TheSuzerain wrote:TheStig wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:it's not going to happen. The max contract is important to the union to keep all its members well fed.
But Mitchell and Gobert won't get Bron/Davis money. They'll get what they make but Bron will have to pass on some team giving him 90% of the cap. Right now he might give up a couple mill. Will he give up 50 mill a year?
I'm saying the union says no. LeBron doesn't enter the picture.
Of course they say no. I don't want to sound like a tycoon cowboy, but the player union ruined the NBA. Obviously the owners were selfish and slow to concede profits to players. But together their combined CBA resolutions over the the past 25 years moved the league to the crappy place it is today. It is over-regulated with loopholes. Meaning the super teams have even greater advantages if they manage to assemble a super team (and clearly the superstars cracked the code). They should've all agreed to a generous hard cap earlier on, which moves up as a percentage of league profits.
Now the league is going to look to things like mid-season tournaments to build interest on top of a flawed foundation. Which is fine by me, cause any sort of novelty (even the rather silly over-thought play-in) seems to make things more interesting.
But in the end it still comes back to 10 perennially crappy teams, 10 teams who are closer to tread-milling than breaking forward, and the rest are a range of contenders amongst your 2 or 3 super contenders. Meaning at least half of the league is simply not worth caring about. So why all the rules for parity if there really isn't any parity?
The mediocre players of the NBA are paid more handsomely than any other sports' (completely) mediocre players. Fans just get jipped in the end. The NBA standards for on-court performance have dropped below even having to play the game. But hey, good for Felicio and Otto.