Hal14 wrote:playa-hater wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:We didn't draft Robert Williams for his three point shooting. Garuba has an NBA body and a 7-2 wingspan and can defend multiple positions. The shot will develop in time. Last year he improved his three point shooting from 30% to 33%. If he can get to 36% next year that's good enough for a 20 year old.
The draft is full of nay sayers when it comes to international players. Garuba is a fantastic athlete but isn't skilled enough. Prkacin, who is still only 18 years old, is highly skilled but isn't athletic enough. And so it goes. They said Luka Doncic wasn't athletic either.
Semi + Yabusele had an NBA body. Not saying he is that. Just saying I am not too high on him. he currently is listed at 6'8.. may have to be a center until he becomes a strong shooter. Which may or may not happen. I love his switch-ability potential. But I have said this quite a bit since joining, I put on strong emphasis on having strong shooting potential vs a capable shooter for perimeter positions. There are exceptions of course (Giddy?) Centers not included of course.
C'mon now. How can you watch a video like this and think Semi is even a close comparison to Garuba?
Garuba makes some insane blocks, at age 19. Semi didn't block a single shot all season, at age 26.
The closer comparison I am seeing for Garuba is Draymond Green. The focus on defense and rebounding rather than being a ball dominant scorer. The hustle, the tenacity on D. Having good focus and positioning on D and when rebounding. On offense, more of a focus on setting screens, playing off the ball, making some excellent passes, finding the open man quickly after he gets the ball. Scoring on 3's off ball movement, or on lobs off PnR, or dunks on dump downs. Very similar to Green, Garuba is 2 inches taller though and further along in terms of strong frame/defense instincts/passing instincts/shooting compared to Green when he was 19.
Garuba turned 19 this season. The season Green turned 19 was his freshman year at Michigan State. Let's compare Green at age 19 vs Garuba at age 19:
Green = 0% from 3 (0/1), 61.5% FT, 55.6% FG
Garuba = 31.6% from 3 (37/117), 63% FT, 48.1% FG
The FG% of 48.1 is low, but the year before that in 19-20 Garuba's FG% was 59%
At age 19, Green barely got mins off the bench for Michigan State as a freshman. At age 19, Garuba is starting PF for the 2nd best team in the EuroLeague, which is the most competitive league in the world after the NBA.
IMO Garuba is the best defender in the draft. These are some of the elite defenders in the draft from what I've seen:
Garuba = excellent defender, on perimeter as well as interior..and even has shown good hustle on chase down blocks
Wagner = damn good perimeter defender, not as good defending bigs inside
Mitchell = NCAA defensive player of the year. Tenacious defender, smart defender, but not as versatile. Defends the heck out of little guys, not sure how well he can switch onto guys over 6'6" which is a huge amount of NBA players
Queta = insanely good interior defender, rim protector. Good at hustling for chase down blocks on the break. Struggles a bit though when he has to switch onto guards/wings out on perimeter
Jackson = excellent rim protector, good (but not great) at switching out, quick and has good hustle to get back in transition D, only 206 lbs though so likely to struggle defending/rebounding inside vs bigger centers
Springer = hell of a perimeter defender, scrappy, hustles, gets good position on D. Does a decent job when switched onto bigs but still not great in that aspect though, since he's just 6'4" and 204 lbs.
Suggs - same as Springer, basically