Respectflly, none of the RFA's you just mentioned were either available (in hindsight) and/or moved the needle for this team in any meaningful way.Pooh_Jeter wrote:canz55 wrote:Which UFA did you want or thought the squad could use that we didn't end up getting because of our "poor asset management"?Pooh_Jeter wrote:
So one of the main selling points of the GTJ for Norm deal was GTJ's small cap hold which would allow the Raptors to be players in free agency.
There was no reason to deal Lowry for "pennies" on the dollar because worst case the Raptors would have cap flexibility if he walked
Now it's no big deal the Raptors are capped out and received fewer assets than they would have at the deadline because this FA class sucks?
Seems like this is just an attempt to justify poor asset management.
I'm not being sarcastic either, I really want to know.
Sent from my SM-G998W using RealGM mobile app
If Lowry left for nothing you are players for all the UFAs (Holmes, Norm, Fournier, THJ, Dinwiddie, etc.)
You also have room to work a S&T for Ball, Collins, Graham, Oubre, etc. If you had traded Lowry at the deadline you could have even used some of those assets in any potential S&T deal.
If you don't like ANY of these options and want to pivot into a full rebuild, suddenly you are available as a trade partner in all of these convoluted multi team trades or for teams looking to lessen their luxury tax bill.
I can understand maybe some people getting annoyed over losing out on Holmes but its fair to say that the Raps didn't want to give him the same amount of years that the Kings did. After that what you have leftover is a mixed bag of iffy players that don't configure in our long term plans.























