Liver_Pooty wrote:LofJ wrote:BigSlam wrote:Oubre is an UFA though?
DeRozan and Dinwiddie were UFAs too, both went to new teams via a sign and trade. GS at the very least wants a TPE, but we could send Oubre to another team as well. We'll find out one way or another pretty soon.
This is where I get confused and why the Kemba ordeal confused me a little as well (Boston getting a TPE). If a team can sign a player as a UFA why do a sign and trade and make sure the other team gets something, anything for him?
It's definitely situational, and obviously more common with RFAs. Looking at our recent deals with the Celtics though there are a couple different reasons.
Kemba to Boston: our cap sheet was such a mess that we basically had Kemba's Bird Rights and the MLE as far as options for PG, which is obviously a big pay gap. It's actually kind of fortunate that the Celtics also had a free agent guard in Rozier for us to bridge that salary difference. Rozier's first year salary was completely dependent upon Kemba's via base year compensation. For their trouble, Boston got a better 2nd round pick.
Hayward to Charlotte: Boston was hoping to send Hayward to a capped-out team for win-now assets, but when we came calling the best they could do was a trade exception for a player down the road (the conspiracy theorist in me notes Hayward's odd raise structure and the fact that it's set so that the TPE was just slightly too small to take in Beal). Charlotte called their bluff by stretching Batum so they didn't *need* to trade anything, thus putting it on Boston to make it work. So we got two future 2nds to accommodate them.
Then they used the TPE for half a season of Fournier.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk