3JS wrote:DaGawd wrote:Not that I planned on going but the ticket prices to catch a playoff game at MSG are nuts
How much?
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
3JS wrote:DaGawd wrote:Not that I planned on going but the ticket prices to catch a playoff game at MSG are nuts
cgmw wrote:blueNorange wrote:knicks gotta be careful, don't think for a second the hawks team haven't been hearing for weeks how the knicks want them in the playoffs because they view them as an easier road to the next round.
they'll coming out inspired and guns blazing, i trust thibs will have them prepared.
the hawks are good, it feels like we're not acknowledging it.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but Hawks are the Vegas favorite to win the series. Something like 55% chance.
mpharris36 wrote:K-DOT wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:
I saw it was -13 on basketball reference too. Guess either way still pretty bad for his 17 min or whatever.
I dont even pay too much attention to +/- or small sample sizes but with Payton its just hard to ignore how we are always worse with him on the floor. Last game is the one I can remember, and from what I recall he seemed to be constantly losing Trae around the floor.
I think individual game +/- is a pretty useless stat, and a lot of advanced stats don't work over a 3 game sample, either
But talking about +/-, Elfrid was by far the worst on the team with -98 total (which was 446th in the NBA)
Next worse was Frank at -34, and our only other starter in the negatives was Noel, at -2
Every other starter (Bullock, RJ, and Randle), as well as Burks, Rose, Taj, and Quick (who actually led the team with +182), were all at least +107. Even Obi was overall a +25. Elfrid (-98), Mitch (-17), and Noel (-2) were the only 3 players with more than 500 minutes played this year to have less than a +25.
Also I don't know if this has had any effect but being "mr situational" Frank really hasn't even gotten a chance to play offense the last 2 months. If you are just a defensive specialist its really tough to have a positive +/-...you either are either 0 or you are a minus if you are only playing one side of the ball.
If you are playing with the starters on a team that was #4 in the East...its pretty crazy to have such a negative impact over the curse of an entire season.
?
delvec19 wrote:Can't believe were here. Still surreal to me. But LFGK!!!
I don't think this will be as easy as most, my prediction is Knicks in 6.
makeitstop wrote:cgmw wrote:blueNorange wrote:knicks gotta be careful, don't think for a second the hawks team haven't been hearing for weeks how the knicks want them in the playoffs because they view them as an easier road to the next round.
they'll coming out inspired and guns blazing, i trust thibs will have them prepared.
the hawks are good, it feels like we're not acknowledging it.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but Hawks are the Vegas favorite to win the series. Something like 55% chance.
They mentioned it on the Kay show, Bet MGM has ATL at 59%.
We'll be underdogs until the very end. So be it.

cgmw wrote:mpharris36 wrote:K-DOT wrote:I think individual game +/- is a pretty useless stat, and a lot of advanced stats don't work over a 3 game sample, either
But talking about +/-, Elfrid was by far the worst on the team with -98 total (which was 446th in the NBA)
Next worse was Frank at -34, and our only other starter in the negatives was Noel, at -2
Every other starter (Bullock, RJ, and Randle), as well as Burks, Rose, Taj, and Quick (who actually led the team with +182), were all at least +107. Even Obi was overall a +25. Elfrid (-98), Mitch (-17), and Noel (-2) were the only 3 players with more than 500 minutes played this year to have less than a +25.
Also I don't know if this has had any effect but being "mr situational" Frank really hasn't even gotten a chance to play offense the last 2 months. If you are just a defensive specialist its really tough to have a positive +/-...you either are either 0 or you are a minus if you are only playing one side of the ball.
If you are playing with the starters on a team that was #4 in the East...its pretty crazy to have such a negative impact over the curse of an entire season.
I’m really hoping sanity takes over this week and Thibs sits down Elf for a talk about his “sore ankle” that will keep him out but available.
And then my god just play the French defensive freak 6 minutes vs Trae to start the game. He should get at least one open corner 3, and if he hits it, the entire game (and potentially series) changes.
3JS wrote:3JS wrote:DaGawd wrote:Not that I planned on going but the ticket prices to catch a playoff game at MSG are nuts
How much?
snadler wrote:delvec19 wrote:Can't believe were here. Still surreal to me. But LFGK!!!
I don't think this will be as easy as most, my prediction is Knicks in 6.
Easy? nothing has come easy for this franchise in 40 years
RShahNyC89 wrote:3JS wrote:3JS wrote:
How much?
a G to get in the door it looks like
anyone see dates?
?
In time for the playoffs beginning this weekend, the Knicks and Nets have been freed up to drastically increase arena capacity at Madison Square Garden and Barclays Center, respectively.
In a news conference at Radio City Music Hall, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo announced that with 50% of the arenas being set aside for fully vaccinated fans with no need for social distancing. Madison Square Garden chairman James Dolan estimated that the Knicks would be able to bring approximately 13,000 fans into the arena.


?
Chanel Bomber wrote:Underrated storyline:
RJ gets his first taste of the playoffs at 20.
IQ gets his first taste of the playoffs at 21.
Obi gets his first taste of the playoffs at 23.
Knicks fans get their first taste of the playoffs at age 8.
Mitch is unfortunately injured, but for those of us (like me) who always wanted to build through the draft, this is huge.
