Alperen Şengün

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

God Squad
RealGM
Posts: 13,366
And1: 11,619
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#701 » by God Squad » Fri Jul 2, 2021 9:44 am

Charm wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
Charm wrote:
Your slippery and unquantifiable definition of "length" is totally useless here. If Sengun's supposed lack of length doesn't affect his ability to finish above the rim, rebound, and block shots, then how does it even matter?


Most rim protection is done with the defender on the ground or jumping from a standstill not the same thing as loading up for a dunk. Standing reach is what really matters near the basket.


...so his blocks don't count if he had to jump? You're not making any sense here.

Virtually everyone recognizes that he's much more effective defensively around the basket than he is on the perimeter. Virtually everyone recognizes that he's better at defending bigger, slower players rather than smaller, quicker players. Reasonable minds can disagree on exactly how good he is defensively in the paint, or how bad he is defensively on the perimeter, but it's clear that the more he's in the paint, the more he's in position to succeed on that end of the court. Why anyone would intentionally try to make him a PF, which at the NBA level means a lot of switching and chasing shooters around the 3-point line, is beyond me.

You're either too invested into Sengun and not reading/understanding correctly. EvanZ trying to say most Centers don't get a running start when defending the paint or blocking shots. It's all, or mostly jumping/standing straight up. So I can see why standing reach is important. I also have concerns with him defending the PnR as his perimeter defense looks shaky. I still think he's a 6-12 range guy with a high ceiling. I just think all the defensive concerns are valid and his fans are glossing over it. But his detractors are ignoring all or most of the things he does at an elite level.
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,838
And1: 5,512
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#702 » by Yallbecrazy » Fri Jul 2, 2021 11:54 am

Dat2U wrote:
nolang1 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Not a huge fan of Cs that have to play drop coverage on the pick & roll. You can get away with it in the regular season but it the playoffs, a Cs lack of mobility will get exposed.


Of course this begs the obvious question of whether you'd consider Nikola Jokic an undraftable player for this reason or whether there might be some value in drafting a player in the mid/late lottery who would have a huge impact in the regular season.


How many Nikola Jokic's out there? How many Cs in the league are that skilled? Please don't try to suggest Sengun has this type of skill. And will you address Jokic's defense in playoffs?



Sengun is more skilled than Jokic was at the same age, albeit not quite the passer Jokic was.
Charm
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 257
Joined: May 13, 2021

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#703 » by Charm » Fri Jul 2, 2021 12:24 pm

God Squad wrote:
Charm wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
Most rim protection is done with the defender on the ground or jumping from a standstill not the same thing as loading up for a dunk. Standing reach is what really matters near the basket.


...so his blocks don't count if he had to jump? You're not making any sense here.

Virtually everyone recognizes that he's much more effective defensively around the basket than he is on the perimeter. Virtually everyone recognizes that he's better at defending bigger, slower players rather than smaller, quicker players. Reasonable minds can disagree on exactly how good he is defensively in the paint, or how bad he is defensively on the perimeter, but it's clear that the more he's in the paint, the more he's in position to succeed on that end of the court. Why anyone would intentionally try to make him a PF, which at the NBA level means a lot of switching and chasing shooters around the 3-point line, is beyond me.

You're either too invested into Sengun and not reading/understanding correctly. EvanZ trying to say most Centers don't get a running start when defending the paint or blocking shots. It's all, or mostly jumping/standing straight up. So I can see why standing reach is important. I also have concerns with him defending the PnR as his perimeter defense looks shaky. I still think he's a 6-12 range guy with a high ceiling. I just think all the defensive concerns are valid and his fans are glossing over it. But his detractors are ignoring all or most of the things he does at an elite level.


I mean, I'll meet you half way. Some of the defensive concerns are valid. This is possibly the first time I've heard the argument that a big's shot blocking won't translate because he's using too much athleticism to get his blocks. There are loads of 7' centers in Turkey, and Sengun blocked more shots than every single one of them, but because his standing reach is (hypothetically!) subpar, I'm supposed to believe this is a mirage?

The concerns about his perimeter defense? Sure, I'm happy to admit that that's a weakness for him at the moment. But suggesting that he's going to be so bad defensively in the paint that he can't even play center is crazy. I don't think any center prospect who was a similarly prolific rebounder/shot blocker faced questions about whether he'd be able to play the position at the next level, especially in recent years when sub-7' centers have become commonplace.
Curtis Lemansky
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 5,292
And1: 263
Joined: Feb 12, 2005

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#704 » by Curtis Lemansky » Fri Jul 2, 2021 12:48 pm

God Squad wrote:
Charm wrote:
EvanZ wrote:
Most rim protection is done with the defender on the ground or jumping from a standstill not the same thing as loading up for a dunk. Standing reach is what really matters near the basket.


...so his blocks don't count if he had to jump? You're not making any sense here.

Virtually everyone recognizes that he's much more effective defensively around the basket than he is on the perimeter. Virtually everyone recognizes that he's better at defending bigger, slower players rather than smaller, quicker players. Reasonable minds can disagree on exactly how good he is defensively in the paint, or how bad he is defensively on the perimeter, but it's clear that the more he's in the paint, the more he's in position to succeed on that end of the court. Why anyone would intentionally try to make him a PF, which at the NBA level means a lot of switching and chasing shooters around the 3-point line, is beyond me.

You're either too invested into Sengun and not reading/understanding correctly. EvanZ trying to say most Centers don't get a running start when defending the paint or blocking shots. It's all, or mostly jumping/standing straight up. So I can see why standing reach is important. I also have concerns with him defending the PnR as his perimeter defense looks shaky. I still think he's a 6-12 range guy with a high ceiling. I just think all the defensive concerns are valid and his fans are glossing over it. But his detractors are ignoring all or most of the things he does at an elite level.


Defensive concerns are valid but those concerns should be more about his lateral quickness than his rim protection is what we are saying. Whatever his standing reach/athleticism is, he led the league in total blocks and was second in blocks per game as an 18 year old. That has gotta count for something.. Chalk it up to his anticipation, reach, athleticism, or whatever you chose, he is clearly doing something right to block those shots. Whatever you are saying about defending in the paint and blocking without getting a running start is also true for the Turkish Basketball League he played in. Blocking shots require more than just length/athleticism, you need to have timing/anticipation as well. Throwing out Blake Griffin's name is useless because he wasn't even a good shot blocker in college (1.2 bpg in 33 mpg at his best college season). He clearly lacked the defensive awareness to block shots at a decent rate in college and in NBA.

Alperen lacks some length and might be only decent athletically, however his anticipation and timing seem to be off the charts (also can be evidenced by his unusually high steal rate). I mean PJ Washington is averaging 1.2 bpg in 30 mpg and he is neither long (8' 11'' standing reach) nor a big-time athlete. (and played 46% of his minutes at center last season btw)
"I don't step aside, I step up." - Vic Mackey
"My name is my name" - Marlo Stanfield
"If you come at the king, you best not miss" - Omar Little

Formerly known as nostradamus2005
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 4,184
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#705 » by EvanZ » Fri Jul 2, 2021 1:08 pm

Sengun averaged 1.6 blk in 28 minutes in Turkey. Kevin Love averaged 1.4 blk in 30 mpg at UCLA. Anthony Davis averaged 4.7 blk in 32 mpg his Freshman season at Kentucky.

I think people should focus way more on Sengun's assists and free throw %. Those are much more special than his STOCKs.
kobyz
Rookie
Posts: 1,122
And1: 308
Joined: Oct 31, 2006

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#706 » by kobyz » Fri Jul 2, 2021 2:18 pm

a smaller Karl-Anthony Towns
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#707 » by nolang1 » Fri Jul 2, 2021 2:31 pm

Dat2U wrote:
nolang1 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:Not a huge fan of Cs that have to play drop coverage on the pick & roll. You can get away with it in the regular season but it the playoffs, a Cs lack of mobility will get exposed.


Of course this begs the obvious question of whether you'd consider Nikola Jokic an undraftable player for this reason or whether there might be some value in drafting a player in the mid/late lottery who would have a huge impact in the regular season.


How many Nikola Jokic's out there? How many Cs in the league are that skilled? Please don't try to suggest Sengun has this type of skill. And will you address Jokic's defense in playoffs?


It's a good sign you made an extremely stupid point that you're immediately backpedaling to this. I was already granting your dumb argument that Nikola Jokic is worthless in the playoffs because of his defense (lol) to say that at some point in the draft getting a player who could at least be good in the regular season is better than getting a player who isn't good at all.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,171
And1: 7,947
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#708 » by Dat2U » Fri Jul 2, 2021 2:57 pm

nolang1 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
nolang1 wrote:
Of course this begs the obvious question of whether you'd consider Nikola Jokic an undraftable player for this reason or whether there might be some value in drafting a player in the mid/late lottery who would have a huge impact in the regular season.


How many Nikola Jokic's out there? How many Cs in the league are that skilled? Please don't try to suggest Sengun has this type of skill. And will you address Jokic's defense in playoffs?


It's a good sign you made an extremely stupid point that you're immediately backpedaling to this. I was already granting your dumb argument that Nikola Jokic is worthless in the playoffs because of his defense (lol) to say that at some point in the draft getting a player who could at least be good in the regular season is better than getting a player who isn't good at all.


Do not put words in my mouth. I never said Jokic was worthless in the playoffs, but his impact is muted somewhat by his defensive shortcomings. Your the one comparing an 18 yr old against far inferior comp to one of the greatest offensive bigs of all time. Calm down son! Sengun has nothing approaching that level of skill so its laughable you bought up Jokic in the first place.

Only reason you bought up Jokic is because you couldn't make an argument for Sengun.
User avatar
D J C
Pro Prospect
Posts: 795
And1: 521
Joined: Feb 27, 2007

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#709 » by D J C » Fri Jul 2, 2021 2:58 pm

EvanZ wrote:Sengun averaged 1.6 blk in 28 minutes in Turkey. Kevin Love averaged 1.4 blk in 30 mpg at UCLA. Anthony Davis averaged 4.7 blk in 32 mpg his Freshman season at Kentucky.

I think people should focus way more on Sengun's assists and free throw %. Those are much more special than his STOCKs.


Ayton averaged 3 STOCKs per 40.. Sabonis 1.9 per 40.. Vucevic 2.2 per 40.. Bam 2.9 per 40.. Jarrett Allen 2.6 per 40.. Capela 3.9 per 36.. Marc Gasol 3.4 per 36

Sengun averaged 3.8 STOCKs per 36

I think it is important to bring up when people are still trying to compare him to Tyler f'ing Hansbrough. We know he wont be a Capela or Ayton type of defender, but the numbers do stack up well and show promise to his defensive awareness and ability.
Curtis Lemansky
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 5,292
And1: 263
Joined: Feb 12, 2005

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#710 » by Curtis Lemansky » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:01 pm

EvanZ wrote:Sengun averaged 1.6 blk in 28 minutes in Turkey. Kevin Love averaged 1.4 blk in 30 mpg at UCLA. Anthony Davis averaged 4.7 blk in 32 mpg his Freshman season at Kentucky.

I think people should focus way more on Sengun's assists and free throw %. Those are much more special than his STOCKs.


1.4 bpg is pretty pedestrian in NCAA as a shot-blocker, 1.6 bpg in TBL is not. One of them was like the 100th best shot blocker in college, the other one was the 2nd best shot-blocker in a professional league playing against grown men, most of whom were stars in college.

I think people should focus more on lateral quickness than rim protection if they are concerned about the defensive side. You can partially solve the rim protection problem (if even there is one) by playing a rim protector next to him. Lateral quickness, you cannot solve or hide especially in playoffs. Good teams hunt you down mercilessly on pick&rolls and play you off the floor.
"I don't step aside, I step up." - Vic Mackey
"My name is my name" - Marlo Stanfield
"If you come at the king, you best not miss" - Omar Little

Formerly known as nostradamus2005
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 4,184
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#711 » by EvanZ » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:16 pm

Curtis Lemansky wrote:Good teams hunt you down mercilessly on pick&rolls and play you off the floor.


Whether Sengun is a 4 or a 5 this will be the case.
Charm
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 257
Joined: May 13, 2021

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#712 » by Charm » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:16 pm

Anecdotal, but worth noting that a 19-year-old Ayton got run off the floor by Buffalo in the first round of the NCAA playoffs. His defensive fundamentals at the time were almost nonexistent on the perimeter. A few years later he's a 40mpg starter going into the NBA finals.
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#713 » by nolang1 » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:25 pm

Dat2U wrote:
nolang1 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
How many Nikola Jokic's out there? How many Cs in the league are that skilled? Please don't try to suggest Sengun has this type of skill. And will you address Jokic's defense in playoffs?


It's a good sign you made an extremely stupid point that you're immediately backpedaling to this. I was already granting your dumb argument that Nikola Jokic is worthless in the playoffs because of his defense (lol) to say that at some point in the draft getting a player who could at least be good in the regular season is better than getting a player who isn't good at all.


Do not put words in my mouth. I never said Jokic was worthless in the playoffs, but his impact is muted somewhat by his defensive shortcomings. Your the one comparing an 18 yr old against far inferior comp to one of the greatest offensive bigs of all time. Calm down son! Sengun has nothing approaching that level of skill so its laughable you bought up Jokic in the first place.

Only reason you bought up Jokic is because you couldn't make an argument for Sengun.


Not gonna continue arguing with someone who can't pass the your/you're test. Just look up Jokic's stats from age 18 (he wasn't playing in the NBA then either) and you'll see it is indeed comparable at the same point where Jokic shot more threes and had a slightly higher assist rate but Sengun has the edge everywhere else.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 4,184
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#714 » by EvanZ » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:26 pm

Charm wrote:Anecdotal, but worth noting that a 19-year-old Ayton got run off the floor by Buffalo in the first round of the NCAA playoffs. His defensive fundamentals at the time were almost nonexistent on the perimeter. A few years later he's a 40mpg starter going into the NBA finals.


Yes, I see this same argument now for why Wiseman is going to be DPOY someday.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 4,184
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#715 » by EvanZ » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:27 pm

D J C wrote:
EvanZ wrote:Sengun averaged 1.6 blk in 28 minutes in Turkey. Kevin Love averaged 1.4 blk in 30 mpg at UCLA. Anthony Davis averaged 4.7 blk in 32 mpg his Freshman season at Kentucky.

I think people should focus way more on Sengun's assists and free throw %. Those are much more special than his STOCKs.


Ayton averaged 3 STOCKs per 40.. Sabonis 1.9 per 40.. Vucevic 2.2 per 40.. Bam 2.9 per 40.. Jarrett Allen 2.6 per 40.. Capela 3.9 per 36.. Marc Gasol 3.4 per 36

Sengun averaged 3.8 STOCKs per 36



I have him ranked higher than all those guys coming out. But I don't have him higher than an Anthony Davis, which is what it sounds like some folks in here want to do.

Charm literally has him #1 on his board.
Charm
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 257
Joined: May 13, 2021

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#716 » by Charm » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:44 pm

EvanZ wrote:
D J C wrote:
EvanZ wrote:Sengun averaged 1.6 blk in 28 minutes in Turkey. Kevin Love averaged 1.4 blk in 30 mpg at UCLA. Anthony Davis averaged 4.7 blk in 32 mpg his Freshman season at Kentucky.

I think people should focus way more on Sengun's assists and free throw %. Those are much more special than his STOCKs.


Ayton averaged 3 STOCKs per 40.. Sabonis 1.9 per 40.. Vucevic 2.2 per 40.. Bam 2.9 per 40.. Jarrett Allen 2.6 per 40.. Capela 3.9 per 36.. Marc Gasol 3.4 per 36

Sengun averaged 3.8 STOCKs per 36



I have him ranked higher than all those guys coming out. But I don't have him higher than an Anthony Davis, which is what it sounds like some folks in here want to do.

Charm literally has him #1 on his board.


Don’t know why he has to be a better prospect than AD to be #1 in this draft. AD would be the #1 pick by a country mile this year.
Brick Layer
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 116
Joined: Jul 01, 2021

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#717 » by Brick Layer » Fri Jul 2, 2021 3:49 pm

EvanZ wrote:
D J C wrote:
EvanZ wrote:Sengun averaged 1.6 blk in 28 minutes in Turkey. Kevin Love averaged 1.4 blk in 30 mpg at UCLA. Anthony Davis averaged 4.7 blk in 32 mpg his Freshman season at Kentucky.

I think people should focus way more on Sengun's assists and free throw %. Those are much more special than his STOCKs.


Ayton averaged 3 STOCKs per 40.. Sabonis 1.9 per 40.. Vucevic 2.2 per 40.. Bam 2.9 per 40.. Jarrett Allen 2.6 per 40.. Capela 3.9 per 36.. Marc Gasol 3.4 per 36

Sengun averaged 3.8 STOCKs per 36



I have him ranked higher than all those guys coming out. But I don't have him higher than an Anthony Davis, which is what it sounds like some folks in here want to do.

Charm literally has him #1 on his board.

Charm sounds and acts like he is related to Alperen Sengun or he is his agent.
Charm
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 257
Joined: May 13, 2021

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#718 » by Charm » Fri Jul 2, 2021 4:06 pm

I'm just a numbers guy...Sengun probably has a bigger gulf between his statistical production (for an 18-year-old) and his consensus draft position than any previous prospect I've scouted. So I made an account on here to see what people are saying.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,171
And1: 7,947
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#719 » by Dat2U » Fri Jul 2, 2021 6:04 pm

nolang1 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
nolang1 wrote:
It's a good sign you made an extremely stupid point that you're immediately backpedaling to this. I was already granting your dumb argument that Nikola Jokic is worthless in the playoffs because of his defense (lol) to say that at some point in the draft getting a player who could at least be good in the regular season is better than getting a player who isn't good at all.


Do not put words in my mouth. I never said Jokic was worthless in the playoffs, but his impact is muted somewhat by his defensive shortcomings. Your the one comparing an 18 yr old against far inferior comp to one of the greatest offensive bigs of all time. Calm down son! Sengun has nothing approaching that level of skill so its laughable you bought up Jokic in the first place.

Only reason you bought up Jokic is because you couldn't make an argument for Sengun.


Not gonna continue arguing with someone who can't pass the your/you're test. Just look up Jokic's stats from age 18 (he wasn't playing in the NBA then either) and you'll see it is indeed comparable at the same point where Jokic shot more threes and had a slightly higher assist rate but Sengun has the edge everywhere else.


So you assume every prospect has similar development curve as Jokic?

I'm naturally impressed when a kid that young is incredibly productive but where does an undersized low post C that can't defend the perimeter fit in today's game? I don’t doubt the great hands, radar like tracking on the boards and touch around the rim but the C position has an outsized impact on the defensive end so what a C can do on that end means alot.
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Alperen Şengün 

Post#720 » by Stillwater » Fri Jul 2, 2021 6:11 pm

baldur wrote:
Stillwater wrote:Still seems to be getting slept on. I wonder if it will be reflected in the actual draft. I think he is clearly a lottery level prospect not sure he goes there though if the general consensus is even close


it is certain he will be drafted in the lottery.

A follower of INTL the prospects I assume you are...most are maybe not as much since the consensus is counter to this opinion. I agree as I stated he is a lottery level prospect but so was Poku in a weaker draft and still was not taken in the top 14. I think a lot of these orgs aare so busy patting the backs of their connections in USA circles they rarely take the risk on intl prospects unless they are insane cant miss ones.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING

Return to NBA Draft