Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
Theocy wrote:Parliament10 wrote:jonige94 wrote:Hope they dont hire a coach just because they have a certain skin colour or gender, i want them to hire the most competent person regardless of what physical attributes they have.
Officially Warned.
This is Prejudicial, and goes against our Zero Tolerance policy.
~ Parl
? That post is by definition not prejudicial. Are we saying we hire someone because of skin colour?
GuyClinch wrote:Theocy wrote:Parliament10 wrote:Officially Warned.
This is Prejudicial, and goes against our Zero Tolerance policy.
~ Parl
? That post is by definition not prejudicial. Are we saying we hire someone because of skin colour?
Are you not familiar with the woke movement? Not considering race is racist.
Garbanzo wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:ajones9219 wrote:
Im not pulling for Pierce to get the job but he got a raw deal. Dealt with a huge slew of injuries that basically resolved itself right after he got canned. The injuries made it look a LOT worse than it was.
This piece also brings up the issue that Pierce was giving a young team a lot of freedom (to screw up) and that they’ve done better because McMillan has provided more structure:
https://www.theringer.com/nba/2021/4/15/22385033/atlanta-hawks-trae-young-nate-mcmillan
And that's why I think Brad likes him.
Anyway Pierce's offensive philosophy is more rigid than Brad's and it may work well for the Celtics.
I hope Cassel will be the next HC, but wouldn't mind Pierce or Billups.
Triple M wrote:Lawson
Cassell
Billups
Stackhouse
I would love any of the 4. I don't know any of them beneath the surface, but I feel Lawson and Billups have a general intelligence that can fit with Brad.
Parliament10 wrote:GuyClinch wrote:Theocy wrote:
? That post is by definition not prejudicial. Are we saying we hire someone because of skin colour?
Are you not familiar with the woke movement? Not considering race is racist.
Zero Tolerance Policy
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2087387
watsonthedragon wrote:Parliament10 wrote:GuyClinch wrote:
Are you not familiar with the woke movement? Not considering race is racist.
Zero Tolerance Policy
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2087387
Can you explain how his post goes against this policy? He’s literally saying skin color should not come into play...
SmartWentCrazy wrote:watsonthedragon wrote:Parliament10 wrote:Zero Tolerance Policy
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2087387
Can you explain how his post goes against this policy? He’s literally saying skin color should not come into play...
Because what **** relevance does skin color or sex have to do with anything. No one here has suggested anyone unqualified for the job. So why is he bringing it up?
Answer: We all know why. Its to imply the people being suggested arent qualified and are being mentioned because theyre black and/or have a vagina. Lets stop pretending he wasnt doing what we all know he was doing.
Bohemian wrote:Maybe Brad is waiting for Clippers or Sixers to be eliminated. Apparently we can't talk to Billups or Cassell as long as their season is still in play, right?
SmartWentCrazy wrote:watsonthedragon wrote:Parliament10 wrote:Zero Tolerance Policy
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2087387
Can you explain how his post goes against this policy? He’s literally saying skin color should not come into play...
Because what **** relevance does skin color or sex have to do with anything. No one here has suggested anyone unqualified for the job. So why is he bringing it up?
Answer: We all know why. Its to imply the people being suggested arent qualified and are being mentioned because theyre black and/or have a vagina. Lets stop pretending he wasnt doing what we all know he was doing.
jonige94 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:watsonthedragon wrote:
Can you explain how his post goes against this policy? He’s literally saying skin color should not come into play...
Because what **** relevance does skin color or sex have to do with anything. No one here has suggested anyone unqualified for the job. So why is he bringing it up?
Answer: We all know why. Its to imply the people being suggested arent qualified and are being mentioned because theyre black and/or have a vagina. Lets stop pretending he wasnt doing what we all know he was doing.
Lol, yeah, i was totally implying that, it's just hard to admit you're wrong, i know.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:jonige94 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Because what **** relevance does skin color or sex have to do with anything. No one here has suggested anyone unqualified for the job. So why is he bringing it up?
Answer: We all know why. Its to imply the people being suggested arent qualified and are being mentioned because theyre black and/or have a vagina. Lets stop pretending he wasnt doing what we all know he was doing.
Lol, yeah, i was totally implying that, it's just hard to admit you're wrong, i know.
You were, and now youre acting like a child and throwing a tantrum cuz youre upset about it.
jonige94 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:jonige94 wrote:Lol, yeah, i was totally implying that, it's just hard to admit you're wrong, i know.
You were, and now youre acting like a child and throwing a tantrum cuz youre upset about it.
Oh no, my life is ruining because two sensitive people can't interpret english!!1111111
jonige94 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:jonige94 wrote:Lol, yeah, i was totally implying that, it's just hard to admit you're wrong, i know.
You were, and now youre acting like a child and throwing a tantrum cuz youre upset about it.
Oh no, my life is ruining because two sensitive people can't interpret english!!1111111
jayu70 wrote:Garbanzo wrote:Andrew McCeltic wrote:
This piece also brings up the issue that Pierce was giving a young team a lot of freedom (to screw up) and that they’ve done better because McMillan has provided more structure:
https://www.theringer.com/nba/2021/4/15/22385033/atlanta-hawks-trae-young-nate-mcmillan
And that's why I think Brad likes him.
Anyway Pierce's offensive philosophy is more rigid than Brad's and it may work well for the Celtics.
I hope Cassel will be the next HC, but wouldn't mind Pierce or Billups.
Hawks fan here:
It wasn't just the losing record that got Pierce fired, it was losing too many games in the 4th quarter when they had big enough leads.
The biggest reason for his firing though was his approach to Trae, not so much on the court since his system showcased, he was hard on Trae which Trae didn't mind but I think this and others situations like this (the Olympic team) is where he really lost Trae.
This is the Official Hawks Play by Play guy in this interview:
?s=20
jonige94 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:watsonthedragon wrote:
Can you explain how his post goes against this policy? He’s literally saying skin color should not come into play...
Because what **** relevance does skin color or sex have to do with anything. No one here has suggested anyone unqualified for the job. So why is he bringing it up?
Answer: We all know why. Its to imply the people being suggested arent qualified and are being mentioned because theyre black and/or have a vagina. Lets stop pretending he wasnt doing what we all know he was doing.
Lol, yeah, i was totally implying that, it's just hard to admit you're wrong, i know.
