Am2626 wrote:CobyWhite0 wrote:kulaz3000 wrote:
When he had Durant and Westbrook sure, but Thib's also had MVP Rose and a pretty deep roster. And you also have to consider that Billy was also in the Western Conference.
BD coached OKC for 5 years, 8 All-Stars
TT coached CHI for 5 years, 8 All-Stars
TT coached MIN for 2 years, 2 All-Stars (both the same season)
TT coached NYK for 1 years, 1 All-Stars
BD coached Durant, CP3, and SGA (in his 2nd season) for 1 year each. He coached PG13 for 2 years. The one year he coached KD, they took the 73-win Warriors to 7 games in the WC Finals.
And obviously, BD coached in the much tougher conference. 
Thibs' 1st season in Minnesota, Vegas had their over/under at 41.5, and they were predicted to win 40-42 games by the major publications. They only won 31, and I'm pretty sure BD has never had a team underachieve to that level.Just my opinion, but I'm quite confident that the Chicago Bulls currently have a better head coach than the New York Knicks.
 
You are saying that a team that finished 29-53 the previous year was supposed to win 41 games bringing back pretty much the same roster the following year? I think those Vegas Odds had more to do with Thibs coming over to Minnesota than the actual roster and talent of that team. Anyone thinking that Timberwolves team was supposed to win that many games would be out of their mind especially in a dominant Western Conference during that era.
 
I'm not saying it - Vegas said it. ESPN said it. Bleacher Report said it:
_________________________
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2664038-nba-predictions-2016-17-win-loss-projections-for-every-team-pre-training-campHow can you not get excited about the Minnesota Timberwolves? Each of the following players is reason enough to tune into a Minnesota broadcast, which should quickly become one of the nation's League Pass favorites:
Karl-Anthony Towns was so good as a rookie that we're already comfortable calling him a top-20 player, even if he's only tapped a tiny percentage of his ginormous potential. 
Zach LaVine blossomed into a sharp-shooting offensive stud as soon as the 'Wolves realized he was best suited in an off-ball role. Oh, and he's pretty decent at dunking. 
Andrew Wiggins is brimming over with upside on both ends of the court and should come far closer to his status as a generational prospect entering his third professional season. 
Ricky Rubio's becoming a tremendously underrated point guard as he pairs his dazzling passing skills with a better spot-up jumper and great defensive instincts. 
Kris Dunn should assert himself as a defensive ace and great playmaker during his rookie season.
And that's saying nothing of Nemanja Bjelica (one of the best shooters casual fans have never heard of) and Gorgui Dieng (a defensive stud with a burgeoning offensive game who would break out if he were given more opportunities). Plus, you can throw in the depth-aiding additions of Cole Aldrich and Co., 
as well as the most effective move of all: replacing Sam Mitchell with Tom Thibodeau as the head coach. There are many reasons 
everyone is predicting a leap from these young 'Wolves. 
==================================================================
Also if Thibs is coaching this year’s Bulls team the Bulls are easily in the playoffs. Depending on what happens with the top 4 draft pick possibilities not sure if that would have been the best long term thing for the Bulls but Thibs gets this Bulls team in the playoffs.
You are saying that a team that finished 22-43 the previous year was supposed to make the playoffs bringing back pretty much the same roster the following year?   
 So it's completely crazy to think Thibs could get the 2016-17 Wolves to increase their winning percentage by .146 "bringing back pretty much the same roster"?
Yet you're 100% certain that Thibs could EASILY get the 2020-21 Bulls to increase their winning percentage by .120 "bringing back pretty much the same roster"?
Don't you think there's some major hypocrisy in those 2 statements?
And that .120 increase is just to get to the #10 seed, you're still 2 road wins away from the playoffs. If you want to "easily" make the playoffs (i.e. the #6 seed, avoiding the play-in), we would have had to increase our winning percentage by .218 - we'd need an increase of .134 to make the 8th seed.