ForeverTFC wrote:Pooh_Jeter wrote:Johnny Bball wrote:Such rubbish about Harden in here. He was a blue chip prospect expected to go top 5, went 3rd, and had better upside as a scorer than Suggs by any report, especially as an iso scorer and iso shooter. Just because he was 6th man on a stacked team before reaching his potential in Houston means nothing.
As for Curry, if everyone knew where the league was going with 3 point shooting,he would have gone way higher as he was one of the better pure shooting prospects ever. He was the leading college scorer, period and it was so far past where any of this years prospects were.
The league was still focused on bigs, and all you have to do is look at that draft and see how many were taken that were terrible.
And it's **** hilarious to spout off about Suggs work ethic while simultaneously ignoring the fact that its Barnes strength and one of the main reasons he was drafted higher. If you were drafting on work ethic alone you take Barnes or Mitchell.
Just so much trash revision of history.
You literally just contradicted your own argument.
The league is going smaller and towards shooting, yet the Raptors took a player who can't shoot and whose main selling point is his size/length.
If two players have great work ethic, but one player is already much more skilled and developed who would you take?
this is false. The league is getting bigger. Stagnation has happened at the 5 spot, but 1-4 is growing in height.
Unless I’m reading this wrong the increase in average height seems to be coming from the PG and SG positions, which would favor Suggs because he’s above average height for a PG.