TD75 wrote:- The Bucks are not contenders. I have been saying this all season long. The roster is not constructed to challenge for the championship and the coaching staff is absolutely incapable of handling a full postseason.
- Giannis: I do not know why he plays the way he does, but pretty much everyone knows that the Point Forward dream is basically over. He is not skilled enough but most importantly he can not read the basketball game at a high enough level to play the role of a playmaker in a championship winning team. Someone needs to persuade him to play more like an agile and skilled big, and less like an under-skilled but fast point guard who can not shoot at a distance. The Bucks apparently have no one to challenge Giannis to change (I believe because they chose to, see discussion about Bud later in the post).
- Jrue: He is a piece of the puzzle. Not skilled enough to the degree he can dominate an elite team. Skilled enough (in my opinion) to be a very good playmaker and guard the star of the other team. He is not a high volume scorer (do not ask him to be something he never was).
- Khris: Great scorer from distance (who insists on getting closer to the basket instead of playing at the 3 point line), who plays as if he is a very good playmaker. He is not a very good playmaker. He is an average at best playmaker who needs to find his rhythm (do not tell me about his assist numbers, I do not care). He is not as good a defender as many consider him to be . In fact I claim that he is possibly average (do not tell me about whatever defensive metric you decide to use, I do not care). He needs to change his playstyle dramatically to be a major part of a championship team. I have no confidence he will do so.
- DDV: People may start (once again) overvaluing DDV as a player for the Bucks, simply because he is not playing vs Brooklyn. You are absolutely wrong if you think DDV being available would have changed anything but mostly inconsequential minor details. He is not a starter for a championship team (at any position) and his game in offense is severely lacking. His value is mostly as a player who tries and he is very good at that. He does a lot of the little things very well and that is it.
- Brook: If having Brook in the lineup automatically means that you play this rigid drop defense, then automatically Brook can not play in a championship team. The current evolution of the game makes him usable in very specific ways. That is not easy to deal with in a championship team.
- Bud: In the NBA there are very few very good coaches. By very good, I mean at all aspects of coaching (mentality, long term strategy, in game tactics, preparation before the game, schemes). In my opinion, Bud is not one of them. For the past two years I am at a loss for words when people are asking: "Who are the Bucks going to replace Bud with?". Do you really think it is impossible to find someone to place 5 squares on the floor? Seriously now, there are great coaches available, but the NBA franchises (and many fans) are terrible at understanding 1) the value of a great coach and 2) the characteristics of a great coach. Also many NBA franchises are not willing to hire coaches that will challenge their star players, which is a recipe for mediocrity.
====================
Specific comments:
- The idea that someone (possibly even Giannis) came up with a routine that takes more than 5 seconds at the Free Throw line has me at a loss for words. He should take the free throw the moment the ball is in his hands. This is obvious, but apparently obvious concepts are difficult for this team. Which brings me to my next point.
- Why are obvious concepts so difficult for this team? From in game concepts/tactics, to not taking one-pass contested 3s, to running PnRs without Giannis as the ballhandler, to completing a trade or draft selections without (potentially) messing it up, etc (most of you probably know many more examples).
If you are looking for reasons why the Bucks are not contending for the championship, there are plenty of them. Most have to do with the fact that they seem unable to get out of their own way.
Solid breakdown

























