ImageImageImageImageImage

Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer

Kenter16
Junior
Posts: 336
And1: 91
Joined: Aug 16, 2019
       

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#481 » by Kenter16 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 7:56 pm

mojo13 wrote:Alright so what do we have here? Something like:

Guards: Joseph/NAW/Trae Bell Haynes/ Mulder (Nembhard)

Wings: Barrett, Wiggins, Dort, Ejim (Doornekamp)

Bigs: Lyles, Powell, Nicholson, Bennett (Klassen)

Hopefully the final three don't matter much and Nurse is focused on the top 8 or 9.


Still the best talent in the tournament (by far) and the most talented group Canada has ever assembled? (only 2018 WC Summer Window Qualifier team could rival it).

Strength is obviously in the the Wings with Barrett, Wiggins, Dort and then the guards with CoJo, NAW, Mulder.



Agree with your final roster. I would cut the guys in brackets. There is a case to keep Klassen. He's a big body. Bennett is much better player overall though.

Dort will be a guard in this team, unless Nurse runs out 3 guards. There is no reason to play him on at wing when you have Wiggins, Barrett, Ejim and Bennett. He played at the 3 a lot in his rookie season because they wanted him out with Paul and Shai. This season he played there half the time and half the time at guard. I think a 3 guard rotation of NAW, CoJo and Dort makes a lot of sense.

This is a SOLID team. You have lot's of defense at 4 positions, like you said lacking a real post defender. Although, I think our post defense is adequate. Lot's of offense at every position. Guys who can create from 1-5. Lot's of options on the perimeter. This team won't have a problem spacing the floor.

I wonder if we will see lineups with Barrett and Wiggins on the floor at the same time. If you are Nurse you have to find a way to get your two best out there together often.
aminiaturebuddha
Head Coach
Posts: 6,833
And1: 7,442
Joined: Aug 07, 2006

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#482 » by aminiaturebuddha » Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:34 pm

The lack of solid post defenders (and rebounders) or reliable 3-point shooting are the two most obvious weaknesses for the team. But this is still a very good roster.

Defensively, Nick Nurse has proven that he can devise schemes to deal with opponents who work a lot in the post, so I'm not sure that will hurt us too much. If we go up against a player who seems to be dominating down there, Nurse will come up with hedges and doubles from all different directions to disrupt whatever the opposing team has going.

The biggest problem might be rebounding. As I suggested a few days ago, and mojo mentioned above, our wings are solid rebounders and will be able to help out, but that might handicap one of our biggest strengths, which will be the transition game.

The scoring should be there, but Nurse obviously runs a modern NBA-style offence - which means lots of 3-point attempts. A lot of our players are capable but streaky 3-point shooters. I just hope in a tournament like this, where one game is so important, that we can overcome the inevitable cold streaks.

All that said, I'm fairly pleased with this roster, all things considered. It would have looked much better with Olynyk and Birch, but there's still lots to work with - defence, playmaking, offensive skill.

As for mojo's question about leadership - I think CoJo will be the clear leader on the team. He's been there as a team leader before, plays a position that lends itself to leadership, and has been around long enough that he knows most of these guys. Sure, he's not the most talented player on the roster, but I have a feeling that most of the guys respect him. Anyone who has managed to carve out a 10-year career in the NBA should garner a certain amount of respect from his teammates, most of whom are just starting out on their basketball journeys. Someone like Barrett will be great as a secondary leader, especially since he's the only one who's previously led Canada to an international championship.
Kenter16
Junior
Posts: 336
And1: 91
Joined: Aug 16, 2019
       

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#483 » by Kenter16 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:05 pm

aminiaturebuddha wrote:The lack of solid post defenders (and rebounders) or reliable 3-point shooting are the two most obvious weaknesses for the team. But this is still a very good roster.


Our 3 point shooting is going to be our strength. Mulder, RJ, Wiggins, Lyles (2019 season) and CoJo (In Detriot) shot above league average from 3. All on fairy high volume. Nickeil is streaky, but he ended up just below league average this season. Dort is just below league average as well. TBH shot 36% from 3 in the BBL, not sure what league average is there. Not to mention Nicholson who has shot the lights out from 3 since joining the CBL (41, 46, 49 and 41%).
There won't be a team in Victoria who can shoot like us. Maybe Turkey, with Korkmaz, Ilyasova and Larkin.
TrueNorth31
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 358
Joined: Sep 04, 2018
     

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#484 » by TrueNorth31 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:13 pm

This will not make our Aussie friends happy ( or maybe some of them will be relieved )

Read on Twitter


Speaking of shooting remember the Fiba 3 point line is closer which should help our overall average ( if the shots are open given less spacing in the Fiba game ).
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,489
And1: 3,019
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#485 » by Mirotic12 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:22 pm

Kenter16 wrote:Our 3 point shooting is going to be our strength. Mulder, RJ, Wiggins, Lyles (2019 season) and CoJo (In Detriot) shot above league average from 3. All on fairy high volume. Nickeil is streaky, but he ended up just below league average this season. Dort is just below league average as well. TBH shot 36% from 3 in the BBL, not sure what league average is there. Not to mention Nicholson who has shot the lights out from 3 since joining the CBL (41, 46, 49 and 41%).
There won't be a team in Victoria who can shoot like us. Maybe Turkey, with Korkmaz, Ilyasova and Larkin.


Turkey's best shooter is Melih Mahmatoglou, he's a legit sniper. Larkin's not really that great of a shooter. On Efes, he played on a totally stacked team, and they ran screens and picks for him the whole game, and just let him shoot as much as he wanted. Against a set defense, he needs a switch or a screen, or he isn't much of a threat at all. He's also very streaky. He's a perfect example of why you can't just look at stats to determine how good players are at shooting. By the numbers, he looks like a great shooter, when in reality he's a streaky chucker, that needs plays run for him the whole game.

The main thing a defense has to worry about with Larkin is that he's one of those guys that is super streaky and can just all of a sudden get crazy hot and hit like 8-10 threes (if he has screens and picks). But if he's not on one of those hot shooting streaks, he's not that much of a shooting threat. For the most part, he needs open looks and he's not that good at getting his own shots off by himself, because he's too small. On Efes, he had tremendous screen setters as bigs (Sertac Sanli, Chris Singleton, Tibor Pliess, Bryant Dunston) that helped him get so many open looks. With Turkey's NT, he has Sanli also, but I'm not sure if the rest of their bigs are great screeners like all of Efes' bigs are.

As far as Korkmaz goes...he's a good shooter, but he's nothing to worry about all that much. He's as soft as they come, physically and mentally. He's never been able to handle intense play and physicality. Mahmatoglou and Ilyasova are definitely their two main shooting weapons.

TrueNorth31 wrote:Speaking of shooting remember the Fiba 3 point line is closer which should help our overall average ( if the shots are open given less spacing in the Fiba game ).


Yeah, the 3 point line being closer can actually make the long-range shots more difficult. FIBA has a true zone, unlike the NBA, and the court is also a little smaller. FIBA refs also allow a lot more physicality and the rules allow much more contact for the defender. What you see in a deep NBA playoff game, in terms of physicality, is what you see in any typical FIBA game with high quality teams.

So there is clearly less spacing and time for the shooters. So the 3 point line being closer actually makes it more difficult, if you are playing against quality teams, especially ones that have bigs that can cover on the perimeter. For example, there are a lot less open 3 point shots in the EuroLeague, than there are in the NBA. An NBA game is just full of open 3 point shots for teams, while they generally mainly happen in EuroLeague by the design of the defense, like leaving a player open on purpose.

If you want to get open shots, where the shooters have space and time, then you need to run a lot of high pick and roll and a lot of deep ball screens, and have ball handlers that are going to shoot from deep range, like 25+ feet. Shooters don't get a lot of easy open looks around the 3 point line against a good FIBA team, like it happens in the NBA.

So the shorter 3 point line won't necessarily help, just because it's closer. It depends on what kind of shooters you have, what kind of screeners you have, and how big, strong, and physical your guards are. Just look at 2019 Team USA - those NBA guards looked very normal as shooters under a FIBA setting.
TrueNorth31
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 358
Joined: Sep 04, 2018
     

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#486 » by TrueNorth31 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:08 pm

Thanks Mirotic that seems like solid analysis. One thing I would say if you have strong guys who can shoot with lots of range from the NBA line and further out, you can just initiate your offence higher to get more spacing ( sadly we don't have Jamal Murray who has almost Lillard/Curry like deep range ). It seems like there's more posting up bigs in the Fiba game - is this true or am I dreaming, and if so why ?

As well here's the latest Turkish roster.

http://www.fiba.basketball/oqt/canada/2020/team/Turkey#|tab=roster

If you have time I'd be interested on your scouting report.
mojo13
Veteran
Posts: 2,607
And1: 1,909
Joined: Mar 25, 2014
   

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#487 » by mojo13 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:27 pm

TrueNorth31 wrote:Thanks Mirotic that seems like solid analysis. One thing I would say if you have strong guys who can shoot with lots of range from the NBA line and further out, you can just initiate your offence higher to get more spacing ( sadly we don't have Jamal Murray who has almost Lillard/Curry like deep range ). It seems like there's more posting up bigs in the Fiba game - is this true or am I dreaming, and if so why ?

As well here's the latest Turkish roster.

http://www.fiba.basketball/oqt/canada/2020/team/Turkey#|tab=roster

If you have time I'd be interested on your scouting report.


It is probably becoming less this way, but I've thought that large, strong, slow footed bigs still have a place in FIBA where they are virtually extinct in the NBA game. FIBA allows zones, no defensive three in the key, moving screens are loosely called, more physicals contact allowed, the short three point line makes it easier for bigs to close out and recover. It is generally a less athletic, open and mobile game - its more physical, more tactical, slower, rougher, more thoughtful, more team oriented.

The NBA is a ballet showing off individual athletics and agility, compared to the rugby match than can be FIBA.
TrueNorth31
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 358
Joined: Sep 04, 2018
     

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#488 » by TrueNorth31 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:39 pm

mojo13 wrote:
TrueNorth31 wrote:Thanks Mirotic that seems like solid analysis. One thing I would say if you have strong guys who can shoot with lots of range from the NBA line and further out, you can just initiate your offence higher to get more spacing ( sadly we don't have Jamal Murray who has almost Lillard/Curry like deep range ). It seems like there's more posting up bigs in the Fiba game - is this true or am I dreaming, and if so why ?

As well here's the latest Turkish roster.

http://www.fiba.basketball/oqt/canada/2020/team/Turkey#|tab=roster

If you have time I'd be interested on your scouting report.


It is probably becoming less this way, but I've thought that large, strong, slow footed bigs still have a place in FIBA where they are virtually extinct in the NBA game. FIBA allows zones, no defensive three in the key, moving screens are loosely called, more physicals contact allowed, the short three point line makes it easier for bigs to close out and recover. It is generally a less athletic, open and mobile game - its more physical, more tactical, slower, rougher, more thoughtful, more team oriented.

The NBA is a ballet showing off individual athletics and agility, compared to the rugby match than can be FIBA.


I can see this athletic survivor bias theory ( very well put ) - you seem to be describing Nicholson to a tee ( maybe Lyles as well ). Slower guys who struggle a bit with the NBA switch mentality on high screens , but maybe can excel in the Fiba game with the true zone and have requisite strong post games ( not to mention both can pick and pop to ).
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,489
And1: 3,019
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#489 » by Mirotic12 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:57 pm

mojo13 wrote:It is probably becoming less this way, but I've thought that large, strong, slow footed bigs still have a place in FIBA where they are virtually extinct in the NBA game. FIBA allows zones, no defensive three in the key, moving screens are loosely called, more physicals contact allowed, the short three point line makes it easier for bigs to close out and recover. It is generally a less athletic, open and mobile game - its more physical, more tactical, slower, rougher, more thoughtful, more team oriented.

The NBA is a ballet showing off individual athletics and agility, compared to the rugby match than can be FIBA.


This is pretty much correct, except FIBA changed the screening rules some years back. Unless the refs ignore the rules and allow moving screens. But that is if the refs in a particular game are choosing to do that for whatever reason. FIBA made the rules where you can't move on a screen some years back. I can say that for example in EuroLeague, the refs are very strict on the screening rules, and they will call 3-4 fouls on screen setters, in straight offensive possessions if they have to, to send the message to players about it.

In general, FIBA basically tried to eliminate moving screens completely. So if they are happening in a game, that's just a reffing issue. Maybe the Americas refs would be more lenient and let Canada set moving screens, because the NBA is so much more lenient with it than FIBA is now.

FIBA wanted to ban moving screens and flopping several years back, and they basically did so with both. Which makes it really ridiculous that the NBA still has so much of both.

TrueNorth31 wrote:I can see this athletic survivor bias theory ( very well put ) - you seem to be describing Nicholson to a tee ( maybe Lyles as well ). Slower guys who struggle a bit with the NBA switch mentality on high screens , but maybe can excel in the Fiba game with the true zone and have requisite strong post games ( not to mention both can pick and pop to ).


There are a lot of bigs in FIBA teams that are capable in switches though. Mainly European and South American teams. The whole switching defense the NBA uses now, was a common thing to see back in the 70s and 80s in European basketball. Then it went out of vouge for some years, then around the mid 2000s it started to come back, and by the early 2010s some EuroLeague teams were switching on like every single play.

Zeljko Obradovic's EuroLeague teams for example, were playing this current NBA switch defense like 15 years ago. So some of these international teams might have bigs that are very adept at switching. Dusan Ivkovic, another EuroLeague coach, was actually using teams that switched everything on every play a long time ago. Well before the NBA became switch defense crazy.

It's just like how for example, the Mike D'antoni system of offense, was just how teams played in Italy back in the 70s and 80s. And there are still some teams and coaches now that might play that way. So the coaches of a team like Canada really have to know what kind of a coach they are playing against. Which is why it is good for Canada to have some coaches with European experience.
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,489
And1: 3,019
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#490 » by Mirotic12 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:55 am

TrueNorth31 wrote:As well here's the latest Turkish roster.

http://www.fiba.basketball/oqt/canada/2020/team/Turkey#|tab=roster

If you have time I'd be interested on your scouting report.


It's definitely a very good national team. They certainly have the ability to win the tournament.

I assume you know their current and former NBA players already (Larkin, Yurtseven, Osman, Korkmaz, Ilyasova).

Sehmus Hazer - he's a young two guard. He's probably one of Turkey's young NBA prospects. He's a fairly good player, but maybe too young to do a whole lot at such tournaments. He can score and he's a pretty good athlete. Personally, I like him more than Korkmaz.

Goksenin Koksal - he's a big, strong, physical guard. Decent ball handler. Good rebounder for a guard and a pretty good defender. He doesn't offer a whole lot on offense, but he can get to the rim and score. A decent role player for them. Probably one of their better role players actually.

Melih Mahmutoglu - he's a pure shooter with deep range, and he can hit shots from all areas of the court. He's very dangerous if the defense lets him get open looks running off screens. He's also a very experienced player. Other than his shooting ability, he doesn't offer a team that much on offense. But he can definitely score in bunches if you let him get open looks from screens. He's like a poor man's Juan Carlos Navarro.

Sertac Sanli - He's a very big body. He's also a quite good center. He's one of the better centers in the EuroLeague at the moment. He's a much different kind of center than Sengun. He's not an all around and very high skilled kind of guy on offense like Sengun. But he's very good at what he does. He's a big strong center that will finish well around the paint area, off feeds from guards. He's a good rebounder and he's physical on offense and defense. He's great at setting screens and playing pick and roll as a big. He's also good at pick and pop from mid range.

Alperen Sengun - He's very young for a tournament like this. I think he just turned 19, or does so in a few days. Despite his age, he's very skilled for a big and especially so for one his age. He's just one of those natural basketball players. I don't know how much he can realistically do for their national team right now, considering his age and that he's only played in mediocre teams and leagues in Europe. But his basketball game is extremely well developed for a big his age.

Bugrahan Tuncer - He's a big physical guard that can play at one or two. He's an Efes player in EuroLeague, but he doesn't play much on that team. From the little I've seen of him play, he seems like a fairly decent point guard / two guard. Pretty good offense skills, solid athleticism, physical on defense. He's actually one of the best guards in the Turkish League, he just doesn't get much playing time, since his team is so deep.

Dogus Özdemiroglu - He's a tough and physical guard that can play one or two. He's pesky on defense and fairly high energy. He was seen as a big prospect as a youth, but he has kind of been a bust. Up until this season, he didn't score much at senior levels. But then this season he finally started to have some big offensive games. So maybe he's finally starting to develop into a player, from being a talent.

Metecan Birsen - He's a big strong 3/4. He was considered a big talent as a youth player. He's pretty much been a bust though so far. But he was a decent player in FIBA Champions League this season.

Samet Geyik - He's a stretch four. He's probably like 6-9 to 6-10 and seems to have pretty good length also. He was considered a big talent as a youth. He's pretty much been a total bust though. For the most part, he doesn't do much for his teams. But occasionally he does flash some talent. I've seen him have a few big games here and there. He's talented, he's just never developed into what he could be.

Berk Ugurlu - Would be fine for them probably in a role like as a 5th guard. Was considered a big talent at youth levels. So far, he ended up being a bust. He's a big point guard, and he's a decent player in FIBA Champions League.

If they base the team around Larkin on offense, which media seems to indicate they will, it's not the same level team he's used to. Efes is clearly a better team. For example, in Efes he had Micic playing at two guard to help him, and he's much better of an offensive player than guys like Korkmaz or Osman. So that style of play might not be as effective, against some of the better national teams, when Larkin doesn't have such a guard like Micic playing next to him.

All in all, it's a pretty damn good national team though.
megalison
Freshman
Posts: 91
And1: 71
Joined: Feb 19, 2020
         

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#491 » by megalison » Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:10 am

Very solid roster. Given how diluted our past rosters were, I'd say the announcement is a huge win for the program.

Moreso than a paint presence, I'd worry more about playmaking. Last thing you want are a ton of ISO sets for Wiggins when ball movement stagnates. CoJo and RJ will need to do a lot of heavy lifting when it comes to shot creation.
TrueNorth31
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 358
Joined: Sep 04, 2018
     

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#492 » by TrueNorth31 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:18 am

Thanks Mirotic great stuff.
Kenter16
Junior
Posts: 336
And1: 91
Joined: Aug 16, 2019
       

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#493 » by Kenter16 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 5:09 am

Read on Twitter
?s=19


Well, looks like we know what TT is up to! Hahaha


Sent from my SM-G973W using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Jstock12
RealGM
Posts: 11,021
And1: 17,826
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
 

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#494 » by Jstock12 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:53 pm

OK, Greece has just become significantly stronger - Spanoulis decided not to play.
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,489
And1: 3,019
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#495 » by Mirotic12 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:25 pm

Jstock12 wrote:OK, Greece has just become significantly stronger - Spanoulis decided not to play.


Remember to use the green font next time.

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Jstock12
RealGM
Posts: 11,021
And1: 17,826
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
 

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#496 » by Jstock12 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:34 pm

Mirotic12 wrote:
Jstock12 wrote:OK, Greece has just become significantly stronger - Spanoulis decided not to play.


Remember to use the green font next time.

Read on Twitter


Problem is that Pitino would have structured the entire team around Spanoulis. I don't buy that Spanoulis is still good enough to be the main option. That's why I think this is a blessing in disguise for Greece. Addition by subtraction.
Mirotic12
Head Coach
Posts: 6,489
And1: 3,019
Joined: Jun 29, 2014

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#497 » by Mirotic12 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:52 pm

Jstock12 wrote:Problem is that Pitino would have structured the entire team around Spanoulis. I don't buy that Spanoulis is still good enough to be the main option. That's why I think this is a blessing in disguise for Greece. Addition by subtraction.


As I said earlier in this thread, this last season he was too soon back from his foot surgery, which was major. The recovery time is supposed to be 18-24 months, and he came back to play this season after just 8 months. So the doctors had him on limitations, in how much he could play, how much stress he could put on his foot, etc.

So he was purposely limited in his role by Olympiacos. It wasn't that he couldn't do it, it was for injury precautions. In a 3 game tournament, and at 16 months past his surgery, there would have been no reason to worry about limiting him. Over three games, he could have gone 100% and been fine. And if he plays to his full effort level, he can still lead a team.

He's still a much more dangerous scorer than anyone on Greece's team. That plus his experience is a huge loss for Greece. Honestly, it's much bigger than the loss of someone like Ioannis Papapetrou was, and he's considered like a top 5 small forward in Europe.

Sloukas is horribly bad on defense. He's a good shooter and scorer, great ball handler, good passer. But he's not able to run a team properly and he's not a real point guard. Calathes, while he has some very good points, like he's a great ball handler, great passer, has great court vision, he's a very good defender and also a very good rebounder for a guard, versatile on defense...he's a horribly bad shooter, and his team is always playing 4 on 5 in the half court and the other team's usually just leave him open and dare him to shoot. Guys like Rubio and Rondo are much better shooters than he is.

Neither of Calathes or Sloukas is a complete all around skilled guard like Spanoulis is. They will probably replace Spanoulis with some guys like Dimitris Katsivelis / Michalis Lountzis. Those guys are certainly talented players. They are big guards and they are quite athletic and good on defense. But they are miles away from Spanoulis' level on offense and his scoring ability.

Sloukas is probably Greece's best scorer now. So if Greece is built around him on offense, it's a big drop from Spanoulis. Panathianikos tried for years to build their offense around Calathes in EuroLeague, and they lost like 8 straight playoffs, because he can't shoot. Olympiacos this season tried to base their offense around Sloukas, and it was a huge failure. He was good before with Olympiacos and on Fenerbache, where he was like a 4th option. Olympiacos tried to run the offense through him and he was clearly not up to it, and they didn't make the playoffs.

This is Spanoulis this season in EuroLeague, playing in limited minutes. He can still take over a game against high level competition if he needs to.



The fact is Greece doesn't have anyone on it's roster now that is anywhere near to that level of scoring and shooting ability. Sloukas is maybe the closest one, and he's like half as talented of a scorer as Spanoulis is, if not less. Greece doesn't have any players now that can just take over a game completely by themselves and the defense can't make any adjustments of any kind to stop it. Spanoulis was the only guy Greece had like that. None of the other players even approach that level of offense.

Losing Spanoulis is the biggest blow for Greece yet, along with Giannis not being able to play. If Greece qualifies now by eliminating Canada, with like 8 of their 10 best players missing, including probably their 4 best players overall missing (Papapetrou, Printezis, Spanoulis, Giannis), then in all honesty, Canada's national team should be ashamed and embarrassed.
Kenter16
Junior
Posts: 336
And1: 91
Joined: Aug 16, 2019
       

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#498 » by Kenter16 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:44 pm

Jstock12 wrote:
Mirotic12 wrote:
Jstock12 wrote:OK, Greece has just become significantly stronger - Spanoulis decided not to play.


Remember to use the green font next time.

Read on Twitter


Problem is that Pitino would have structured the entire team around Spanoulis. I don't buy that Spanoulis is still good enough to be the main option. That's why I think this is a blessing in disguise for Greece. Addition by subtraction.


I think you are probably right. His best days are way behind him. But, Rick Pitino didn't think so and he has forgotten more about basketball than I will ever know. And it sounds like he is devastated that Spanoulis is out. I count this as a big loss for Greece.
aminiaturebuddha
Head Coach
Posts: 6,833
And1: 7,442
Joined: Aug 07, 2006

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#499 » by aminiaturebuddha » Tue Jun 22, 2021 4:42 pm

Kenter16 wrote:
aminiaturebuddha wrote:The lack of solid post defenders (and rebounders) or reliable 3-point shooting are the two most obvious weaknesses for the team. But this is still a very good roster.


Our 3 point shooting is going to be our strength. Mulder, RJ, Wiggins, Lyles (2019 season) and CoJo (In Detriot) shot above league average from 3. All on fairy high volume. Nickeil is streaky, but he ended up just below league average this season. Dort is just below league average as well. TBH shot 36% from 3 in the BBL, not sure what league average is there. Not to mention Nicholson who has shot the lights out from 3 since joining the CBL (41, 46, 49 and 41%).
There won't be a team in Victoria who can shoot like us. Maybe Turkey, with Korkmaz, Ilyasova and Larkin.


I hope you're right, but despite their averages over a full season of play, some of those guys are still too inconsistent for me. RJ and Wiggins are still prone to having 1-7 or 1-8 3-point shooting games too often, and they'll probably be our main scorers. Overall, shooting shouldn't be a problem, but in a tournament where one game can make the difference between qualifying or not, I worry about those guys having a game where they combine to go 3-17 or something like that and shoot us out of the game because they don't feel confident giving the shots to anyone else.

I obviously hope something like that doesn't happen, but I'm not sure that we can confidently say that 3-point shooting will be the strength of the team. Even without Brooks and a reliable post defender, I still think defence is actually going to be the team's strength. Nurse will be able to run out switchable lineups with long defenders at most positions throughout the game. I just hope the limited time that the players have together will allow them to implement those defensive schemes without too many breakdowns.
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 28,949
And1: 13,353
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A pig in a cage on antibiotics
     

Re: Team Canada Basketball Thread V3.0 

Post#500 » by SharoneWright » Tue Jun 22, 2021 4:47 pm

Mirotic12 wrote:
Read on Twitter

Pitino is hole hearted.
Is anybody here a marine biologist?

Return to Toronto Raptors