WindyCityBorn wrote:Sportfan73 wrote:Something just tells me it’s Lavine
Nope.
Yes, not Adam Lavine
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan
WindyCityBorn wrote:Sportfan73 wrote:Something just tells me it’s Lavine
Nope.
bake51 wrote:76ciology wrote:bake51 wrote:
And that's fine but what if it goes the other way and Simmons is traded for .50 cents on the dollar?
We got Morey.
You’re team will likely give up Edwards. Because your team is at the bottom of the food chain that teams on top likes to prey for your talents. Another thing is your team will do whatever it takes to just make the playoffs. Specially after the success of the Suns.
Darryl Morey has lost trades before too. Don't forget that.
I'm willing to bet that Edwards is not on the table especially for Simmons. Who are the wolves bidding against? The kings? They're not giving up Fox. Maybe you guys can get Lavine which would be a good fit or McCollum but I don't see any team giving up the asset that you think. Atleast not this offseason. I think his value increases if he stays with the Sixers one more year.
76ciology wrote:Raps top 5 pick? Pass.
Suggs isn’t gonna solve our problem.
I’ll ship it to a third team instead
76ciology wrote:bake51 wrote:76ciology wrote:
We got Morey.
You’re team will likely give up Edwards. Because your team is at the bottom of the food chain that teams on top likes to prey for your talents. Another thing is your team will do whatever it takes to just make the playoffs. Specially after the success of the Suns.
Darryl Morey has lost trades before too. Don't forget that.
I'm willing to bet that Edwards is not on the table especially for Simmons. Who are the wolves bidding against? The kings? They're not giving up Fox. Maybe you guys can get Lavine which would be a good fit or McCollum but I don't see any team giving up the asset that you think. Atleast not this offseason. I think his value increases if he stays with the Sixers one more year.
Yeah. But Morey likes to build with two guys who can take over games (yao+tmac or RW+Harden or cp3+Harden).
He’d be crazy if he sees that with Beasley and Rubio.
I’d trade Tobi for Cj then Ben for Love and Sexton, at worst
Embiid-MVP wrote:76ciology wrote:Raps top 5 pick? Pass.
Suggs isn’t gonna solve our problem.
I’ll ship it to a third team instead
Suggs is a future superstar. Gonna end up being the best player in the draft imo. Love him
bake51 wrote:76ciology wrote:bake51 wrote:
Darryl Morey has lost trades before too. Don't forget that.
I'm willing to bet that Edwards is not on the table especially for Simmons. Who are the wolves bidding against? The kings? They're not giving up Fox. Maybe you guys can get Lavine which would be a good fit or McCollum but I don't see any team giving up the asset that you think. Atleast not this offseason. I think his value increases if he stays with the Sixers one more year.
Yeah. But Morey likes to build with two guys who can take over games (yao+tmac or RW+Harden or cp3+Harden).
He’d be crazy if he sees that with Beasley and Rubio.
I’d trade Tobi for Cj then Ben for Love and Sexton, at worst
Completely agree. Beasley and Rubio would be laughable for you guys lol. You should keep Ben in that scenario.
76ciology wrote:Embiid-MVP wrote:76ciology wrote:Raps top 5 pick? Pass.
Suggs isn’t gonna solve our problem.
I’ll ship it to a third team instead
Suggs is a future superstar. Gonna end up being the best player in the draft imo. Love him
Im not saying that wont happen. But I’ll be surprise if that happens.
PhilaOwnsBoston wrote:It seems the general consensus among Sixers fans is McCollum is kind of the baseline for Simmons trades. Meaning, that’s the absolute lowest level player most fans will be even willing to consider and any player worse than that is “no thanks” unless of course that player who is “worse” is super young and has the potential to be much better than McCollum is now.
And even Sixers fan interest in McCollum is kind of divided, but I get the sense, anyone worse than him is where the line is drawn and all fans are in agreement on that.
Would people here agree with that general stance?
Slick SickSir wrote:CHRISTMAS HAS COME EARLY, THERE IS A GOD, REJOICE!!!
I finally can watch the sixers play effective 5v5 bball soon!!!
Mik317 wrote:PhilaOwnsBoston wrote:It seems the general consensus among Sixers fans is McCollum is kind of the baseline for Simmons trades. Meaning, that’s the absolute lowest level player most fans will be even willing to consider and any player worse than that is “no thanks” unless of course that player who is “worse” is super young and has the potential to be much better than McCollum is now.
And even Sixers fan interest in McCollum is kind of divided, but I get the sense, anyone worse than him is where the line is drawn and all fans are in agreement on that.
Would people here agree with that general stance?
CJ sucks imo.
He can shooot off the dribble sure but feels like he is easy to shut down. And thats kinda all he does. Which is fine because thats what we need I guess but meeeeeh.
Mik317 wrote:Slick SickSir wrote:CHRISTMAS HAS COME EARLY, THERE IS A GOD, REJOICE!!!
I finally can watch the sixers play effective 5v5 bball soon!!!
You will repent when we trade for another center and have Doc start him at the 2
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
PhilaOwnsBoston wrote:
I think he can be the 3rd best player on a championship team. However one defines that type of player. I think he's pretty good though. I mean, he's not a superstar, he's a fringe all star, but one of the better fringe all stars in the league IMO.
PhilaOwnsBoston wrote:It seems the general consensus among Sixers fans is McCollum is kind of the baseline for Simmons trades. Meaning, that’s the absolute lowest level player most fans will be even willing to consider and any player worse than that is “no thanks” unless of course that player who is “worse” is super young and has the potential to be much better than McCollum is now.
And even Sixers fan interest in McCollum is kind of divided, but I get the sense, anyone worse than him is where the line is drawn and all fans are in agreement on that.
Would people here agree with that general stance?
XtremeDunkz wrote:no to CJ, no to Lowry, no to Beal, no to the trash pile that TWolves fans keep trying to pawn off.
PhilaOwnsBoston wrote:What's people's issue with Beal? He's a stud. Sixers would be lucky to even have a chance at him for Simmons.