Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
god shammgod wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
If Dame doesn't want to play with Randle...Randle will be on the next flight out.
I highly doubt that. You don’t trade a talent like Randle.
You try to build with him. We’d be better served going after lonzo and pairing him with Julius!!!
Lonzo&Randle would be a much better fit imo!!!!
would you stop
Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Future Knick Lillard with the step back. Chanel in shambles
I caught myself thinking "that was nice" for a nanosecond and then I remembered we're at war so F Dame and his 0 Finals appearances.
mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:
I highly doubt that. You don’t trade a talent like Randle.
You try to build with him. We’d be better served going after lonzo and pairing him with Julius!!!
Lonzo&Randle would be a much better fit imo!!!!
would you stop
I think its his shtick...have the worst takes known to man.
ENYK wrote:mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:
would you stop
I think its his shtick...have the worst takes known to man.
The sad part is, this is the logic the organization will inevitably try to feed the fanbase when they extend Randle and sign Lonzo out of desperation.
Knicks fandom... always absurd never sublime.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
ENYK wrote:Oscirus wrote:god shammgod wrote:
they're aaron gordons on denver but without the defense. they'd get 6 shots a game.
Rj being a spreader and solely a spreader for someone setting him up easily gets 20 a night. Randle is harder to argue cuz they play the same position and the defense would be atrocious with them out there so hed be relieving joker as opposed to there at the same time as.
Sham is right, RJ gets those shots because they need someone to take them... On Denver he probably doesn't see the floor much. His defensive lapses are so bad and so consistent he's often unplayable. I hope he just gets to good 3 and D level, forget stardom... would be more than happy with a solid 3 and D player.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:ENYK wrote:Oscirus wrote:Rj being a spreader and solely a spreader for someone setting him up easily gets 20 a night. Randle is harder to argue cuz they play the same position and the defense would be atrocious with them out there so hed be relieving joker as opposed to there at the same time as.
Sham is right, RJ gets those shots because they need someone to take them... On Denver he probably doesn't see the floor much. His defensive lapses are so bad and so consistent he's often unplayable. I hope he just gets to good 3 and D level, forget stardom... would be more than happy with a solid 3 and D player.
Do you just pull things out of your ass just to support your hatred? This is getting beyond ridiculous at this point
ENYK wrote:Oscirus wrote:ENYK wrote:
Sham is right, RJ gets those shots because they need someone to take them... On Denver he probably doesn't see the floor much. His defensive lapses are so bad and so consistent he's often unplayable. I hope he just gets to good 3 and D level, forget stardom... would be more than happy with a solid 3 and D player.
Do you just pull things out of your ass just to support your hatred? This is getting beyond ridiculous at this point
Who the f*** are you, and why catch feelings over some opinions... When RJ cracks a 14 PER let's talk, otherwise shut the f*** up... he's a stationary jump shooter and inconsistent defender, nothing more nothing less.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
robillionaire wrote:This place gets spicy after a playoff series loss glad I’m here for it
- can you imagine getting in an argument over a man named Rowan??Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
god shammgod wrote:
drummond is the lakers payton
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Oscirus wrote:
Thats gotta be embarrassing. On the plus side, we'll be able to get drummond next year on da chip
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Oscirus wrote:ENYK wrote:Oscirus wrote:Do you just pull things out of your ass just to support your hatred? This is getting beyond ridiculous at this point
Who the f*** are you, and why catch feelings over some opinions... When RJ cracks a 14 PER let's talk, otherwise shut the f*** up... he's a stationary jump shooter and inconsistent defender, nothing more nothing less.
Bitch get the **** off my mentions then. DId rowan **** your girl or something? Why are you over here hunting down **** that has nothing to do with you. When Im ready to make you my bitch next year then we can talk, but for now, stay out of grown folks conversation.
god shammgod wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
If Dame doesn't want to play with Randle...Randle will be on the next flight out.
I highly doubt that. You don’t trade a talent like Randle.
You try to build with him. We’d be better served going after lonzo and pairing him with Julius!!!
Lonzo&Randle would be a much better fit imo!!!!
would you stop
