emunney wrote:Licensed to Il wrote:emunney wrote:We can **** on Kyrie all we want (and I'm sure I will also), but he's doing some terrific stuff with at least a portion of his money and influence that is materially bettering the lives of other people.
Sure, but that really doesn’t give a person the right to be a massive a hole in regards to how they treat the other half of the people they interact with.
We don’t give a pass to a police officer that is respectful and helpful 3/4 of their shifts.
We don’t excuse a physician who has great bedside manner with 1/2 of his patients.
Kyrie has over a hundred million dollars and a significant platform and appears to be a force for good, 1/2 the time (and a spectacularly out of touch arrogant jerk the other half. I think the bar should be higher.
Ok but apply it universally, because most of these guys are just ****.
Good ethical question. Is it better to be a nice guy and never do anything with your wealth or be a pain in the ass and help thousands of people? I think I'd go with the last one.
Any documentation of what Kyrie has/is doing?

















