ImageImageImage

[Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash.

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,433
And1: 2,853
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#161 » by Neeva » Sat Jul 31, 2021 7:12 pm

Klomp wrote:Let me look at this trade from an angle that hasn't really been discussed.

Read on Twitter


While Dane brings up the pick's usefulness as ammo, I want to discuss the merit of having it and keeping it.

We were all disappointed about not having a pick on Thursday night. However, this wasn't a particularly deep draft and the Wolves don't necessarily have the roster spots to spare. Once Bolmaro signs his rookie scale deal, we will have 13 players under contract (plus two RFAs in Vanderbilt and McLaughlin). Whoever we added probably would've been a long shot to make the team.

Meanwhile, we added a second round pick next year when things really start to open up. Prince and Layman will be UFAs, Culver's 2022-23 option will likely be declined making him a UFA, Juancho is unguaranteed and Okogie is an RFA. While I know many are hoping most of those guys are gone this summer, it's still likely there will be more roster spots available, so having up to four picks in the draft could be super useful.


This years draft second round was bare bones but next years draft does not look all that better.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,285
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#162 » by shrink » Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:10 pm

People tend to over-value second round picks, and I’ve seen Star trades on the Trade Board fail to reach an agreement because posters refused to give up a second.

Here’s a fun fact for you. Can you guess how many teams kept their second round pick in the last draft?

Did you say, “four?” That’s right, 26 of 30 teams traded those picks.

Now, a top 5 pick in the second round may have a little value. Not like it once did, when a team would stash the best Euro prospect with a second round pick and avoid paying salary (like we did to get Pek). Now the rules have changed and international scouting is thorough. Getting talent now requires a 1st (like we used to get Bolmaro). There have also been some decent players that have been found in those first few picks (which the WAS pick could be).

However, history shows that finding a starter in the second round is the exception. The majority make no significant contribution in the NBA. Hopefully Rosas can beat the odds, but keeping or giving up a pick shouldn’t be seen as a huge deal. This may be important if we try to move on from some more of our salary.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,724
And1: 22,288
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#163 » by Klomp » Sat Jul 31, 2021 10:22 pm

shrink wrote:People tend to over-value second round picks, and I’ve seen Star trades on the Trade Board fail to reach an agreement because posters refused to give up a second.

Here’s a fun fact for you. Can you guess how many teams kept their second round pick in the last draft?

Did you say, “four?” That’s right, 26 of 30 teams traded those picks.

Now, a top 5 pick in the second round may have a little value. Not like it once did, when a team would stash the best Euro prospect with a second round pick and avoid paying salary (like we did to get Pek). Now the rules have changed and international scouting is thorough. Getting talent now requires a 1st (like we used to get Bolmaro). There have also been some decent players that have been found in those first few picks (which the WAS pick could be).

However, history shows that finding a starter in the second round is the exception. The majority make no significant contribution in the NBA. Hopefully Rosas can beat the odds, but keeping or giving up a pick shouldn’t be seen as a huge deal. This may be important if we try to move on from some more of our salary.

While 26 teams traded away picks, it also means 26 teams traded FOR them too. By that logic, it makes them pretty valuable.

And I don't discount that they tend to be long shots, especially if you're only judging based on star quality. But there are still a number of really good players that can be found in the second round.

2019 produced quality role players like Cody Martin, Eric Paschall and Terrance Mann plus highly thought of prospects like Talen Horton Tucker, Bol Bol and Nic Claxton. 2018 produced DeAnthony Melton, Mitchell Robinson, Gary Trent Jr, Bruce Brown, Devonte Graham, Jalen Brunson and Jarred Vanderbilt. 2017 produced Dillon Brooks, Thomas Bryant and Monte Morris. 2016 gave us Malcolm Brogdon, Georges Niang, Jake Layman and Patrick McCaw.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,285
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#164 » by shrink » Sat Jul 31, 2021 10:37 pm

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:People tend to over-value second round picks, and I’ve seen Star trades on the Trade Board fail to reach an agreement because posters refused to give up a second.

Here’s a fun fact for you. Can you guess how many teams kept their second round pick in the last draft?

Did you say, “four?” That’s right, 26 of 30 teams traded those picks.

Now, a top 5 pick in the second round may have a little value. Not like it once did, when a team would stash the best Euro prospect with a second round pick and avoid paying salary (like we did to get Pek). Now the rules have changed and international scouting is thorough. Getting talent now requires a 1st (like we used to get Bolmaro). There have also been some decent players that have been found in those first few picks (which the WAS pick could be).

However, history shows that finding a starter in the second round is the exception. The majority make no significant contribution in the NBA. Hopefully Rosas can beat the odds, but keeping or giving up a pick shouldn’t be seen as a huge deal. This may be important if we try to move on from some more of our salary.

While 26 teams traded away picks, it also means 26 teams traded FOR them too. By that logic, it makes them pretty valuable.

And I don't discount that they tend to be long shots, especially if you're only judging based on star quality. But there are still a number of really good players that can be found in the second round.

2019 produced quality role players like Cody Martin, Eric Paschall and Terrance Mann plus highly thought of prospects like Talen Horton Tucker, Bol Bol and Nic Claxton. 2018 produced DeAnthony Melton, Mitchell Robinson, Gary Trent Jr, Bruce Brown, Devonte Graham, Jalen Brunson and Jarred Vanderbilt. 2017 produced Dillon Brooks, Thomas Bryant and Monte Morris. 2016 gave us Malcolm Brogdon, Georges Niang, Jake Layman and Patrick McCaw.

You’re right, but I think the over-value comes because the players that get remembered are the good ones. If there are five useful players in the second round, 25 teams didn’t get anything.

I recently had this discussion with Knicks fans, who were pumping up the value of their #58 pick. Here’s those names for 25 years.

2019 Miye Oni, Yale – Utah Jazz
2018 Thomas Welsh, UCLA – Denver Nuggets
2017 Ognjen Jaramaz, Serbia – New York Knicks
2016 Abdel Nader, Iowa State – Boston Celtics
2015 J.P. Tokoto, North Carolina – Philadelphia 76ers
2014 Jordan McRae, Tennessee – Philadelphia 76ers
2013 Deshaun Thomas, Ohio State – San Antonio Spurs
2012 Robbie Hummel, Purdue – Minnesota Timberwolves
2011 Ater Majok, The Sudan – L.A. Lakers
2010 Derrick Caracter, University of Texas at El Paso – L.A. Lakers

2009 Lester Hudson, University of Tennessee at Martin – Boston Celtics
2008 Joe Crawford, University of Kentucky – L.A. Lakers
2007 Giorgos Printezi, Greece – San Antonio Spurs
2006 J.R. Pinnock, George Washington University – Dallas Mavericks
2005 Uros Slokar, Slovenia – Toronto Raptors
2004 Blake Stepp, Gonzaga University – Minnesota Timberwolves
2003 Andreas Glyniadakis, Greece – Detroit Pistons
2002 Corsley Edwards, Central Connecticut State University – Sacramento Kings
2001 None
2000 Pete Mickeal, University of Cincinnati – Dallas Mavericks

1999 Eddie Lucas, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University – Utah Jazz
1998 Maceo Baston, University of Michigan – Chicago Bulls
1997 None
1996 Darnell Robinson, University of Arkansas – Dallas Mavericks
1995 Don Reid, Georgetown University – Detroit Pistons


Anyway, that’s #58, and the WAS pick should be better, but my point is, it’s still a low chance crapshoot. I’m happy to roll the dice, but teams shouldn’t pay a fortune to do it.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#165 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jul 31, 2021 11:18 pm

Neeva wrote:
Klomp wrote:Let me look at this trade from an angle that hasn't really been discussed.

Read on Twitter


While Dane brings up the pick's usefulness as ammo, I want to discuss the merit of having it and keeping it.

We were all disappointed about not having a pick on Thursday night. However, this wasn't a particularly deep draft and the Wolves don't necessarily have the roster spots to spare. Once Bolmaro signs his rookie scale deal, we will have 13 players under contract (plus two RFAs in Vanderbilt and McLaughlin). Whoever we added probably would've been a long shot to make the team.

Meanwhile, we added a second round pick next year when things really start to open up. Prince and Layman will be UFAs, Culver's 2022-23 option will likely be declined making him a UFA, Juancho is unguaranteed and Okogie is an RFA. While I know many are hoping most of those guys are gone this summer, it's still likely there will be more roster spots available, so having up to four picks in the draft could be super useful.


This years draft second round was bare bones but next years draft does not look all that better.


More like ammo to put another few million in Taylor's pocket.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#166 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jul 31, 2021 11:21 pm

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:People tend to over-value second round picks, and I’ve seen Star trades on the Trade Board fail to reach an agreement because posters refused to give up a second.

Here’s a fun fact for you. Can you guess how many teams kept their second round pick in the last draft?

Did you say, “four?” That’s right, 26 of 30 teams traded those picks.

Now, a top 5 pick in the second round may have a little value. Not like it once did, when a team would stash the best Euro prospect with a second round pick and avoid paying salary (like we did to get Pek). Now the rules have changed and international scouting is thorough. Getting talent now requires a 1st (like we used to get Bolmaro). There have also been some decent players that have been found in those first few picks (which the WAS pick could be).

However, history shows that finding a starter in the second round is the exception. The majority make no significant contribution in the NBA. Hopefully Rosas can beat the odds, but keeping or giving up a pick shouldn’t be seen as a huge deal. This may be important if we try to move on from some more of our salary.

While 26 teams traded away picks, it also means 26 teams traded FOR them too. By that logic, it makes them pretty valuable.

And I don't discount that they tend to be long shots, especially if you're only judging based on star quality. But there are still a number of really good players that can be found in the second round.

2019 produced quality role players like Cody Martin, Eric Paschall and Terrance Mann plus highly thought of prospects like Talen Horton Tucker, Bol Bol and Nic Claxton. 2018 produced DeAnthony Melton, Mitchell Robinson, Gary Trent Jr, Bruce Brown, Devonte Graham, Jalen Brunson and Jarred Vanderbilt. 2017 produced Dillon Brooks, Thomas Bryant and Monte Morris. 2016 gave us Malcolm Brogdon, Georges Niang, Jake Layman and Patrick McCaw.


:lol:
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,235
And1: 17,157
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#167 » by Calinks » Sun Aug 1, 2021 7:40 am

shrink wrote:
Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:People tend to over-value second round picks, and I’ve seen Star trades on the Trade Board fail to reach an agreement because posters refused to give up a second.

Here’s a fun fact for you. Can you guess how many teams kept their second round pick in the last draft?

Did you say, “four?” That’s right, 26 of 30 teams traded those picks.

Now, a top 5 pick in the second round may have a little value. Not like it once did, when a team would stash the best Euro prospect with a second round pick and avoid paying salary (like we did to get Pek). Now the rules have changed and international scouting is thorough. Getting talent now requires a 1st (like we used to get Bolmaro). There have also been some decent players that have been found in those first few picks (which the WAS pick could be).

However, history shows that finding a starter in the second round is the exception. The majority make no significant contribution in the NBA. Hopefully Rosas can beat the odds, but keeping or giving up a pick shouldn’t be seen as a huge deal. This may be important if we try to move on from some more of our salary.

While 26 teams traded away picks, it also means 26 teams traded FOR them too. By that logic, it makes them pretty valuable.

And I don't discount that they tend to be long shots, especially if you're only judging based on star quality. But there are still a number of really good players that can be found in the second round.

2019 produced quality role players like Cody Martin, Eric Paschall and Terrance Mann plus highly thought of prospects like Talen Horton Tucker, Bol Bol and Nic Claxton. 2018 produced DeAnthony Melton, Mitchell Robinson, Gary Trent Jr, Bruce Brown, Devonte Graham, Jalen Brunson and Jarred Vanderbilt. 2017 produced Dillon Brooks, Thomas Bryant and Monte Morris. 2016 gave us Malcolm Brogdon, Georges Niang, Jake Layman and Patrick McCaw.

You’re right, but I think the over-value comes because the players that get remembered are the good ones. If there are five useful players in the second round, 25 teams didn’t get anything.

I recently had this discussion with Knicks fans, who were pumping up the value of their #58 pick. Here’s those names for 25 years.

2019 Miye Oni, Yale – Utah Jazz
2018 Thomas Welsh, UCLA – Denver Nuggets
2017 Ognjen Jaramaz, Serbia – New York Knicks
2016 Abdel Nader, Iowa State – Boston Celtics
2015 J.P. Tokoto, North Carolina – Philadelphia 76ers
2014 Jordan McRae, Tennessee – Philadelphia 76ers
2013 Deshaun Thomas, Ohio State – San Antonio Spurs
2012 Robbie Hummel, Purdue – Minnesota Timberwolves
2011 Ater Majok, The Sudan – L.A. Lakers
2010 Derrick Caracter, University of Texas at El Paso – L.A. Lakers

2009 Lester Hudson, University of Tennessee at Martin – Boston Celtics
2008 Joe Crawford, University of Kentucky – L.A. Lakers
2007 Giorgos Printezi, Greece – San Antonio Spurs
2006 J.R. Pinnock, George Washington University – Dallas Mavericks
2005 Uros Slokar, Slovenia – Toronto Raptors
2004 Blake Stepp, Gonzaga University – Minnesota Timberwolves
2003 Andreas Glyniadakis, Greece – Detroit Pistons
2002 Corsley Edwards, Central Connecticut State University – Sacramento Kings
2001 None
2000 Pete Mickeal, University of Cincinnati – Dallas Mavericks

1999 Eddie Lucas, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University – Utah Jazz
1998 Maceo Baston, University of Michigan – Chicago Bulls
1997 None
1996 Darnell Robinson, University of Arkansas – Dallas Mavericks
1995 Don Reid, Georgetown University – Detroit Pistons


Anyway, that’s #58, and the WAS pick should be better, but my point is, it’s still a low chance crapshoot. I’m happy to roll the dice, but teams shouldn’t pay a fortune to do it.

Robbie Hummel might be the best player on that list :lol:
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,783
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#168 » by Nick K » Sun Aug 1, 2021 2:10 pm

Calinks wrote:
shrink wrote:
Klomp wrote:While 26 teams traded away picks, it also means 26 teams traded FOR them too. By that logic, it makes them pretty valuable.

And I don't discount that they tend to be long shots, especially if you're only judging based on star quality. But there are still a number of really good players that can be found in the second round.

2019 produced quality role players like Cody Martin, Eric Paschall and Terrance Mann plus highly thought of prospects like Talen Horton Tucker, Bol Bol and Nic Claxton. 2018 produced DeAnthony Melton, Mitchell Robinson, Gary Trent Jr, Bruce Brown, Devonte Graham, Jalen Brunson and Jarred Vanderbilt. 2017 produced Dillon Brooks, Thomas Bryant and Monte Morris. 2016 gave us Malcolm Brogdon, Georges Niang, Jake Layman and Patrick McCaw.

You’re right, but I think the over-value comes because the players that get remembered are the good ones. If there are five useful players in the second round, 25 teams didn’t get anything.

I recently had this discussion with Knicks fans, who were pumping up the value of their #58 pick. Here’s those names for 25 years.

2019 Miye Oni, Yale – Utah Jazz
2018 Thomas Welsh, UCLA – Denver Nuggets
2017 Ognjen Jaramaz, Serbia – New York Knicks
2016 Abdel Nader, Iowa State – Boston Celtics
2015 J.P. Tokoto, North Carolina – Philadelphia 76ers
2014 Jordan McRae, Tennessee – Philadelphia 76ers
2013 Deshaun Thomas, Ohio State – San Antonio Spurs
2012 Robbie Hummel, Purdue – Minnesota Timberwolves
2011 Ater Majok, The Sudan – L.A. Lakers
2010 Derrick Caracter, University of Texas at El Paso – L.A. Lakers

2009 Lester Hudson, University of Tennessee at Martin – Boston Celtics
2008 Joe Crawford, University of Kentucky – L.A. Lakers
2007 Giorgos Printezi, Greece – San Antonio Spurs
2006 J.R. Pinnock, George Washington University – Dallas Mavericks
2005 Uros Slokar, Slovenia – Toronto Raptors
2004 Blake Stepp, Gonzaga University – Minnesota Timberwolves
2003 Andreas Glyniadakis, Greece – Detroit Pistons
2002 Corsley Edwards, Central Connecticut State University – Sacramento Kings
2001 None
2000 Pete Mickeal, University of Cincinnati – Dallas Mavericks

1999 Eddie Lucas, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University – Utah Jazz
1998 Maceo Baston, University of Michigan – Chicago Bulls
1997 None
1996 Darnell Robinson, University of Arkansas – Dallas Mavericks
1995 Don Reid, Georgetown University – Detroit Pistons


Anyway, that’s #58, and the WAS pick should be better, but my point is, it’s still a low chance crapshoot. I’m happy to roll the dice, but teams shouldn’t pay a fortune to do it.

Robbie Hummel might be the best player on that list :lol:


He was! That is the lowest bar for good players I've ever seen.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,285
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#169 » by shrink » Tue Aug 3, 2021 2:05 pm

Rubio had 38 tonight against Team USA. I’m going to miss that guy.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,517
And1: 6,071
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#170 » by KGdaBom » Tue Aug 3, 2021 3:44 pm

shrink wrote:Rubio had 38 tonight against Team USA. I’m going to miss that guy.

Amazing. Who won?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,285
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#172 » by shrink » Tue Aug 3, 2021 3:47 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
shrink wrote:Rubio had 38 tonight against Team USA. I’m going to miss that guy.

Amazing. Who won?

It felt strange watching - it was the first time in my life that I kind of hoped an American team would get beat.
Folklore
Pro Prospect
Posts: 853
And1: 251
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
 

Re: [Krawczynski] Ricky Rubio for Taurean Price, 2022 second, and cash. 

Post#173 » by Folklore » Tue Aug 3, 2021 3:52 pm

shrink wrote:Rubio had 38 tonight against Team USA. I’m going to miss that guy.

I was never a fan of the Rubio trade but as of lately h grew on me. He became a mentor to our new long term star who definitely needs one (lost hos mother and grandmother and has a former tripper with a kid as a GF who is an inspiring rapper) and with Ed gone we are a team with no vets. I hated some o Rubio's decision making last season but I'd take Rubio's current play and contract over Dlo's. Like Thibs, and now Rosas, I don't understand the need to jump the gun on trading guys just to make room for a possible trade of agent signing.The odds of trading Ricky with his new play had way more value than sending him off or a player at a position not of need than to hold him to trade for one.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves