ImageImageImageImageImage

2021 Draft Thread - Part II

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#61 » by Ruzious » Mon Jul 12, 2021 4:03 pm

nate33 wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
payitforward wrote:I'm not as big a fan of Devin Booker as most people, but in any case I find it hard to see Bouknight as his type of player. Booker shot the 3 at .400 as a freshman. But he didn't rebound or handle the ball much. Bouknight does more of that stuff.

I guess, too, I'm not really convinced by Ingram either.

This is such a deep draft. My ideal is still to trade down with the Knicks plus buy another pick -- come away with 3 young players.


Bouknight is going to be a stud. Watch the film and you can see why. The guy is Zach Lavine with a higher defensive ceiling.

Springer is a Derrick White/Marcus Smart blend. My never be the lead guard on a contender, but will be PERFECT 3rd guard on his rookie contract.

To me, its
1) Giddey/Garuba/Wagner at 15
2) Trade down with NYK or Rockets (Picking up 2 of Duarte, Springer, Butler, Mann, Dosunmu, Petrusev, McBride, etc.)
3) Bouknight, Moody, Kispert at 15

You think Bouknight is Lavine with a higher defensive ceiling, but you'd rather have Garuba or Wagner?

I think most of us watched the Maryland game, and Bouknight stunk. He's definitely not the athlete that Lavine is, and he doesn't have a good jump shot. He looked like he's strictly an iso player who doesn't look for his teammates - the kind of player nobody wants to play with.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,216
And1: 2,779
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#62 » by pcbothwel » Mon Jul 12, 2021 4:31 pm

Ruzious wrote:
nate33 wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
Bouknight is going to be a stud. Watch the film and you can see why. The guy is Zach Lavine with a higher defensive ceiling.

Springer is a Derrick White/Marcus Smart blend. My never be the lead guard on a contender, but will be PERFECT 3rd guard on his rookie contract.

To me, its
1) Giddey/Garuba/Wagner at 15
2) Trade down with NYK or Rockets (Picking up 2 of Duarte, Springer, Butler, Mann, Dosunmu, Petrusev, McBride, etc.)
3) Bouknight, Moody, Kispert at 15

You think Bouknight is Lavine with a higher defensive ceiling, but you'd rather have Garuba or Wagner?

I think most of us watched the Maryland game, and Bouknight stunk. He's definitely not the athlete that Lavine is, and he doesn't have a good jump shot. He looked like he's strictly an iso player who doesn't look for his teammates - the kind of player nobody wants to play with.


Bouknight is strictly a 2, so He's a square peg on this current squad. Also, he may take a couple years to be legit contributor where I feel Garuba is a day one player and better fit
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,133
And1: 5,846
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#63 » by 80sballboy » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:01 pm

Interviewing a lot of undrafted rookie FAs. Ryan Daly? WTF. Must be a favor for someone.
Read on Twitter
?s=20
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#64 » by NatP4 » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:02 pm

Doesn’t feel like they have worked out very many guys who would go as high as 15. Lots of undrafted guys and a few late 1st guys.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,304
And1: 7,403
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#65 » by FAH1223 » Tue Jul 13, 2021 5:40 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,216
And1: 2,779
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#66 » by pcbothwel » Tue Jul 13, 2021 5:48 pm

Read on Twitter


There is something about him that I just think teams regret overlooking. I see Billups/Lowry/Jrue all over this kid. He's the perfect 3rd guard in the short term that can grow into his role.
Day 1 defender, High IQ, spot up shooter, and will draw fouls.
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,571
And1: 3,677
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#67 » by Frichuela » Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:00 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
Read on Twitter


There is something about him that I just think teams regret overlooking. I see Billups/Lowry/Jrue all over this kid. He's the perfect 3rd guard in the short term that can grow into his role.
Day 1 defender, High IQ, spot up shooter, and will draw fouls.


Agreed. If we stay at #15, he is potentially a great pick up for us. I don’t think he will last much longer if he’s not gone already. In a previous post, I included a comparison of his college stats to Dejounte Murray and Derrick White, and Springer looked quite comparable to both.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,156
And1: 7,925
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#68 » by Dat2U » Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:49 pm

Springer looking more explosive is good to hear. That's the one thing I was a little concerned about. He would be the safe pick and a good fit with some upside.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,156
And1: 7,925
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#69 » by Dat2U » Tue Jul 13, 2021 6:52 pm

It would be cool for Wagner, Giddey or Bouknight to fall but I'd be very content with Cooper or Springer.
mhd
General Manager
Posts: 9,640
And1: 1,682
Joined: Mar 25, 2004

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#70 » by mhd » Tue Jul 13, 2021 8:15 pm

Dat2U wrote:It would be cool for Wagner, Giddey or Bouknight to fall but I'd be very content with Cooper or Springer.



I don't think Wagner is going to fall. Looks like he has a promise in the 5-10 range.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#71 » by NatP4 » Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:20 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
Read on Twitter


There is something about him that I just think teams regret overlooking. I see Billups/Lowry/Jrue all over this kid. He's the perfect 3rd guard in the short term that can grow into his role.
Day 1 defender, High IQ, spot up shooter, and will draw fouls.


And some of the best intangibles in the draft. Has completely gotten over himself already at a young age. 100% a team first competitor.

I see so much Kyle Lowry in his game. If we end up with him, I won’t be disappointed at all.
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,571
And1: 3,677
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#72 » by Frichuela » Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:23 pm

Dat2U wrote:Springer looking more explosive is good to hear. That's the one thing I was a little concerned about. He would be the safe pick and a good fit with some upside.


Indeed. He scored the 7th best max vertical leap at the combine with 41.5 inches and the 5th best standing vertical leap at 34.5 inches :nod:
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#73 » by Ruzious » Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:49 pm

NatP4 wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
Read on Twitter


There is something about him that I just think teams regret overlooking. I see Billups/Lowry/Jrue all over this kid. He's the perfect 3rd guard in the short term that can grow into his role.
Day 1 defender, High IQ, spot up shooter, and will draw fouls.


And some of the best intangibles in the draft. Has completely gotten over himself already at a young age. 100% a team first competitor.

I see so much Kyle Lowry in his game. If we end up with him, I won’t be disappointed at all.

I like Springer, but I think he needs a couple of years to mature physically and gain confidence, and I see him more as a 2 than a combo guard. Honestly, almost no matter who's there at 15, I want to trade down and get 2 good players rather than 1.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#74 » by NatP4 » Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:50 pm

Blow it up:

Beal to Toronto for #4&filler
#15 for #21&#32
Rui and Bryant for Derrick White
Westbrook to the clippers for #25 and filler
#25 for #35 and #40

4: Jalen Suggs
21: Jared Butler
32: Neemius Queta
35: Joe Wieskamp
40: Isaiah Livers

Suggs Butler
White Mathews
Avdija Wieskamp Livers
Bertans Gill
Gafford Queta
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,472
And1: 2,126
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#75 » by Dark Faze » Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:31 am

It's a damn shame we can't see Giddey in the Olympics. Would be massively helpful information.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,156
And1: 7,925
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#76 » by Dat2U » Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:34 am

NatP4 wrote:Blow it up:

Beal to Toronto for #4&filler
#15 for #21&#32
Rui and Bryant for Derrick White
Westbrook to the clippers for #25 and filler
#25 for #35 and #40

4: Jalen Suggs
21: Jared Butler
32: Neemius Queta
35: Joe Wieskamp
40: Isaiah Livers

Suggs Butler
White Mathews
Avdija Wieskamp Livers
Bertans Gill
Gafford Queta


Congrats, that's a really really bad team.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,701
And1: 9,144
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#77 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 14, 2021 1:28 am

Ruzious wrote:...Honestly, almost no matter who's there at 15, I want to trade down and get 2 good players rather than 1.

Me too!
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,216
And1: 2,779
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#78 » by pcbothwel » Wed Jul 14, 2021 12:49 pm

Ruzious wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
Read on Twitter


There is something about him that I just think teams regret overlooking. I see Billups/Lowry/Jrue all over this kid. He's the perfect 3rd guard in the short term that can grow into his role.
Day 1 defender, High IQ, spot up shooter, and will draw fouls.


And some of the best intangibles in the draft. Has completely gotten over himself already at a young age. 100% a team first competitor.

I see so much Kyle Lowry in his game. If we end up with him, I won’t be disappointed at all.

I like Springer, but I think he needs a couple of years to mature physically and gain confidence, and I see him more as a 2 than a combo guard. Honestly, almost no matter who's there at 15, I want to trade down and get 2 good players rather than 1.


1) Physically Mature? He's the youngest US prospect in the draft and measured 6'3 and 202 lbs (6% Body Fat) with a 6'8 wingspan. The EXACT same measurements as Beal at the exact same age and he was a tank. So no, Physical maturation is far from making the list of things he NEEDS right now.

2) I agree he's not a pure 1, but I think thats an antiquated way to view guards anyway. Conley, Jrue, Lowry, Brogdon, Murray, Smart... I think those types of guys work better anyway, especially next to a high usage guard like Beal.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#79 » by Ruzious » Wed Jul 14, 2021 1:47 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
Ruzious wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
And some of the best intangibles in the draft. Has completely gotten over himself already at a young age. 100% a team first competitor.

I see so much Kyle Lowry in his game. If we end up with him, I won’t be disappointed at all.

I like Springer, but I think he needs a couple of years to mature physically and gain confidence, and I see him more as a 2 than a combo guard. Honestly, almost no matter who's there at 15, I want to trade down and get 2 good players rather than 1.


1) Physically Mature? He's the youngest US prospect in the draft and measured 6'3 and 202 lbs (6% Body Fat) with a 6'8 wingspan. The EXACT same measurements as Beal at the exact same age and he was a tank. So no, Physical maturation is far from making the list of things he NEEDS right now.

2) I agree he's not a pure 1, but I think thats an antiquated way to view guards anyway. Conley, Jrue, Lowry, Brogdon, Murray, Smart... I think those types of guys work better anyway, especially next to a high usage guard like Beal.

Beal was on the small side for a 2. For example, I remember watching him as a rookie against Harden, and he wasn't strong enough to handle Harden's size. As expected, he's physically matured since then. I expect similar physical maturation with Springer - especially considering how young he is. I don't think he is now what he'll be in a couple of years from now.

Let me try this again - I don't think he's a combo guard. I think he's strictly a 2. I don't think he's like Conley or Lowry at all, and I don't think he's much like Jrue, Brogdon, Murray, and Smart - though it's possible he will develop to be like one or more of them. That's my view, fwiw.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,701
And1: 9,144
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: 2021 Draft Thread - Part II 

Post#80 » by payitforward » Wed Jul 14, 2021 2:38 pm

It looks like people have named about 1/2 dozen guys all of whom look likely to be available at #15 & any of whom would seem to be a pretty good pick. In which case, at least one of them will also be available at #21. In fact, it's likely more than one guy on that list will still be there, since since the chances are good that a surprise or two will be picked along the way.

That's a good argument for trading down to #21 & getting the #32 in return -- if the Knicks want to deal, that is.

The Knicks have only 7 guys with guaranteed contracts -- for just under $50m. They also have a $1.8m option on Mitchell Robinson -- i.e. he's virtually certain to get a new deal this Summer. Randle will too.

This makes me less than optimistic that they'll want to trade 2 picks for a higher one. It'll depend on whether there's someone they really want.

OTOH, they have so much financial flexibility that they really might be a good destination for Bertans -- but that's for another thread.

Return to Washington Wizards