RookieStar wrote:PrimeThyme wrote:RookieStar wrote:All I can say is.... the Bulls and Lakers are really trying to set back the clock in terms of gameplay.
The difference is the Lakers have two top 10 players to offset the shooting deficiencies. I can't say the same thing for the Bulls.
I kinda wanna argue they only have ONE (1) top-10 who is .. not really injury-prone but scary.. and that is AD. The rest are too old to be considered top-10 EVEN with LBJ. Because if you consider LBJ as top-10 then I can say that the LAkers have 5(five) top-10 not in their primes anymore in Dwight, Melo ,LBJ, AD with RW somewhere between top-15
I don't really understand anything you just wrote but I think it's a little silly to say LeBron isn't top 10 anymore. Obviously we've been waiting for father time to catch up to him for half a decade but I have a tough time, knowing what we know right now, taking that argument seriously.