Bogyo wrote:Simmons is signed through 2025, and will be making 40 mill that year. :O
His contract might be worse than Wall's.
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Bogyo wrote:Simmons is signed through 2025, and will be making 40 mill that year. :O
lilfishi22 wrote:He's elite on one side of the floor and because of his inability to shoot (from range or from FT line), he's just become so exploitable. Even if he doesn't become a good shooter, as long as he gets to the point where he's not exploitable on that side of the floor then he's certainly playing up to his contract.
I don't know if it's reworking his shot, shooting right handed or seeing a sports psychologist, or a combination of the three but he's doing himself a massive disservice by doing none of those things.
AtheJ415 wrote:BobbieL wrote:King4Day wrote:
If they lose this game, he's gone this summer. I still see a McCollum for Simmons type deal taking place.
I just replied to a tweet with this trade. Great minds think alike
Sixers need to do something
This will sound hot takey but it isn't. Simmons is criminally overrated. He has a reputation as this elite playmaker who can pass incredibly well but he's not. He mostly just initiates offense by dribbling up the court, passing to the side, and rotating to the dunk spot. He doesn't run pick & roll, doesn't get others open, doesn't really do much of anything on offense creatively except in transition, where you have numbers and most would make the easy / correct read. His contract is insane for a Draymond type player, who only works with the greatest shooting backcourt of all time and even then I wouldn't call Draymond a net positive player anymore. Steph would've averaged 40 if Draymond didn't allow the easy double every play.
I honestly wouldn't trade Cam Johnson for Simmons if the salaries were equal. He's not a 3 and D player. He's a defensive role player who is petrified of shooting and is only a good playmaker compared to his position / height. So is Dario, and Dario ain't all that. If Simmons would at least drive to the hoop and use his height / athleticism to make layups or dunks he'd be okay, but still nowhere near close to the all star he's considered, which is just from reputation, draft pick status, and people overvaluing the little things. Playmaking and offensive efficiency is still by FAR the most valuable skillset in the league, and he does none of that at close to even an above average level, to put it kindly.
I struggle to see how Simmons will ever be better than the 4th best player on a title team. I like Dame a lot and really hope they don't move CJ for him because CJ is worth his contract at the least. I think Simmons ends up on a rebuild job like Houston or OKC, who knows they have time to wait out the contract and see if he develops. Dude is right handed so maybe rebuild his entire shot shooting righty instead of lefty.
Also if it isn't clear from that above, if Draymond were ever to become available imo Phx should run the other way. We're good now because we have no weak shooters and 1 weak defender who barely plays.
bwgood77 wrote:spanishninja wrote:Jesus Christ man, does it seem like the other top big men in the playoffs are trying to duck Ayton? Gobert gone and now biid gone. There's still Gianni's I guess
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
He may have to guard Lopez which will really draw him out. I'd like him to guard Giannis but who could possibly guard Lopez? I certainly don't want to play two bigs.
Keith_myath wrote:bwgood77 wrote:spanishninja wrote:Jesus Christ man, does it seem like the other top big men in the playoffs are trying to duck Ayton? Gobert gone and now biid gone. There's still Gianni's I guess
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
He may have to guard Lopez which will really draw him out. I'd like him to guard Giannis but who could possibly guard Lopez? I certainly don't want to play two bigs.
Lulz.
If the Bucks want to try and beat us with Lopez tossing up 3's all game, then they must come into question for tanking. Works in our favour if we allow Lopez to chuck up bad 3's.
darealjuice wrote:Philly needed Simmons to be a superstar, but he's closer to Draymond Green than he is LeBron James. It's pretty obvious that they both need a change of scenery. Embiid was dominant with more shooting around him this year, I'd imagine they'll want to swap Simmons out for someone that can shoot and handle the ball more.
Simmons is so interesting because he's clearly very talented, but his work ethic must not be there considering he lazed his way through his year at LSU and hasn't added much to his game since coming into the league. His time has definitely run its course in Philly.
Happy for the Hawks. I've been a big fan of Trae Young, and they have the young talent to sustain winning for a bit. Nice to see a rebuild go well.
BobbieL wrote:darealjuice wrote:Philly needed Simmons to be a superstar, but he's closer to Draymond Green than he is LeBron James. It's pretty obvious that they both need a change of scenery. Embiid was dominant with more shooting around him this year, I'd imagine they'll want to swap Simmons out for someone that can shoot and handle the ball more.
Simmons is so interesting because he's clearly very talented, but his work ethic must not be there considering he lazed his way through his year at LSU and hasn't added much to his game since coming into the league. His time has definitely run its course in Philly.
Happy for the Hawks. I've been a big fan of Trae Young, and they have the young talent to sustain winning for a bit. Nice to see a rebuild go well.
Its why I mentioned McCAllum for Simmons. Portland probably is not going to be the same team . They have been the same team for a few years and they have a really good player who probably wants to win more. And McCallum seems like he would get value. Not sure if Simmons would be enough but it works straight up salary wise.
AtheJ415 wrote:Bogyo wrote:Simmons is signed through 2025, and will be making 40 mill that year. :O
His contract might be worse than Wall's.
darealjuice wrote:BobbieL wrote:darealjuice wrote:Philly needed Simmons to be a superstar, but he's closer to Draymond Green than he is LeBron James. It's pretty obvious that they both need a change of scenery. Embiid was dominant with more shooting around him this year, I'd imagine they'll want to swap Simmons out for someone that can shoot and handle the ball more.
Simmons is so interesting because he's clearly very talented, but his work ethic must not be there considering he lazed his way through his year at LSU and hasn't added much to his game since coming into the league. His time has definitely run its course in Philly.
Happy for the Hawks. I've been a big fan of Trae Young, and they have the young talent to sustain winning for a bit. Nice to see a rebuild go well.
Its why I mentioned McCAllum for Simmons. Portland probably is not going to be the same team . They have been the same team for a few years and they have a really good player who probably wants to win more. And McCallum seems like he would get value. Not sure if Simmons would be enough but it works straight up salary wise.
I can see the logic, I just don't know if that fills the point guard hole that the Sixers have by dumping Simmons. I'm not a big fan of pairing Lillard with Simmons either.
RunDogGun wrote:darealjuice wrote:BobbieL wrote:
Its why I mentioned McCAllum for Simmons. Portland probably is not going to be the same team . They have been the same team for a few years and they have a really good player who probably wants to win more. And McCallum seems like he would get value. Not sure if Simmons would be enough but it works straight up salary wise.
I can see the logic, I just don't know if that fills the point guard hole that the Sixers have by dumping Simmons. I'm not a big fan of pairing Lillard with Simmons either.
Have Simmons play sf and he can run the offense when Lillard sits.
RunDogGun wrote:I don't know, Portland still has Simons, who shot almost 43% from three, which was better than CJ. If Simmons can work on his shot, I think it could help Portland a lot. I don't see why Portland would move Lillard.
RunDogGun wrote:I don't know, Portland still has Simons, who shot almost 43% from three, which was better than CJ. If Simmons can work on his shot, I think it could help Portland a lot. I don't see why Portland would move Lillard.
darealjuice wrote:Philly needed Simmons to be a superstar, but he's closer to Draymond Green than he is LeBron James. It's pretty obvious that they both need a change of scenery. Embiid was dominant with more shooting around him this year, I'd imagine they'll want to swap Simmons out for someone that can shoot and handle the ball more.
Simmons is so interesting because he's clearly very talented, but his work ethic must not be there considering he lazed his way through his year at LSU and hasn't added much to his game since coming into the league. His time has definitely run its course in Philly.
Happy for the Hawks. I've been a big fan of Trae Young, and they have the young talent to sustain winning for a bit. Nice to see a rebuild go well.
Bogyo wrote:RunDogGun wrote:darealjuice wrote:
I can see the logic, I just don't know if that fills the point guard hole that the Sixers have by dumping Simmons. I'm not a big fan of pairing Lillard with Simmons either.
Have Simmons play sf and he can run the offense when Lillard sits.
I was also on this idea a while back, but the more I look at Simmons the less I see how the Blazers get better OVERALL with this trade.
They gain on playmaking a bit, and more on D - but they lose so much on scoring, shooting, spacing...
On the Sixers side - they only have Embiid as a superstar after this, CJ is just not one, however good he is.
I think if I were the Sixers I'd throw everything at the Blazers for Lillard, then round out the rest with whatever... The Blazers could get Simmons, Curry, Thybull and maybe 1-2 picks depending on protectinons and scheduling of those picks... Not sure if that's something the Blazers would do, as they are not going anywhere with that squad either - but they would have pieces to work from maybe, or if Lillard likes the idea and they do him a solid.
RunDogGun wrote:I don't know, Portland still has Simons, who shot almost 43% from three, which was better than CJ. If Simmons can work on his shot, I think it could help Portland a lot. I don't see why Portland would move Lillard.
lilfishi22 wrote:darealjuice wrote:Philly needed Simmons to be a superstar, but he's closer to Draymond Green than he is LeBron James. It's pretty obvious that they both need a change of scenery. Embiid was dominant with more shooting around him this year, I'd imagine they'll want to swap Simmons out for someone that can shoot and handle the ball more.
Simmons is so interesting because he's clearly very talented, but his work ethic must not be there considering he lazed his way through his year at LSU and hasn't added much to his game since coming into the league. His time has definitely run its course in Philly.
Happy for the Hawks. I've been a big fan of Trae Young, and they have the young talent to sustain winning for a bit. Nice to see a rebuild go well.
That's probably more disrespectful to Draymond than Simmons lol
Draymond at least shoots, is decent at the FT line and is a better defender than Simmons imo. Better team communicator, seems to care a heck of a lot more about winning and basically has never been overpaid.
darealjuice wrote:lilfishi22 wrote:darealjuice wrote:Philly needed Simmons to be a superstar, but he's closer to Draymond Green than he is LeBron James. It's pretty obvious that they both need a change of scenery. Embiid was dominant with more shooting around him this year, I'd imagine they'll want to swap Simmons out for someone that can shoot and handle the ball more.
Simmons is so interesting because he's clearly very talented, but his work ethic must not be there considering he lazed his way through his year at LSU and hasn't added much to his game since coming into the league. His time has definitely run its course in Philly.
Happy for the Hawks. I've been a big fan of Trae Young, and they have the young talent to sustain winning for a bit. Nice to see a rebuild go well.
That's probably more disrespectful to Draymond than Simmons lol
Draymond at least shoots, is decent at the FT line and is a better defender than Simmons imo. Better team communicator, seems to care a heck of a lot more about winning and basically has never been overpaid.
I just meant that he's more of a complementary "star" player than Superstar.
I don't think it's that disrespectful to Draymond though. Simmons has his obvious flaws, but he does things on the floor that Draymond can't too. You can't just give the ball to Draymond and expect him to create offense. His combination of size, athleticism, skill, and playmaking is just hard to come by. I agree that Draymond is the slightly better defender and that his intangibles are clearly better, but he's also been at/under 30% from 3 for the last 5 years and wasn't very impressive without Steph, KD, and Klay last year.
Simmons will show his value more with spacing, shooters, and a 5 that can play pick and roll/pop well. Simmons and Embiid don't have mutually beneficial play styles. Embiid's post-centric offense leaves a big in the paint when Simmons attacks, and Simmons being a non-shooter at his size allows a bigger defender to pretty much play free safety when he's off ball. I don't think he'll ever reach his potential, but I would be a bit concerned if Pop got his hands on him. He can basically be a poor man's Giannis with better shot selection lol.