NotMyKawhi wrote:Phezmo123 wrote:RaptorReloaded wrote:
I see him as being amazing for our system and a huge contributor to successful regular seasons. But when we're in the playoffs first/second round we are going to run into the same problem we've had before and after Kawhi of not having a closer. I'd rather take the risk on Kuminga. He could be a huge misfire. But this kid is not Bruno.
To me, Suggs is a retooling move and Kuminga is a rebuilding move. If we choose Kuminga, then we should look to move Siakam/FVV since they’re now entering the prime.
Kuminga put up better numbers against better competition playing on a team w better players. He also is already physically built and can handle contact.
I think Kuminga puts up way better numbers on both ends of the floor than Suggs right from jump. Especially if a crap team like the magic take him?
He will average close to 20 and fill all the other stats imo
Now that I think about it, Masai's philosophy has always been to develop players while winning. I suppose we could continue winning with FVV/Siakam (in their prime) while developing OG/Kuminga/Malachi (several years from their prime).