Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
Moderator: ijspeelman
Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
-
- Cold Hard Gameday Facts
- Posts: 15,519
- And1: 8,943
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
- Location: France
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
easy loss probably means they fn win it
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,584
- And1: 32,172
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
I hate it when I am right
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
- yoyoboy
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,599
- And1: 18,804
- Joined: Jan 29, 2015
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
Saw this one coming ugh.
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,655
- And1: 4,392
- Joined: Dec 08, 2009
Re: Game 70: Boston Celtics (35-34) @ Cleveland Cavaliers (21-48) - 8:00PM
This is how the end of the season goes ... the Celtics just didn't care about winning this one as their seeding is pretty much established.