snadler wrote:This win a chip or nothing else matters is annoying. only 1 team wins a ring, and the nets who have a big 3 might not even get there this year with the bucks being a tough test, would that mean it's a mistake for them to get harden. The knicks aren't going from 41 wins to a championship. How about getting Dame, being a really good team and then see if we can keep adding pieces. If the knicks can get Dame you don't hesitate, if he doesn't want to leave then you move on.
Because it makes no sense to go all in if you have no shot at winning. It would be worse than the Melo trade. Here we’d be giving up all our picks and youth for MAYBE 3 years of prime Dame. If we don’t have another max free agent we aren’t winning anything.
You say you’d rather see a good team with Dame, but I’d rather see if we could develop the youth and build a good team. I’d rather have a young 6th seed team with potential to grow than a 4th seed with its best player over 30, that is capped out, has no picks, and no room to trade to get better.