Build a Franchise- Season 5 Discussion thread- Announcement on page 79

[HEZI]

I have no sense of who will be available to me with my mid-first round picks.

This draft class really flattens out quite a bit. There could be some drastically different picks in our draft compared to IRL. Guys getting picked 20+ picks away, wayyyy more often than in a usual draft.

Personally I like more guys projected to go in the later part of the 1st round and into the 2nd round more than I like some of the guys projected to go in the middle of the 1st

[mpharris36]

I have no sense of who will be available to me with my mid-first round picks.

its an interesting draft after you get through the mid lottery you can kinda see picks in the 8-9-10 range for some teams go in the late teens range maybe even 20's for others. Just depends how you evaluate them and your needs.

[Capn'O]

I have no sense of who will be available to me with my mid-first round picks.

This draft class really flattens out quite a bit. There could be some drastically different picks in our draft compared to IRL. Guys getting picked 20+ picks away, wayyyy more often than in a usual draft.

Does it? I feel like there are a ton of risk/ reward guys later. Ie I have no **** clue.

[wackbone]

I have no sense of who will be available to me with my mid-first round picks.

This draft class really flattens out quite a bit. There could be some drastically different picks in our draft compared to IRL. Guys getting picked 20+ picks away, wayyyy more often than in a usual draft.

Does it? I feel like there are a ton of risk/ reward guys later. Ie I have no **** clue.

I agree with you, but I feel like from like 6 on is a lot of risk/reward guys. To go a little further along, I don't see much of a substantial difference between like 12 and 32 in this draft, talent-of-the-players-wise.

[Capn'O]

This draft class really flattens out quite a bit. There could be some drastically different picks in our draft compared to IRL. Guys getting picked 20+ picks away, wayyyy more often than in a usual draft.

Does it? I feel like there are a ton of risk/ reward guys later. Ie I have no **** clue.

I agree with you, but I feel like from like 6 on is a lot of risk/reward guys. To go a little further along, I don't see much of a substantial difference between like 12 and 32 in this draft, talent-of-the-players-wise.

There are two guys I see as sure bets in that range but I don't think I can get them.

[wackbone]

Does it? I feel like there are a ton of risk/ reward guys later. Ie I have no **** clue.

I agree with you, but I feel like from like 6 on is a lot of risk/reward guys. To go a little further along, I don't see much of a substantial difference between like 12 and 32 in this draft, talent-of-the-players-wise.

There are two guys I see as sure bets in that range but I don't think I can get them.

So you might say that guys from like 14-32 are similar talent wise in this draft? See what I mean? And hell, I might even extend that backend into the 40s.

[Capn'O]

I agree with you, but I feel like from like 6 on is a lot of risk/reward guys. To go a little further along, I don't see much of a substantial difference between like 12 and 32 in this draft, talent-of-the-players-wise.

There are two guys I see as sure bets in that range but I don't think I can get them.

So you might say that guys from like 14-32 are similar talent wise in this draft? See what I mean? And hell, I might even extend that backend into the 40s.

I'm sure you know better than i.

[wackbone]

There are two guys I see as sure bets in that range but I don't think I can get them.

So you might say that guys from like 14-32 are similar talent wise in this draft? See what I mean? And hell, I might even extend that backend into the 40s.

I'm sure you know better than i.

Well to be honest, I have only really "scouted" guys in the teens and below. I know quite a bit about the top 4, but not a whole ton about like 5-12, unless they were making plays in the tourney.

[wackbone]

I also now have 5 picks in the 22-45 range, so I better be read up lol

[Capn'O]

Also, the lack of guys with funny names has really hurt my scouting.

[DOT]

Just sent in my top 3 to bish, in case I'm stuck at work tomorrow

Was kind of tough, cause I have Green rated #2 irl, but I think the fact I have 1 elite guard and I'm really high on Garland becoming an elite guard, plus the sim showing favoritism to bigs makes it about even with Mobley

Though I do hope mp takes Green 2nd. Don't want to see him go 4th. But if mp takes Mobley, I'll be more than happy with Green.

[mpharris36]

Also, the lack of guys with funny names has really hurt my scouting.

I was actually looking for players with funny names for you the other day

[Capn'O]

Also, the lack of guys with funny names has really hurt my scouting.

I was actually looking for players with funny names for you the other day

What a thoughtful thing for you to do. Thank you.

[Context]

Watch on YouTube

[Context]

oh this is going to be epic!

[mpharris36]

[Context]

[mpharris36]

Spoiler:

Rookie of the Year


[spoiler]James Wiseman- San Antonio Spurs
21.4PPG 0.8APG 10.9RPG 0.5SPG 2.5BPG

[ribs]

[Context]