Odinn21 wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:5. '18-19 Joel Embiid - a force of nature, putting him in even though the superior '20-21 is ineligible.
I do appreciate the votes for Schayes, but I can't honestly say I think he was better than the 5 above.
Also want to give a shout out to Wilt's '67 teammates (Greer, Walker, Cunningham) and Moses & Erving's '83 teammates (Jones, Cheeks, Toney) along with the iconic AI.
I agree that 2021 Embiid (if he wouldn't suffer from anything) would be a clear cut choice.
Though I think it's quite a race between Embiid, Schayes, Iverson and Cunningham. (Greer and Walker feel a step down respectively)
Embiid had durability issues. Also there's a trade off between 2019 and 2020 versions. 2019 version was quite high in RAPM, 2020 version not so much. But he definitely had a better postseason showing in 2020.
With Iverson, durability is not an issue. He was consistent throughout the season in 2001. I think his edge in motor is bigger than Embiid's edge in quality.
Cunningham was a top 5 player in 1970. Right after Kareem, West, Frazier and Reed. That's quite the company. Considering their position to the top players, Cunningham looks better than Iverson I guess? 26/14/4 in regular season with slightly above average efficiency. Despite the slightly low W numbers, he led the Sixers to top 3 SRS in the season. Then 29/10/4 in playoffs. The only major drawback is his turnover numbers in ABA suggest that he was more turnover prone than he should've been.
TBH, I'm always too sceptical about the '50s because my knowledge about the decade is so little compared to the '60s or onwards. That was why I initially went with Iverson over Schayes.
Makes sense in general. I saw it as a clear cut Top 4 and then just didn't feel comfortable taking the other guys ahead of Embiid, but I could certainly be wrong.
With Cunningham, there's a part of me that wants to rank him higher than I do in general, but a couple things give me pause.
First, post-Wilt, Cunningham only ever won 1 playoff series (Against a 30 win Nets team in the year between Barry's departure and Erving's arrival), and his teams lost series to teams with worse RS records 3 times.
I'm a big ABA guy and really don't like dismissing guys based on the idea that the ABA made them look better than they actually were, but I've always been struck by the fact that Cunningham's big ABA MVP year ended with his best-record in the RS team losing to another team that didn't win the title. One incident is not necessarily damning, and I respect Cunningham a lot, but I think Cunningham's legacy would be a lot stronger if he'd actually led team to series victories against serious opponents, and they really didn't do that.
Now, you might say that neither has Embiid, and you've got a point, but Embiid did terrify the hell out of the team that would go on to win the title in '18-19, and in that off-season I really felt like no one looked at Embiid as anything other than a top tier superstar. With Cunningham, I feel I need to move him down a peg from there.
Re: Iverson. I can see arguments for Iverson over Embiid as well, but I suppose the reality is that at this point I'm just not a believer in what AI was doing. (In 2001, AI was my favorite player and I was cheering for him, so this isn't what I've always thought.)