SO_MONEY wrote:S&Ts are not the problem, far from it.
While not the whole problem, they're a big part of the problem with the current soft cap system, the soft cap is meant as a mechanism for teams to retain their own players, not endlessly inflate their payrolls as S/T's are currently being used.
We may not have any money, but say you are San Antonio or OKC who saved up their capspace like good little boys and girls.
They should control the market right? That's what the system is supposed to be set up for.
Have the pick of the litter for any player above the MLE?
Have the ability to leverage bargain deals and add 3-4 rotation players at the price of 2?
Have the ability to take on some teams disgruntled or slightly overpaid star player?
NOPE.
Sign and trades screw that up when any team with an expiring or 2 and draft picks (the junk bond of the NBA) becomes a bidder for free agents.
Free agency = supply and demand. The more bidders, the higher the price.
Sign and trades distort the market horribly and allow players too much leverage to maintain a healthy economic ecosystem.
















