EH15 wrote:Davion Mitchell is nothing like Lowry lol
If you actually watched any of his games he has the exact same offensive moves as Lowry.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
EH15 wrote:Davion Mitchell is nothing like Lowry lol
Badonkadonk wrote:They both look great.
Reeko wrote:simple_jack wrote:NinjaBro wrote:
Absolute blasphemy, the greatest Raptor of all time.
Yea that’s pretty dumb. Lowry still gets underrated.
Also please don’t put Draymond in that company. We still don’t know what Draymond looks like away from a team with the 2 greatest shooters of all time.
Like I've said before, having the two greatest shooters of all time didn't make Draymond a DPOY.
baller16 wrote:Suggs just looks like a winning player to me. He impacts the game on both ends and his shooting ability will only get better. The big question mark was his shot creation ability but I think he did pretty good on that end tonight.
If Barnes doesn't learn how to become a respectable shooter, then we really messed up. I ain't to worried yet though
WaltFrazier wrote:Just think. If we had drafted Suggs, there wouldn't be all this doubt and hand wringing about Barnes. There wouldn't be a season long debate shaping up. We'd be thrilled with our new Kyle replacement, and Barnes would be another 6'8 athlete. Who might not shine on the inferior Magic the way Suggs will.
PhilBlackson wrote:baller16 wrote:Suggs just looks like a winning player to me. He impacts the game on both ends and his shooting ability will only get better. The big question mark was his shot creation ability but I think he did pretty good on that end tonight.
If Barnes doesn't learn how to become a respectable shooter, then we really messed up. I ain't to worried yet though
Just trying to understand this rationale & narrative of what makes Suggs seem like a "winning player" (Barnes team won by double digits, Suggs by a single point that needed OT)....
The concern is if Barnes doesn't become a "respectable shooter"...I mean they shot within a couple percentage points of each other (neither were impressive) BUT Barnes is 6'9 and extremely long and has the ability add some post game as well this is also while Barnes had MORE rebounds, assists AND less turnovers...
It's funny how narratives are built, one guy apparently looks like a star and the other we have to worry about despite arguably having the better game overall.
Isn't that something?!
PhilBlackson wrote:baller16 wrote:Suggs just looks like a winning player to me. He impacts the game on both ends and his shooting ability will only get better. The big question mark was his shot creation ability but I think he did pretty good on that end tonight.
If Barnes doesn't learn how to become a respectable shooter, then we really messed up. I ain't to worried yet though
Just trying to understand this rationale & narrative of what makes Suggs seem like a "winning player" (Barnes team won by double digits, Suggs by a single point that needed OT)....
The concern is if Barnes doesn't become a "respectable shooter"...I mean they shot within a couple percentage points of each other (neither were impressive) BUT Barnes is 6'9 and extremely long and has the ability add some post game as well this is also while Barnes had MORE rebounds, assists AND less turnovers...
It's funny how narratives are built, one guy apparently looks like a star and the other we have to worry about despite arguably having the better game overall.
Isn't that something?!
OhCanada1091 wrote:I'm not too sure Suggs shines in Toronto the way he's going to shine in Orlando. He would join the Raptors as the 4th option at best behind OG, Siakam, Van Vleet.
Chandan wrote:PhilBlackson wrote:baller16 wrote:Suggs just looks like a winning player to me. He impacts the game on both ends and his shooting ability will only get better. The big question mark was his shot creation ability but I think he did pretty good on that end tonight.
If Barnes doesn't learn how to become a respectable shooter, then we really messed up. I ain't to worried yet though
Just trying to understand this rationale & narrative of what makes Suggs seem like a "winning player" (Barnes team won by double digits, Suggs by a single point that needed OT)....
The concern is if Barnes doesn't become a "respectable shooter"...I mean they shot within a couple percentage points of each other (neither were impressive) BUT Barnes is 6'9 and extremely long and has the ability add some post game as well this is also while Barnes had MORE rebounds, assists AND less turnovers...
It's funny how narratives are built, one guy apparently looks like a star and the other we have to worry about despite arguably having the better game overall.
Isn't that something?!
yeah it's weird, i'd much rather have 18/10/5 than 24/9/1 if we are strictly looking at stats.
i'd argue that having only 1 assist as a guard over 28:00 play time is sort of a flag.
NinjaBro wrote:OhCanada1091 wrote:I'm not too sure Suggs shines in Toronto the way he's going to shine in Orlando. He would join the Raptors as the 4th option at best behind OG, Siakam, Van Vleet.
I'm not even sure that would be the case. We've seen Siakam and Van Vleet as the first options and it's not pretty, unless you enjoy seeing Vanvleet pound the rock for 23 seconds and dish it out to OG for a hail mary.
Suggs easily fits in and gives us a more dynamic offensive threat that scores on 3 levels and makes all the winning plays like Lowry does. I could easily see him groomed to be our floor general, kid has star potential.
Raptors Realtor wrote:Hopefully it's not the Drummond/T-Ross debate all over again... However, my guess is this one will be magnified/debated way more.