ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Seven)

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#821 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:10 am

wolves_89 wrote:I'd compare Nance to a 25lb heavier version of Vanderbilt in terms of defense/rebounding. On offense he isn't going to carry a team, but he isn't going to be a major negative like Okogie/Vando. Teams will at least have to guard him on the perimeter.


I'd much prefer Vanderbilt over Nance, considering age, skill sets, similar low usage, and contract situations. Vanderbilt only 22 and Nance has gotten worse every year over the last 4 years. Not a great trend for a guy that relies on athleticism so much.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,810
And1: 23,116
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#822 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:21 am

Krapinsky wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I'd compare Nance to a 25lb heavier version of Vanderbilt in terms of defense/rebounding. On offense he isn't going to carry a team, but he isn't going to be a major negative like Okogie/Vando. Teams will at least have to guard him on the perimeter.


I'd much prefer Vanderbilt over Nance, considering age, skill sets, similar low usage, and contract situations. Vanderbilt only 22 and Nance has gotten worse every year over the last 4 years. Not a great trend for a guy that relies on athleticism so much.

Why does it have to be one over the other? Why not both?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#823 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:29 am

Klomp wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I'd compare Nance to a 25lb heavier version of Vanderbilt in terms of defense/rebounding. On offense he isn't going to carry a team, but he isn't going to be a major negative like Okogie/Vando. Teams will at least have to guard him on the perimeter.


I'd much prefer Vanderbilt over Nance, considering age, skill sets, similar low usage, and contract situations. Vanderbilt only 22 and Nance has gotten worse every year over the last 4 years. Not a great trend for a guy that relies on athleticism so much.

Why does it have to be one over the other? Why not both?


It certainly can be both, but I suppose the point I was trying to make in this comparison is how little I value Nance as an asset for this team.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#824 » by Nick K » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:35 am

TheProdigy wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Has any non-wolves player been discussed more on this board than Larry Nance, Jr? We must have compiled a hundred plus pages over the year debating the merits of this league average forward.

If there was ever a team where he should have made an impact it was Cleveland last year with its void in the front court. Yet, he somehow only managed 1.8 winshares the entire season. Are we sure he is any good?

Aaron Gordon was another guy that got discussed way too much on this board before he got traded to the Nuggets.

I view Larry Nance in a similar way to Jae Crowder. They obviously have different skillsets, but they're similar in that they're both low usage role players who tend to look really good on good teams but also tend to look average to below average on bad teams. Cleveland was a dumpster fire last year, and I think Nance would look alot better surrounded by KAT, DLo, Ant, Beasley, etc.


TheProdigy, you make a hell of a lot of sense to me with Nance. I like him too but was hoping for more of a difference maker. I was close to getting on board with him but you have tipped me over the edge. Just as long as he can rebound, box out and not get moved off by other bigs, i'm in. It's not always about starpower you need the right pieces to fit.
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 559
And1: 301
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#825 » by fattymcgee » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:40 am

Norseman79 wrote:
fattymcgee wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
I agree with all of this. 6'10 plus or don't bother. Finch wants legit size in the front court...more than just weight. If Nance costs you Culver, Juancho or Layman do it. I wouldn't give up anything better and I wouldn't consider Nance our starting PF.


It's rare to find a 6'10" PF anymore now that the NBA measures players barefoot instead of in shoes. Historically the prototypical PFs have been 6'8" - 6'9" barefoot.


Huh, I feel like I could name a bunch.... Simmons, Isaac, Jackson Jr., Porzingis, Davis, Giannis, Durant, Sabonis for starters...you do have guys who are shorter that play the four... does not mean I want them.

I would take Kuzma over Nance...but that depends what Nance's pricetag is. As said, if it's Culver and Layman....sold. we have a new backup PF who can start until we find a good starter


Before I looked these up I thought more of them were over 6'10". With about 75 PF in the NBA I stand by what I said that it's rare to have a PF that is actually over 6'10".

Issac was just under 6'11" in shoes which means he was under 6'10" barefoot.
Ben Simmons 6'9.5" IN SHOES
Jaren Jackson Jr. Is considered a tall PF yet was 6'9 3/4" barefoot
Porzingis = giant
Durant was 6'9" barefoot at the draft
A.D. was 6'9 1/4" barefoot
Sabonis was listed at 6'10" pre-draft, not sure shoeless height
Giannis was drafted at 6'8 1/2" but grew to 6'11".

Larry Nance was 6'7 1/2" barefoot which means he is about 2" shorter than the guys listed who are considered tall for a PF. Nance is about average height for a PF and has a 7'1 1/2" wingspan and 9' standing reach which are above average. Nance definitely has good size for a PF but does he have the skillz?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,810
And1: 23,116
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#826 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:52 am

Krapinsky wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:I'd compare Nance to a 25lb heavier version of Vanderbilt in terms of defense/rebounding. On offense he isn't going to carry a team, but he isn't going to be a major negative like Okogie/Vando. Teams will at least have to guard him on the perimeter.


I'd much prefer Vanderbilt over Nance, considering age, skill sets, similar low usage, and contract situations. Vanderbilt only 22 and Nance has gotten worse every year over the last 4 years. Not a great trend for a guy that relies on athleticism so much.

Vanderbilt is still mostly potential. I'd argue Nance already is what we're hoping Vanderbilt can become.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,810
And1: 23,116
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#827 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:56 am

This is part of what we're up against on their end

"How cool is it for him to come home? The kid was in borderline tears when I called him today," Altman said during a conference call to recap his watershed moment as GM. "He's ecstatic to be a part of it."

https://www.cleveland.com/cavs/2018/02/larry_nance_jr_was_in_borderli.html
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,568
And1: 31,034
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#828 » by Domejandro » Thu Jul 29, 2021 2:59 am

If you can get Larry Nance Jr. for Juancho Hernangómez, Jarrett Culver, and a couple seconds, you obviously take it and run.

Not even discussion worthy.
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,443
And1: 1,130
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#829 » by TheProdigy » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:02 am

Nick K wrote:
TheProdigy wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Has any non-wolves player been discussed more on this board than Larry Nance, Jr? We must have compiled a hundred plus pages over the year debating the merits of this league average forward.

If there was ever a team where he should have made an impact it was Cleveland last year with its void in the front court. Yet, he somehow only managed 1.8 winshares the entire season. Are we sure he is any good?

Aaron Gordon was another guy that got discussed way too much on this board before he got traded to the Nuggets.

I view Larry Nance in a similar way to Jae Crowder. They obviously have different skillsets, but they're similar in that they're both low usage role players who tend to look really good on good teams but also tend to look average to below average on bad teams. Cleveland was a dumpster fire last year, and I think Nance would look alot better surrounded by KAT, DLo, Ant, Beasley, etc.


TheProdigy, you make a hell of a lot of sense to me with Nance. I like him too but was hoping for more of a difference maker. I was close to getting on board with him but you have tipped me over the edge. Just as long as he can rebound, box out and not get moved off by other bigs, i'm in. It's not always about starpower you need the right pieces to fit.

I think he's a good fit but he's not the final piece to the puzzle. The injuries are a major concern. He's been in the league for 6 years and he's never played more than 70 games in a season. If we get him, we will need to have really good depth at the power forward position so we can manage injuries.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,589
And1: 2,949
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#830 » by Neeva » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:02 am

Krapinsky wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
I'd much prefer Vanderbilt over Nance, considering age, skill sets, similar low usage, and contract situations. Vanderbilt only 22 and Nance has gotten worse every year over the last 4 years. Not a great trend for a guy that relies on athleticism so much.

Why does it have to be one over the other? Why not both?


It certainly can be both, but I suppose the point I was trying to make in this comparison is how little I value Nance as an asset for this team.


You would need another PF because Nance is likely to
miss half the season.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,810
And1: 23,116
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#831 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 29, 2021 3:08 am

Neeva wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:
Klomp wrote:Why does it have to be one over the other? Why not both?


It certainly can be both, but I suppose the point I was trying to make in this comparison is how little I value Nance as an asset for this team.


You would need another PF because Nance is likely to
miss half the season.

All teams need more than one player at each position. That's why rosters are 15 deep instead of 5.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#832 » by moonpie » Thu Jul 29, 2021 4:34 am

Is Nance some superstar PF? No. He's not going to elevate a team by himself to playoff contention or anything, but he's the type of glue guy/intangibles/locker room presence/whatever you want to call it that compliments all of our players well, has previous chemistry with DLO from their Laker days, and would be a dream for Finch to coach probably.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,583
And1: 6,674
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#833 » by shangrila » Thu Jul 29, 2021 4:34 am

Klomp wrote:This is part of what we're up against on their end

"How cool is it for him to come home? The kid was in borderline tears when I called him today," Altman said during a conference call to recap his watershed moment as GM. "He's ecstatic to be a part of it."

https://www.cleveland.com/cavs/2018/02/larry_nance_jr_was_in_borderli.html

Pretty sure Nance denied that almost immediately so I'm not sure how much stock I'd put in it.
UnFadeable21
Veteran
Posts: 2,712
And1: 845
Joined: Mar 30, 2019

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#834 » by UnFadeable21 » Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:54 am

Read on Twitter
?s=21
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#835 » by Nick K » Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:15 am

UnFadeable21 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21


Really smart move on the Lakers part. Hield would be great there. Plus they get rid of a few guys they'd give away for free if they could.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,589
And1: 2,949
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#836 » by Neeva » Thu Jul 29, 2021 9:27 am

They will be wanting to get rid of hield for free like sac after next season lol
User avatar
_AIJ_
RealGM
Posts: 14,168
And1: 4,644
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#837 » by _AIJ_ » Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:28 am

A lot of people will be disappointed tonight.
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 8-)
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,810
And1: 23,116
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#838 » by Klomp » Thu Jul 29, 2021 12:19 pm

shangrila wrote:
Klomp wrote:This is part of what we're up against on their end

"How cool is it for him to come home? The kid was in borderline tears when I called him today," Altman said during a conference call to recap his watershed moment as GM. "He's ecstatic to be a part of it."

https://www.cleveland.com/cavs/2018/02/larry_nance_jr_was_in_borderli.html

Pretty sure Nance denied that almost immediately so I'm not sure how much stock I'd put in it.

Denied what? That he was excited that he now plays for his hometown team?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,583
And1: 6,674
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#839 » by shangrila » Thu Jul 29, 2021 1:00 pm

Klomp wrote:
shangrila wrote:
Klomp wrote:This is part of what we're up against on their end

"How cool is it for him to come home? The kid was in borderline tears when I called him today," Altman said during a conference call to recap his watershed moment as GM. "He's ecstatic to be a part of it."

https://www.cleveland.com/cavs/2018/02/larry_nance_jr_was_in_borderli.html

Pretty sure Nance denied that almost immediately so I'm not sure how much stock I'd put in it.

Denied what? That he was excited that he now plays for his hometown team?

He denied that he was "borderline in tears" and, IIRC, said something to the effect of "it's cool" to play in Cleveland.

The point is he's not going to go to them to beg them not to trade him, so I'm not sure what we're supposed to be up against.
User avatar
_AIJ_
RealGM
Posts: 14,168
And1: 4,644
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#840 » by _AIJ_ » Thu Jul 29, 2021 1:07 pm

I think Juancho, Culver, Layman are all gone after tonight
LETS GO WOLVES!!! 8-)

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves