zarkoth wrote:What do you guys think of Marc Gasol as a backup center for Brook?
ew
htr wrote:Wes Mathews is still available as a fa, correct?
gross
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
zarkoth wrote:What do you guys think of Marc Gasol as a backup center for Brook?
htr wrote:Wes Mathews is still available as a fa, correct?
Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
theFireBlanket wrote:Matches Malone wrote:emunney wrote:
I think there are enough other inaccuracies on this page to discount the number assignments.
Whoever is responsible for updating the website on the backend is always slow to do it. You won't see updated anything until everyone has gotten a chance to take a new headshot during media day.
They're ahead compared to realgm forums on franchise logos.Just won a championship & it's still the logo from Kohl era...
ETA I see that this is widespread on RGM. Bobcats for the Hornets is probably worse.
Pachinko_ wrote:LuessiT wrote:ridetheskies wrote:Bucks have 25 games on ABC/ESPN/TNT. Lakers have 30.
I have no issues with that. Clippers having 27 grinds my gears.
Why? It's a free market based League, you make more money by showing teams in cities that have millions of basketball fans, there's nothing more to it. Who gives a crap? Let them make money.
humanrefutation wrote:ridetheskies wrote:Bucks have 25 games on ABC/ESPN/TNT. Lakers have 30.
I generally haven't enjoyed their national TV games. Doesn't have the same cachet of those early games on NBC back during the 2001 run. And Marv was terrible and Reggie was insufferable on those TNT games.
But it'll be interesting to see who takes over for Paschke, because that'll be a big factor in the enjoyment of BSWI games. I'm hoping LePay will take the bump from calling Badgers games.
LuessiT wrote:Pachinko_ wrote:LuessiT wrote:
I have no issues with that. Clippers having 27 grinds my gears.
Why? It's a free market based League, you make more money by showing teams in cities that have millions of basketball fans, there's nothing more to it. Who gives a crap? Let them make money.
I mean obviously I misunderstood the numbers but I was questioning wether a Kawhi-less Clippers team has more pull than the recent NBA champions.the Milwaukee Bucks. But this isn't the case. The GS numbers are a bit wierd cause to me they look like a mediocre team but the media/Vegas expects them to make a win now trade down the line.
trwi7 wrote:**** me deep, Giannis. ****. Me. Deep.
machu46 wrote:LuessiT wrote:Pachinko_ wrote:Why? It's a free market based League, you make more money by showing teams in cities that have millions of basketball fans, there's nothing more to it. Who gives a crap? Let them make money.
I mean obviously I misunderstood the numbers but I was questioning wether a Kawhi-less Clippers team has more pull than the recent NBA champions.the Milwaukee Bucks. But this isn't the case. The GS numbers are a bit wierd cause to me they look like a mediocre team but the media/Vegas expects them to make a win now trade down the line.
I don’t even think it’s a trade down the line. People just think the Warriors are a legit contender in the West with their current roster while also having the potential to make a significant upgrade. And on top of that, Curry drives ratings more than probably any other player in the NBA, so even if they weren’t a contender, they’d get a ton of national games.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

zarkoth wrote:What do you guys think of Marc Gasol as a backup center for Brook?
paulpressey25 wrote:zarkoth wrote:What do you guys think of Marc Gasol as a backup center for Brook?
I’m in. We should sign him simply to keep him off the market from other contenders if the Lakers release him.
He’s washed, but having mobile bigs who can shoot the 3 (Marc and Ibaka) are what cause us problems (2019 Raptors)
Pachinko_ wrote:machu46 wrote:LuessiT wrote:
I mean obviously I misunderstood the numbers but I was questioning wether a Kawhi-less Clippers team has more pull than the recent NBA champions.the Milwaukee Bucks. But this isn't the case. The GS numbers are a bit wierd cause to me they look like a mediocre team but the media/Vegas expects them to make a win now trade down the line.
I don’t even think it’s a trade down the line. People just think the Warriors are a legit contender in the West with their current roster while also having the potential to make a significant upgrade. And on top of that, Curry drives ratings more than probably any other player in the NBA, so even if they weren’t a contender, they’d get a ton of national games.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not even that complicated, SoCal simply has millions of basketball fans who are ready to click on links and watch advertisements and buy stuff. Basically what it comes down to. "Strength in numbers" LOL
Wisky4life wrote:We are sitting at....Do we make any other moves or can we even? I am open for a Diakite for Gasol move.
PG: Holiday........Hill
SG: DDV............Allen..........Hood
SF: Midds..........Conny..........Thanisis............Kalaitzakis
PF: Giannis........Ojeleye.......Nwora
C: Lopez...........Portis..........Diakite
2-way: Bryant (Probably) and Mamukelashvilli
Newz wrote:Bucks4Milwaukee wrote:Glad youre not in the front office. We will be contending next year if all stay healthy.