BK_2020 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a viable Stevens replacement, because Rajon Rondo isn't.
Antoine Walker
Ha ha--good one!
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
BK_2020 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a viable Stevens replacement, because Rajon Rondo isn't.
Antoine Walker
Curmudgeon wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a viable Stevens replacement, because Rajon Rondo isn't.
Curmudgeon wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a viable Stevens replacement, because Rajon Rondo isn't.
BK_2020 wrote:JHTruth wrote:LuckyLeprechaun wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/golden-state-warriors-luxury-tax-bill-explodes-after-trade-for-kelly-oubre/ar-BB1bbD4v
Says it's this year.
No. They made the Wiggins trade last year to get under the tax to avoid the repeater this year. They will almost certainly move Oubre this summer to avoid it next year
Oubre is a UFA.
                                                                                           
               BK_2020 wrote:GSW are $30 mil. over the tax with 12 guys on the roster with a potential top 5 pick and a late lottery pick to add. They are definitely not getting under the tax.
And no, they weren't under the tax this season either.
JHTruth wrote:BK_2020 wrote:GSW are $30 mil. over the tax with 12 guys on the roster with a potential top 5 pick and a late lottery pick to add. They are definitely not getting under the tax.
And no, they weren't under the tax this season either.
So maybe we have the first team willing to pay the repeater in NBA history. The repeater DOUBLES their already MASSIVE tax bill. For an 8 seed
![]()
                                                                                           
               cloverleaf wrote:JHTruth wrote:BK_2020 wrote:GSW are $30 mil. over the tax with 12 guys on the roster with a potential top 5 pick and a late lottery pick to add. They are definitely not getting under the tax.
And no, they weren't under the tax this season either.
So maybe we have the first team willing to pay the repeater in NBA history. The repeater DOUBLES their already MASSIVE tax bill. For an 8 seed
![]()
I don't think it kicks in until next year--and even then only if they don't make moves to get under the tax:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmurray/2021/03/14/why-the-golden-state-warriors-salary-cap-might-force-them-to-make-a-big-trade/?sh=325563ad4960
                   
                   
                   
                                                    JHTruth wrote:BK_2020 wrote:GSW are $30 mil. over the tax with 12 guys on the roster with a potential top 5 pick and a late lottery pick to add. They are definitely not getting under the tax.
And no, they weren't under the tax this season either.
So maybe we have the first team willing to pay the repeater in NBA history. The repeater DOUBLES their already MASSIVE tax bill. For an 8 seed
![]()
                                                                                           
               celtics543 wrote:JHTruth wrote:BK_2020 wrote:GSW are $30 mil. over the tax with 12 guys on the roster with a potential top 5 pick and a late lottery pick to add. They are definitely not getting under the tax.
And no, they weren't under the tax this season either.
So maybe we have the first team willing to pay the repeater in NBA history. The repeater DOUBLES their already MASSIVE tax bill. For an 8 seed
![]()
Are they an 8 seed though if Klay is back? I'm not sure when he's due back but it would seem if you added Klay to this roster they'd be significantly better.
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               Curmudgeon wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a viable Stevens replacement, because Rajon Rondo isn't.
Curmudgeon wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a viable Stevens replacement, because Rajon Rondo isn't.

                                                                                                          31to6 wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to suggest a viable Stevens replacement, because Rajon Rondo isn't.
James Posey, 100% serious
now that we've made the playoffs though, I fully expect Brad to be back. Hope the team gets its health and mojo back!

                   
                   
                                                       
               ParticleMan wrote:and this thread not aging well lol.