NYG wrote:giberish wrote:Simmons is just such a horrible fit that it would be a mistake for GS to pay anywhere near full price for him. Philly obviously wouldn't be interested offer that GS should be limited to. Simmons should be dealt to a team that doesn't already have Draymond Green filling his role.
Couldn't Simmons check a lot of the boxes from the Shaun Livingston and Andre Iguodala roles, but just much, much better?
No.
First of all, Iguadola was at least a halfway competent 3-point shooter whereas Simmons won't even be guarded outside of 15 feet. Secondly, Draymond was a better shooter then than now, so the loss of shooting in the Iggy/Livingston spot will hurt more. And finally, the NBA has evolved so that shooting is even more important than it was in the Iggy/Livingston era.
I just don't think Simmons to Golden State makes any sense at all. It would only be helpful if Draymond was sent elsewhere, but Draymond isn't nearly as useful of a player if he is not paired with Curry - so nobody else will really value him on that contract.
One can argue that Golden State has the assets to get a guy like Simmons, but they don't have the need for Simmons, and Philly doesn't have the need for Wiseman. For a trade to go down, at least 2 other teams will have to be involved.