effect

2)you’ve got no clue how those players would have developed being drafted by the Knicks. I mean you look at Knox or even Frank’s stroke and wonder how they aren’t 40% 3pt shot makers and scratch your head. Maybe they’re drafted my Utah or mia realize their potential

Return to New York Knicks