TunaFish wrote:NuggetsWY wrote:Gordon may be our best defender but he will not be the best choice to cover Lillard - that's my opinion and that of many other people.
Gobert is the best defender on the Jazz, but that doesn't mean he is the best choice to cover Kyrie Irving. Scottie Pippen was arguably the best defender on the Jordan-Bulls but he was hardly the best defender against Jabbar.
Just saying ...
This lines up with my thinking. You will see multiple screens to free up Dame and peel off Denver's guards. That leaves Gordon and he has a reputation for being one of the best perimeter defensive players in the league. He is not Gobert trying to guard a center but Gordon is ideal for switching onto a shooting guard particularly because the Blazer are starting a 6'3" small forward, so Denver guards and Gordon will be switching a lot.
The modern NBA (and somewhat throughout history) has always been about screens to free up shooters. So bigs end up trying to cover smalls and vice versa. You are totally correct in my opinion, that Gordon is better than many bigs, but many teams will switch back as quickly as possible so matchups are better. The Nuggets don't do that very often. So our bigs spend more time trying to cover quicker players. It can be disastrous but truthfully it can work out - with solid team/help defense (another thing Denver just isn't so good at IMO).
I just disagree with your statement "one of the best perimeter defensive players". Can we modify that to "one of the best perimeter defensive front court players"? I do believe that is probably what you meant - or am I wrong. (Because I think we are saying the same thing.)