SWedd523 wrote:I look at a potential Turner trade like this:
Hayward + Kai/Sengun/etc
Or
Turner + Moody/Keon/Kispert/Cam/etc
Which would you rather have? Which would make the team better short and long term?
I wouldnt want to add anything to Hayward or Rozier in a deal for Turner. I'd consider Hayward for Turner + salary filler, or Rozier for Hayward. I wouldn't want to even do the trade back unless the guy I wanted or someone equivalent was going to be there at 11. I think I'm getting on the Sengun bandwagon and definitely wouldn't trade the pick if hes there at 11.
Rozier is better than Turner imo and they have pretty much the same contract, so I don't see why wed need to add any value and if anything Id probably see if I could get them to give us an extra 2nd (maybe a swap).
Its trickier with Hayward because his contract is pretty bad, but Indiana isn't paying for the Batum stretch, so I don't think its quite as bad as some of us think in the context of trying to trade him to another team (still bad though for sure). The pick swap is a pretty marginal value loss in a vacuum and it would be sooo nice to get off Haywards contract, though, so I definitely get the appeal. It might just depend on how the draft turned out for me.
Idk, I guess I just feel like the franchise is finally in a good spot and should be patient. I crap on Turner a lot, but he is kind of nice. I just don't really feel any need to lose any value to address short term needs when the franchise player is 20 and they were like the 5th youngest team in the league last season when weighted for minutes played. Before all the injuries the team was looking like they were on track for a 5/6 seed last season with pretty much the worst center rotation imaginable and rookie Melo as the best player. The bar is so low that there should be options to improve the center position in the short term cheaply, so I would be totally fine with looking for stop gap options and addressing the situation long term through the draft or by waiting for a better trade opportunity.