Post#1443 » by stuporman » Mon Aug 2, 2021 1:07 pm
aq_ua wrote:stuporman wrote:When the Knicks signed Randle there was a general consensus it was an ok deal apart from the opinion of his contribution to winning because that was in question.
After one year there was a general consensus it was a terrible deal which included the opinion his contribution to losing was without question.
After the past year there is a general consensus that it's a great deal which most have the opinion he contributes to winning.
So in conclusion....stfu and gtfo with the snap judgment prisoner of the moment hot takes...sure, you are welcome to have them but I'm not obligated to respect them just because you have them.
I’m going to disagree and say the consensus on Randle day one was that it was a desperate move and not at all
Ok. The rest of the post, fair points.
There definitely was an opinion of desperation in the signing because it was the summer of being star spurned.....again ....but the general opinion of the value Randle presented was ok, not great, not bad, just ok and sure...with the questions about his contributions to winning.
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job