Adelheid wrote:If a team is interested in Randle, you trade him without second guessing.
Bundle in Knox as well.
But, for what? You left out that part of the equation
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Adelheid wrote:If a team is interested in Randle, you trade him without second guessing.
Bundle in Knox as well.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
spree2kawhi wrote:There's nothing there really:
Westbrook
Hield
RJ
Randle
Noel
Sexton
RJ
Bullock
Randle
Turner
Sexton
RJ
Grant
Randle
Noel
Well, to me it is already a hopeless situation. We should have tanked. I don't see us turn into a contender in any way. Instead we've already entered treadmill decade number 3. Maybe we should trade Randle for a young up and coming player and picks. Randle for Wiseman and the Minnesota pick is only one example. Randle for Jaylen Brown. But apart from that I see no way to go.
RJ for Dame would turn us into a bigtime contender. Portland isn't doing that though. If they do, there's a lot to get out of the situation. Nurkic, Powell, Melo, Covington... with this on mind, Portland may instead be interested in acquiring Randle. If the return was legit, maybe in a three team deal with many picks involved, they could have:
Dame
Powell
Covington
Randle
Nurkic
CJ to a third team that wants to take the leap (say GSW/NOP/Mem/Chi/Min), while we cash in on major picks and youth.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:NoLayupRule wrote:wall could be a fascinating addition
if hes healthy hes a monster
and if hes under reasonable contract
I do think we are going to add a pg leader who can be depended on to create for himself and others
Wall, Lowry, Schrooder, Ball
One of these guys will be here
I also think we will be talking to Butler and Kawhai
not sure if we can get them but Kawhai might bounce after this years pathetic showing
john wall hasn't been able to stay healthy in 4 years and has a terrible contract. the only reasonable guy there is probably lowry but i'm guessing he'd want more years than he'd be worth. disastrous pg crop this year
TBri1974 wrote:What would you guys think of some version of this:
Porzingis and a re-signed Frank to Boston
Knox to Dallas
Walker, Pritchard, Nesmith and the Boston 1st to NY
Dallas gets free agency space to build around Luka
Boston exchanges Walker for a still productive Porzingis - who fits a need there
NY gets 2 young players and a 1st rounder for taking on 2 years of Walker's contract.
NY would need a follow up trade as we don't want all young players and draft picks, but it gives us the capital to move around (for instance we could then trade one of Boston's players, one of our first rounders and the #32 pick for Grant from Detroit, and still have 2 1st round picks and a starting PG
Walker/Rose/Luka (Argentina)
RJ/IQ/Nesmith/Bullock
Grant/RJ/Bullock
Randle/Toppin/Grant
Mitch/Paelle/Gibson
And that is before considering the 2 1st rounders - at least 1 of which we'd likely use on the best PG available.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Adelheid wrote:If a team is interested in Randle, you trade him without second guessing.
Bundle in Knox as well.
But, for what? You left out that part of the equation
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
TBri1974 wrote:I love Jaylen Brown, he's one of the few players in the league I would go all in on (picks, youth, etc.). I don't think we have what they would want. I don't even think Lilard is what they want. They would want a good fit next to Tatum, which means a talented big. Maybe, just maybe, they would accept Randle and RJ for Brown, but I doubt it (I would do that trade) and that would leave us very thin.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
cgf wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Adelheid wrote:If a team is interested in Randle, you trade him without second guessing.
Bundle in Knox as well.
But, for what? You left out that part of the equation
Exactly.
Chanel Bomber wrote:cgf wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
But, for what? You left out that part of the equation
Exactly.
The Warriors could have two lottery picks in this year's draft. I don't know that they can afford to develop two rookies next season with Klay coming back.
They seem like logical trade partners, I think there can be a deal to be made there, should the Knicks actually decide to sell high (from their perspective) on Julius.
Knicks should consider all other avenues as well, including how to build a non-treadmill team around Julius.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
cgf wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:cgf wrote:Exactly.
The Warriors could have two lottery picks in this year's draft. I don't know that they can afford to develop two rookies next season with Klay coming back.
They seem like logical trade partners, I think there can be a deal to be made there, should the Knicks actually decide to sell high (from their perspective) on Julius.
Knicks should consider all other avenues as well, including how to build a non-treadmill team around Julius.
If the Minny pick is on the table for Julius & we can squeeze them for a swap with #14, then there's a differnt discussion to behad because you are right, every avenue should be explored...but I don't think that knock out offer is out there this summer. Maybe if Julius signed the 4yr extension, before coming back & showing that he can deliver in the playoffs, it would be next year...but after the series he just had with only 1 year left on his contract, I don't think it's there now.
In a different world, I think adding Julius & Robinson for Wiseman & their picks would be great for GSW and let the splash bros contend again...as Julius could do a lot of Draymond things while alongside those two, while also carrying the offensive load when they got their rest, and having Mitch anchoring things when Draymond is resting would be scary defensively...but after how bad Julius was, I don't think they make an offer that comes close to making our FO consider it.
DaGawd wrote:I can’t realistically see the FO essentially deciding to start all over by trading Randle for a top 5 pick as enticing as that might be as a fan
snadler wrote:DaGawd wrote:I can’t realistically see the FO essentially deciding to start all over by trading Randle for a top 5 pick as enticing as that might be as a fan
Please explain why a team would trade a top 5 pick for basically a free agent in Randle?
snadler wrote:DaGawd wrote:I can’t realistically see the FO essentially deciding to start all over by trading Randle for a top 5 pick as enticing as that might be as a fan
Please explain why a team would trade a top 5 pick for basically a free agent in Randle?
NYK-Mentality85 wrote:I'd hate to trade for Dame while losing our younger talents in Quickley, Obi and Mitch + multiple 1st round picks!
It'll be Melo era all over again (who I loved).
Just imagine if we kept Felton/Wilson Chandler and GALLO by simply signing Melo as a Free Agent the following offseason?!? We would've eliminated Indiana and advanced to the E.C.F during 2012-2013!
I rather keep all of our homegrown youthful hope, all of our 1st round picks and just sign Kawhi Leonard as a free Agent!
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.