ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Seven)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Howard Cosell
Rookie
Posts: 1,181
And1: 313
Joined: Jun 01, 2013

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#521 » by Howard Cosell » Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:38 pm

ClarkeW wrote:What do people think about this as the basis of a deal?

TIMBERWOLVES
In: Ben Simmons, George Hill
Out: Ricky Rubio, Malik Beasley, Jarret Culver, Jake Layman, Two Protected 1st Round Picks

76ERS
In: Kyle Lowry, Malik Beasley, Jarret Culver, MIN Protected 1st Round Pick
Out: Ben Simmons, George Hill

RAPTORS
In: Ricky Rubio, Jake Layman, MIN Protected 1st Round Pick
Out: Kyle Lowry (S&T)

I think I’d be pretty happy with that honestly. Salaries should all match, and I feel like compensation is pretty fair for all three teams. Would leave us with a roster like this going into the season…

PG: D’Angelo Russell / George Hill
SG: Anthony Edwards / Jaylen Nowell
SF: Jaden McDaniels / Josh Okogie
PF: Ben Simmons / Juancho Hernangomez
C: Karl-Anthony Towns / Naz Reid

I love that starting lineup. I know George Hill’s contract isn’t guaranteed and we could cut him to make cap space, but I think he’s the type of veteran leader our bench would need with Rubio gone and he’s on a relatively affordable expiring contract (which could possibly be used at the deadline if this all goes to complete ****).

So what am I forgetting to factor in here that makes this trade non-feasible?


The trade you just laid out is pretty much the consensus on this board on what it would take to get the trade done for Simmons. Possibly Twolves would need to add another young positive asset like McDaniels or a 3rd FRP into the 3 team deal. But this is the best MN can do…now will see if another Western Conference team can or is willing to go over the top of MN and trade for Simmons.
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,240
And1: 1,930
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#522 » by Note30 » Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:40 pm

ClarkeW wrote:What do people think about this as the basis of a deal?

TIMBERWOLVES
In: Ben Simmons, George Hill
Out: Ricky Rubio, Malik Beasley, Jarret Culver, Jake Layman, Two Protected 1st Round Picks

76ERS
In: Kyle Lowry, Malik Beasley, Jarret Culver, MIN Protected 1st Round Pick
Out: Ben Simmons, George Hill

RAPTORS
In: Ricky Rubio, Jake Layman, MIN Protected 1st Round Pick
Out: Kyle Lowry (S&T)

I think I’d be pretty happy with that honestly. Salaries should all match, and I feel like compensation is pretty fair for all three teams. Would leave us with a roster like this going into the season…

PG: D’Angelo Russell / George Hill
SG: Anthony Edwards / Jaylen Nowell
SF: Jaden McDaniels / Josh Okogie
PF: Ben Simmons / Juancho Hernangomez
C: Karl-Anthony Towns / Naz Reid

I love that starting lineup. I know George Hill’s contract isn’t guaranteed and we could cut him to make cap space, but I think he’s the type of veteran leader our bench would need with Rubio gone and he’s on a relatively affordable expiring contract (which could possibly be used at the deadline if this all goes to complete ****).

So what am I forgetting to factor in here that makes this trade non-feasible?


Can you do a sign and trade like that?

Also personally it's a bad trade imo, but I am heavily against Simmons.

If we are trading with the Raptors I'd want to send them Culver, Layman, Reid, Juancho and a UFRP for Fred VanVleet.

I know we still have Rubio, but we could figure it out.
Howard Cosell
Rookie
Posts: 1,181
And1: 313
Joined: Jun 01, 2013

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#523 » by Howard Cosell » Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:45 pm

I don’t see Morey trading Simmons to an Eastern Conference team. There are a probably 3-4 Western Teams seriously interested in Simmons.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,086
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#524 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:48 pm

Howard Cosell wrote:I don’t see Morey trading Simmons to an Eastern Conference team. There are a probably 3-4 Western Teams seriously interested in Simmons.

And based on rumors of what teams will or won't include, I'm not terribly worried about losing out to them. I think we'll be right in the mix until the end.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,920
And1: 1,080
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#525 » by Dewey » Thu Jul 15, 2021 6:54 pm

Who wouldn’t want the rifleman and/or the Rube? I’d be a lot more interested in this trade rumor if we had lottery protected FRP’s… I willing to talk and willing to walk. Just need to get this squad stabilized
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,086
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#526 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 15, 2021 7:01 pm

Dewey wrote:Who wouldn’t want the rifleman and/or the Rube? I’d be a lot more interested in this trade rumor if we had lottery protected FRP’s… I willing to talk and willing to walk. Just need to get this squad stabilized

Just because no one is talking about pick protections doesn't mean they're saying the picks would be unprotected. I'm sure there'd be some sort of protection built in.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,086
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#527 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:18 pm

If you feel convicted about a purchase, I think you need to take the gamble. Rosas knows this about as well as anyone. I think Lore and Rodriguez understand this as well. Can't be gun shy. Some purchase might not end up like you hope, but that doesn't mean you stop taking risks.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#528 » by karch34 » Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:27 pm

Note30 wrote:
If we are trading with the Raptors I'd want to send them Culver, Layman, Reid, Juancho and a UFRP for Fred VanVleet.

I know we still have Rubio, but we could figure it out.


I’d want to do that trade too, but Ujiri would hang up the phone so fast it would make your head spin.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,574
And1: 6,664
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#529 » by shangrila » Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:41 pm

Domejandro wrote:
shangrila wrote:
Klomp wrote:"A five-out system will never work with Ben Simmons in the lineup." -RealGM


"You cannot use a one game sample size to prove others wrong." - shangrila

The entire crux of the anti-Simmons argument is a Playoff series where he shot historically bad from the free-throw line.

Frankly, when you look at Ben Simmons' entire body of work, it is pretty obvious that his offensive fit with Minnesota is excellent. The dude is an unbelievable cutter and finisher around the basket, his ability to finish is traffic is astonishing.

My point was not about the subject matter but the method.

You can't use a one game sample to prove anything, good or bad.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,513
And1: 7,064
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#530 » by XtremeDunkz » Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:45 pm

It's fine if you guys don't want to give anything for Simmons but you have to stop with the illusion that 36 year old Lowry is the missing piece to bringing Simmons in. The sixers would never do that lol.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,640
And1: 19,739
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#531 » by shrink » Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:02 pm

You forgot to say “3 time All Star” Ben Simmons like most PHI fans, but correctly ignored saying “6 time All Star” Kyle Lowry. Or that thirty-FIVE year old Lowry last year put up 17.2 PPG, 5.4 RPG, 7.3 APG, 39.6% 3P and good defense. Nah, he’s just some 36 (35) year old. “Lol”

Also, you’re welcome to lurk, but I hope you will note that half of us don’t want Simmons here regardless. We aren’t lying about what we think his value is, for whatever reason someone would do it to try to trick people on some internet board. I think Simmons is a one-way ticket to being stuck in the middle, with a salary and shooting issues at all levels, that cause so many problems that they leave little chance of escaping.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#532 » by Nick K » Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:09 pm

shrink wrote:
Domejandro wrote:
shangrila wrote:"You cannot use a one game sample size to prove others wrong." - shangrila

The entire crux of the anti-Simmons argument is a Playoff series where he shot historically bad from the free-throw line.

Frankly, when you look at Ben Simmons' entire body of work, it is pretty obvious that his offensive fit with Minnesota is excellent. The dude is an unbelievable cutter and finisher around the basket, his ability to finish is traffic is astonishing.

I’m with shangrila on this one. Every small sample compilation video can make even a college player look unstoppable.

Next, I watched the first 6-8 possessions, and none of them looked like a 5-out to me.

Finally, the “entire crux” of the anti-Simmons argument is not one playoff series with bad free throw shooting, it’s

1. A big max deal
2. His inability to shoot three pointers limits KAT’s match up ability. (Career: 14.7%)
3. His lack of improvement his whole career in shooting
4. His defender can clog the lane (because of his lack of shooting), making it harder for Edwards and others to drive the lane.
5. A lack of confidence that may remain where he refuses to shoot and is afraid to get fouled.
6. His poor free throw shooting makes a “Hack-a-Ben” strategy tough in the playoffs. (52% in 34 playoff games, not one bad series)

I understand hungry MIN fans rarely get nice shiny things, so everything looks better than it is to us. I also understand Simmons is one of the best defensive players in the league. But the offensive, financial, and mental risks (continued inability to shoot, getting worse) are there, and need to be factored into his valuation and fit on this team.


Good stuff. Right on!
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,086
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#533 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:13 pm

shrink wrote:If Simmons is on the floor, Gobert just stays underneath, right? And am I mislabeling a 5-out, where all five players can be a threat outside to make a three pointer, requiring they be guarded out there?

Sure, maybe Utah puts Gobert on Simmons instead of Towns. Why is this a bad thing to have our best player not be defended by their best player?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,640
And1: 19,739
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#534 » by shrink » Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:20 pm

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:If Simmons is on the floor, Gobert just stays underneath, right? And am I mislabeling a 5-out, where all five players can be a threat outside to make a three pointer, requiring they be guarded out there?

Sure, maybe Utah puts Gobert on Simmons instead of Towns. Why is this a bad thing to have our best player not be defended by their best player?

Are you really asking why it’s bad for Minnesota to let Utah play one of the greatest defensive players under the rim, play under the rim?

Gobert isn’t a great defensive player if his role is to play man-to-man out on the perimeter. Under the rim, he put up historic numbers the last few years reducing the number of shots opponents took in the paint, and altering the shots that were taken. Utah’s entire defensive scheme is designed to drive opponents at Gobert underneath. Anthony Edwards is not going to enjoy having Gobert waiting for him when he drives to the basket.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,558
And1: 31,018
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#535 » by Domejandro » Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:55 pm

shrink wrote:
Domejandro wrote:
shrink wrote:I’m with shangrila on this one. Every small sample compilation video can make even a college player look unstoppable.

Next, I watched the first 6-8 possessions, and none of them looked like a 5-out to me.

Finally, the “entire crux” of the anti-Simmons argument is not one playoff series with bad free throw shooting, it’s

1. A big max deal
2. His inability to shoot three pointers limits KAT’s match up ability. (Career: 14.7%)
3. His lack of improvement his whole career in shooting
4. His defender can clog the lane (because of his lack of shooting), making it harder for Edwards and others to drive the lane.
5. A lack of confidence that may remain where he refuses to shoot and is afraid to get fouled.
6. His poor free throw shooting makes a “Hack-a-Ben” strategy tough in the playoffs. (52% in 34 playoff games, not one bad series)

I understand MIN fans rarely get nice shiny things, so everything looks better than it is to us our hunger. I also understand Simmons is one of the best defensive players in the league. But the offensive, financial, and mental risks (continued inability to shoot, getting worse) are there, and need to be factored into his valuation and fit on this team.

The line-up is Seth Curry, Danny Green, Tobias Harris, Mike Scott, and Ben Simmons, that is the structure of a five-out line-up (look at the open lanes that Ben Simmons takes advantage of), despite Coach Rivers' bad offense.

Regardless, Ben Simmons absolutely does not undercut Karl-Anthony Towns' "match up ability". When you put a big on Ben Simmons, he is consistently able to drive passed them, especially when you put Simmons in pick-and-roll action (for example, that video shows him torching Derrick Favors in pick-and-roll as Philadelphia's center). You can look at any video, but I'll use the Utah game one there to illustrate it, look at the way in which Derrick Favors (who is objectively an incredibly mobile big man defensive player) is not able to pick up in space due to Simmons' elite screening technique. This happens to Gobert in the third quarter as well. In particular, his actions as a screener for Tobias Harris illustrate how frightening an Anthony Edwards and Ben Simmons pick-and-roll would be, given Simmons' ability to operate as a finisher and shovel passer.

The component that your "he can't shoot" analysis is missing (in my opinion) is that you are not incorporating how elite Ben Simmons is as a finisher. He rounds out the top-three tier alongside of Giannis Antetokounmpo and Zion Williams as elite wing finishers. Game three of this year's NBA finals had Giannis scoring forty-one points without making a single shot outside of four-feet. When you have that level of finishing ability as a ball-handler, you literally can't rotate your big man onto them because of their mobility (especially as cutters). This creates a matchup problem, given that Ben Simmons abuses smaller defenders.

The biggest component that does need to be fixed is his free-throw shooting. He is a career 59.7% free-throw shooter, the team would need to develop him into consistently shooting at least 65% from the line and maintain that during Playoff basketball; slightly over 60% is roughly the breakpoint where hack-a-[insert name] becomes bunk strategy, so I think 65% is what he needs to consistently reach. I think that is completely doable.

I appreciate this post. I am not the x’s-and-o’s guy that many are on this board, so I am constantly learning.

I would ask a question though

In the previous season, a pair of back-to-back UTA games had a profound affect on me. In the first game, the Jazz played Gobert on Towns, Rudy stayed close to the rim, and Towns torched him for like 9-for-13 three’s and a Wolves win. The next game, the Wolves continued to play with two big men that were credible three point threats. The Jazz had to counter by playing Rudy Gobert man-to-man on Towns, all the way out to the perimeter. One of the historically greatest defensive centers at altering and taking away shots underneath was forced to completely abandon his strength, because of the match up problems!

If Simmons is on the floor, Gobert just stays underneath, right? And am I mislabeling a 5-out, where all five players can be a threat outside to make a three pointer, requiring they be guarded out there?

Five-out is an offensive strategy the heavily emphasizes spacing and opening driving lanes by having mostly interchangeable players that can perform functions of ball-handling, shooting, and passing. Start at four minutes, this three minute section of this video is honestly the most succinct explanation of the offense I have ever seen, despite being a basic breakdown.



As you can see, there are moments in which there are non-elite shooters (Dwight Powell) and post-up possessions (Boban Marjanović), but it is more-so an offensive strategy that is easily modifiable for a screener/ball-handler of Simmons' caliber.

I decided to go back and watch the highlights to check, and found that pretty much all the instances of Towns torching Rudy Gobert off of the floor always had Josh Okogie in the game who - while technically more of a shooter than Ben Simmons - is also half a foot shorter and can't dribble around a folding chair. Pre-Finch, highlights often show Towns torching Gobert with Jarrett Culver/Ricky Rubio and Josh Okogie on the floor (with one hilarious highlight of Towns being surrounded by the horrifying shooting trio of Culver, Okogie, AND Treveon Graham.... YUCK!).

In any case, I don't have time for a full writeup, but Rudy Gobert literally cannot guard Ben Simmons in space, he is not nearly mobile enough and would get torched because of Ben Simmons' handle and cutting ability (there is evidence of that). If Towns gets Royce O'Neal (or whomever) switched onto him (which they wouldn't do unless it is a direct Town/Simmons ball screen situation), Towns would eat Royce O'Neal alive because of his size (the highlights literally show evidence of actions where Gobert stays in the paint and Towns torches smaller players on the perimeter). Functionally, Ben Simmons' ability to handle, pass, cut, and screen at 6'10 makes him a serious threat in any zone, given that he is an elite finisher in traffic (>65% under five feet on seven attempts per game, despite teams packing the paint on his drives). If you watch Philadelphia, teams rarely put their big man on Ben Simmons, given that he is too mobile and Joel Embiid presents too many match-up problems for smaller players.

To put it succinctly for time reasons, even if that was a concern (which it just isn't), Karl-Anthony Towns would still feast against the smaller player. Plus, this is all offensive talk that ignores him literally being a 6'10"-11" player that literally can go from defending Stephen Curry on the perimeter to bodying elite NBA centers; his defensive ability is freakish.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,571
And1: 2,935
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#536 » by Neeva » Thu Jul 15, 2021 11:42 pm

XtremeDunkz wrote:It's fine if you guys don't want to give anything for Simmons but you have to stop with the illusion that 36 year old Lowry is the missing piece to bringing Simmons in. The sixers would never do that lol.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

You are in ultimate win now mode before Embiids body finally gives out in 3-4 seasons, lets be real.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#537 » by Nick K » Fri Jul 16, 2021 12:49 am

karch34 wrote:
Note30 wrote:
If we are trading with the Raptors I'd want to send them Culver, Layman, Reid, Juancho and a UFRP for Fred VanVleet.

I know we still have Rubio, but we could figure it out.


I’d want to do that trade too, but Ujiri would hang up the phone so fast it would make your head spin.


I'm with note30 on this. Why would Ujiri reject that? Lowry wants out. I'll repeat that Lowry wants out. Ujiri has no leverage. Philly doesn't have much leverage either because they have thrown Simmons under the bus and he wants out.

I'll bet when the time comes cooler heads prevail and a more modest price gets the deal done.

Shooting is the single most important skill in the modern game. Great shooting and ball movement nullifies great defense.

Passing is nice but a far less important skill. Simmons can put the ball on the floor and score big time. I love that about him most. Yet you have to make the free throws when you get to the line. We have the problem there. The defense is nice no doubt.

How will Simmons play without the ball in his hands all the time? I want the ball in Dlo and Ant's hands. Has anybody thought about that? Can he be an inside player? Please respond. Sell me on the vision.

I am going to trust Rosas on this one to do the right thing because 34 mil for a guy who is a great defender who can't shoot and is playing out of position is nuts. Not to mention all the players and picks we have going out.

That said, I can live with Rubio, Beasley, Okogie and 1 first unprotected going out for this experiment. I am going to trust Rosas on this one to do the right thing.

Ant won't be happy losing Rubio.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#538 » by Nick K » Fri Jul 16, 2021 1:07 am

Domejandro wrote:
shrink wrote:
Domejandro wrote:The line-up is Seth Curry, Danny Green, Tobias Harris, Mike Scott, and Ben Simmons, that is the structure of a five-out line-up (look at the open lanes that Ben Simmons takes advantage of), despite Coach Rivers' bad offense.

Regardless, Ben Simmons absolutely does not undercut Karl-Anthony Towns' "match up ability". When you put a big on Ben Simmons, he is consistently able to drive passed them, especially when you put Simmons in pick-and-roll action (for example, that video shows him torching Derrick Favors in pick-and-roll as Philadelphia's center). You can look at any video, but I'll use the Utah game one there to illustrate it, look at the way in which Derrick Favors (who is objectively an incredibly mobile big man defensive player) is not able to pick up in space due to Simmons' elite screening technique. This happens to Gobert in the third quarter as well. In particular, his actions as a screener for Tobias Harris illustrate how frightening an Anthony Edwards and Ben Simmons pick-and-roll would be, given Simmons' ability to operate as a finisher and shovel passer.

The component that your "he can't shoot" analysis is missing (in my opinion) is that you are not incorporating how elite Ben Simmons is as a finisher. He rounds out the top-three tier alongside of Giannis Antetokounmpo and Zion Williams as elite wing finishers. Game three of this year's NBA finals had Giannis scoring forty-one points without making a single shot outside of four-feet. When you have that level of finishing ability as a ball-handler, you literally can't rotate your big man onto them because of their mobility (especially as cutters). This creates a matchup problem, given that Ben Simmons abuses smaller defenders.

The biggest component that does need to be fixed is his free-throw shooting. He is a career 59.7% free-throw shooter, the team would need to develop him into consistently shooting at least 65% from the line and maintain that during Playoff basketball; slightly over 60% is roughly the breakpoint where hack-a-[insert name] becomes bunk strategy, so I think 65% is what he needs to consistently reach. I think that is completely doable.

I appreciate this post. I am not the x’s-and-o’s guy that many are on this board, so I am constantly learning.

I would ask a question though

In the previous season, a pair of back-to-back UTA games had a profound affect on me. In the first game, the Jazz played Gobert on Towns, Rudy stayed close to the rim, and Towns torched him for like 9-for-13 three’s and a Wolves win. The next game, the Wolves continued to play with two big men that were credible three point threats. The Jazz had to counter by playing Rudy Gobert man-to-man on Towns, all the way out to the perimeter. One of the historically greatest defensive centers at altering and taking away shots underneath was forced to completely abandon his strength, because of the match up problems!

If Simmons is on the floor, Gobert just stays underneath, right? And am I mislabeling a 5-out, where all five players can be a threat outside to make a three pointer, requiring they be guarded out there?

Five-out is an offensive strategy the heavily emphasizes spacing and opening driving lanes by having mostly interchangeable players that can perform functions of ball-handling, shooting, and passing. Start at four minutes, this three minute section of this video is honestly the most succinct explanation of the offense I have ever seen, despite being a basic breakdown.



As you can see, there are moments in which there are non-elite shooters (Dwight Powell) and post-up possessions (Boban Marjanović), but it is more-so an offensive strategy that is easily modifiable for a screener/ball-handler of Simmons' caliber.

I decided to go back and watch the highlights to check, and found that pretty much all the instances of Towns torching Rudy Gobert off of the floor always had Josh Okogie in the game who - while technically more of a shooter than Ben Simmons - is also half a foot shorter and can't dribble around a folding chair. Pre-Finch, highlights often show Towns torching Gobert with Jarrett Culver/Ricky Rubio and Josh Okogie on the floor (with one hilarious highlight of Towns being surrounded by the horrifying shooting trio of Culver, Okogie, AND Treveon Graham.... YUCK!).

In any case, I don't have time for a full writeup, but Rudy Gobert literally cannot guard Ben Simmons in space, he is not nearly mobile enough and would get torched because of Ben Simmons' handle and cutting ability (there is evidence of that). If Towns gets Royce O'Neal (or whomever) switched onto him (which they wouldn't do unless it is a direct Town/Simmons ball screen situation), Towns would eat Royce O'Neal alive because of his size (the highlights literally show evidence of actions where Gobert stays in the paint and Towns torches smaller players on the perimeter). Functionally, Ben Simmons' ability to handle, pass, cut, and screen at 6'10 makes him a serious threat in any zone, given that he is an elite finisher in traffic (>65% under five feet on seven attempts per game, despite teams packing the paint on his drives). If you watch Philadelphia, teams rarely put their big man on Ben Simmons, given that he is too mobile and Joel Embiid presents too many match-up problems for smaller players.

To put it succinctly for time reasons, even if that was a concern (which it just isn't), Karl-Anthony Towns would still feast against the smaller player. Plus, this is all offensive talk that ignores him literally being a 6'10"-11" player that literally can go from defending Stephen Curry on the perimeter to bodying elite NBA centers; his defensive ability is freakish.


I like this post domejandro. It helps sell me on Simmons. My concern is can he block out and rebound like a demon inside playing out of position for him? Can he accept that role. If it's yes to both I'm more eager for the trade. I still have my doubts. Help me out.
User avatar
King Malta
Starter
Posts: 2,328
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jun 24, 2013
Location: The Lottery
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#539 » by King Malta » Fri Jul 16, 2021 1:15 am

shrink wrote:
King Malta wrote:
shrink wrote:You’d probably be right. Supposedly as the GM in HOU, Morey’s standard M.O. was to flood other GM’s with lots of one-sided offers, hoping one would stick. The story was that it became kind of a joke with the GM community. It sounds like Rosas may have adopted the same strategy.

Incidentally, this isn’t necessarily a good strategy. As I mentioned recently on the Trade Board, it might work if you’re Rick from Pawn Stars, where you are likely having a one-time interaction with a seller or buyer. However, in situations where you may exchange multiple different offers over a long time span, your reputation matters. This is standard game theory, or maybe people here may be more familiar with fantasy sports.

There always seems to be one guy in your league that is continually sending you bad trade offers. The first few you can laugh off, thinking he may just have a different valuation of these individual guys. After a while though, over multiple bad deals and multiple bad valuations, you realize the only consistent factor here is you. Enough bad deals, and it is insulting, like he is questioning your intelligence or fitness as a manager. When someone gets this reputation, you are less likely to trade with them, suspicious if you ever get an offer that’s even close (what am I missing?) and when you have things to sell, he is the last person you contact.

Morey is usually thought of as a great GM, and he had some early successes as a trader, particularly identifying that Harden would be excellent in a larger role. However, his later years haven’t been great, and it makes me wonder if this strategy is wearing thin with many GM’s. It also worries me that as a Morey disciple, Rosas may end up overpaying in a Morey deal.


Tbh I think you're overanalsying this a little.

Nobody opens negotiations at the exact point they're willing to cede on, that wouldn't make any sense. The Sixers are very early in the process (lol) of this trade and they're clearly going to start off asking for more than they'll likely settle on.

No different from selling a used car or TV really.

You’re not the first to accuse me of over-analyzing! :lol:

I agree with you in principle. An opening offer can be low, but it can’t be insulting, and it especially can’t be insulting over and over again.

In any good transaction, both sides come out as winners. A loaf of bread might be worth 50 cents to the baker, but worth a dollar to the hungry man. Both sides win if they make a trade for any price between 51 cents and 99 cents — the final price simply determines how much each sides wins. If Morey is the baker, and he keeps asking for $1.50, eventually the hungry man looks for a different baker.

Also, keep in mind that if you want repeat customers, you might even start with the a consistent fair price. WalMart is going to sell you bread for 65 cents, no haggling from either side. At that price, you both profit and they want you to keep coming back.


It's why we love you :lol:

I essentially agree with everything you've written there to be honest, but I do think that when you're selling the kind of asset Philly are selling, you have to play the game very carefully to ensure you get maximum value. Being an NBA GM generally gives you little room for error anyway, as one trade mistake could set you back years, but this Simmons trade could effect the trajectory of Philly like very few other moves they've made in recent times.

The return they get here will determine whether they continue to treadmill during Embiid's prime or actually get out of the East and potentially win a championship.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#540 » by karch34 » Fri Jul 16, 2021 2:42 am

Nick K wrote:
karch34 wrote:
Note30 wrote:
If we are trading with the Raptors I'd want to send them Culver, Layman, Reid, Juancho and a UFRP for Fred VanVleet.

I know we still have Rubio, but we could figure it out.


I’d want to do that trade too, but Ujiri would hang up the phone so fast it would make your head spin.


I'm with note30 on this. Why would Ujiri reject that? Lowry wants out. I'll repeat that Lowry wants out. Ujiri has no leverage. Philly doesn't have much leverage either because they have thrown Simmons under the bus and he wants out.

I'll bet when the time comes cooler heads prevail and a more modest price gets the deal done.

Shooting is the single most important skill in the modern game. Great shooting and ball movement nullifies great defense.

Passing is nice but a far less important skill. Simmons can put the ball on the floor and score big time. I love that about him most. Yet you have to make the free throws when you get to the line. We have the problem there. The defense is nice no doubt.

How will Simmons play without the ball in his hands all the time? I want the ball in Dlo and Ant's hands. Has anybody thought about that? Can he be an inside player? Please respond. Sell me on the vision.

I am going to trust Rosas on this one to do the right thing because 34 mil for a guy who is a great defender who can't shoot and is playing out of position is nuts. Not to mention all the players and picks we have going out.

That said, I can live with Rubio, Beasley, Okogie and 1 first unprotected going out for this experiment. I am going to trust Rosas on this one to do the right thing.

Ant won't be happy losing Rubio.


Lowry wanting out has nothing to do with us trading our crap for Fred VanVleet. That was my point. He was not talking about a Lowry trade as far as what I responded to.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves