Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,940
And1: 1,345
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#581 » by DoItALL9 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:23 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:
stormi wrote:
This long winded copium of a response would only hold weight if the Spurs went on to get an actual good deal elsewhere. They got fleeced even worse by the Raptors.

Excessive draft capital? nope

Star potential prospect? nope

Near 30 year old empty stat merchant? yup

The return for a 26 year old with a ridiculous resume to that point including 2 DPOY's a (fraudulent) FMVP, multiple allstar berths and All NBA nods - that was the best player on two 60 win teams was... Poeltl, Demar and ONE PROTECTED frp. Just really really bad.

But also karma I guess for the way the organization and Tony Parker led that witch-hunt against a player that was genuinely battling injury crisis.

It's not Billy King levels of bad, but this one will go down as one of the worst trades of the modern era.


To complain that the Spurs didn't get a "good deal" is meaningless unless you're judging it against what was actually out there. I will elaborate on that in a second, but first let's look at the actual context that you completely ignore when describing Kawhi as an all-star, DPOY, etc.

Kawhi was dead-set on leaving to LA. In the lead-up to the season he had ceased all communication with the Spurs. When the Spurs sent doctors and officials to check on him his handlers literally ushered him into another room until they left and refused to let them speak with him. Kawhi then milked an injury to sit out until he was traded (more on that in a second). Kawhi's uncle Dennis during this time was leaking story after story about how Kawhi wanted a trade to the Lakers, while Kawhi continued to refuse to return calls to the Spurs front office. Kawhi and his uncle fired his previous agent (who is winning a lawsuit against them for owing him money) because he was not on board with the plan to force a trade. The lid was kept on all this because the Spurs front office doesn't let stuff out easily, and they have a very supportive local media. Kawhi was not more hurt in 2018 than he was on the Raptors and Clippers. The diagnosis the Spurs gave him, of a degenerative condition that he would need to load manage moving forward, was proven correct which is why both the Raptors and Clippers load managed him. Kawhi needed to go to 7 other doctors before he found one who would give him a different diagnosis, and that diagnosis has been proven wrong. Kawhi needs load managing moving forward, which the Spurs were happy to provide. They basically invented load management.

Kawhi refused to even work out with his team mates. He was killing it in private workouts, where it was obvious to all he could play, but refusing to let the Spurs either activate him for the roster, or rule him out for the season. His team mates, understandably annoyed, finally had a team meeting with him to ask him what was going on. During it Kawhi told them "I'll do anything for you guys, but not for this organisation". Kawhi then left the locker room, got on a plane, and flew to LA. That was the last time he was ever in San Antonio while under contract. He did not ask the teams permission to leave, he just left, and the Spurs had to roll with it. In the offseason Kawhi continued to refuse to meet the Spurs management, despite being under contract, and his uncle continued to leak his demands for a trade to LA. His Uncle had also made alot of other ridiculous demands, of much the same sort as the Raptors confirmed he had made before leaving in free agency (such as illegal shares in the team, jobs for all his family, etc, to even consider staying). Kawhi wanted us to pay J.Simmons $50 million dollars for eg, and to give his Uncle GM powers, during his time here (the first point should give you an idea of how bad the second idea would have been). Finally, the Spurs told him they were not even going to entertain a trade until he met with them. The meeting lasted less than 10 minutes, and Kawhi finally told them to their faces that he was set on a trade to LA.

So that's the context. Kawhi and his uncle were determined he would go to LA. He was willing to milk and injury to stay off the court to get said trade, and he refused to talk to non-LA teams. After Toronto traded for him they confirmed he hadn't agreed to talk to them, give them a medical, nothing. Understandably his value was extremely low, because of the above facts. He had to be treated as a rental for 27/29 of the other teams.

So what were the actual offers. Aside from the bad Lakers one I mentioned above, which never even got finalised because the Lakers weren't even negotiating seriously (so sure were they that Kawhi would go there for free in the offseason), here were the offers:
1) The 76ers offered Covington, Saric and the Heat pick. They explicitly refused to include Simmons, Embiid or even Fultz (which sounds ridiculous now, but should tell you where Kawhi's value was).
2) The Clippers offered Tobias Harris and one of their two late lotto picks. Rumour was the Clippers were "entertaining" offering the other one as well.
3) The Celtics by all sources "refused to include any of their 5 best players". Their offer was Marcus Smart (who the Spurs would have needed to pay the max to make the money work because of base year compensation issues), and "some picks". As Bontemps said "given the way the Celtics have carried themselves in this and recent negotiations, you can be pretty sure they weren't very good picks. If this had been an offer of J.Brown and the Kings pick obviously the Spur would have done it". It was speculated the best pick in the deal was the Memphis one. Blerg. The first thing Kawhi asked when he met the Lakers in free agency was "why didn't you trade for me", and Magic told him (and the media to whom he leaked it); cos we're not crazy. The Spurs wanted like 4 picks for you. So Magic himself is admitting there was no godfather offer.

That was it for serious offers. Bontemps was one of many objective journos who confirmed "they would have preferred OG or Pascal, but those guys weren't even on the table" (and this is before they even broke out the following seasons).

The Clippers deal isn't good. While SGA turned into a nice player, that's hindsight bias. The trade was not for SGA, it was for a late lotto pick that had no guarantee of being anything other than a run of the mill meh prospect. It's like us saying "well, we got Keldon, so the deal wasn't so bad". We got the 29th pick. We had no way of knowing it'd turn into Keldon. Harris we'd have lost that offseason, he was massively overpaid, and we wouldn't have been dumb enough to pay him that much. He's only an ok player.

The 76ers offer isn't good. We'd have gotten 1 good role player and a meh pick. The Celtics offer gave us a back-up guard, the position we least needed, on an overly rich contract, and some meh picks. Against that, the Raptors package, as flaws as it was, was actually the best option. Poeltl is a starting big who is fantastic on D. He's worth more than a late lotto pick. We got a 1st thrown in anyway, and we got DDR. I am DDR's harshest critic. I wanted him traded after the 2019 playoffs, but he has his uses and he achieved his purpose in the short term. He helped the team make the playoffs, tying the all-time playoff record, which was important to the Spurs franchise. If not for the Morris debacle in 2020, and White's injury in 2021, the Spurs would still be building that streak; but dem's the breaks. Sometimes the ball doesn't bounce your way. He still gave us a useful if frustrating player, and we managed to turn him into Thad and a good 1st. Overall that is better than anything else being offered; and no amount of waiting would have produced better offers, because Kawhi would just continue to sit with his phantom injury and leak how he wanted a trade to LA and the Spurs would have had another season disrupted by it.

Before Kawhi left to LA so many fans were chirping about how Kawhi would stay with Toronto and the Spurs had done him wrong. The Raptors won the title and treated him well, he would stay for sure. Raptors fans now realise he was never staying. Ever. And other teams weren't offering us much because they knew this too. The guy lost alot of money forcing his way to the Clippers and passing on the super max, etc.
They couldn't've waited and traded for Jimmy Butler?

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#582 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:30 am

Sportfan73 wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.

Ignoring all of the other pointless drama and discussion going on in the last few pages of this thread, why does everything compare the situation to AD, Kawhi, or Harden? Ben has 4 years left on his deal 4 FULL YEARS. He’s not not reporting, he’s not pouting or being a prima donna, he’s not holding out, if they don’t move him he’s coming to camp and he’s playing for the Philadelphia 76ers next year.

It's definitely a different situation because those guys are all vastly better players than Ben Simmons.
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#583 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:31 am

DoItALL9 wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:
stormi wrote:
This long winded copium of a response would only hold weight if the Spurs went on to get an actual good deal elsewhere. They got fleeced even worse by the Raptors.

Excessive draft capital? nope

Star potential prospect? nope

Near 30 year old empty stat merchant? yup

The return for a 26 year old with a ridiculous resume to that point including 2 DPOY's a (fraudulent) FMVP, multiple allstar berths and All NBA nods - that was the best player on two 60 win teams was... Poeltl, Demar and ONE PROTECTED frp. Just really really bad.

But also karma I guess for the way the organization and Tony Parker led that witch-hunt against a player that was genuinely battling injury crisis.

It's not Billy King levels of bad, but this one will go down as one of the worst trades of the modern era.


To complain that the Spurs didn't get a "good deal" is meaningless unless you're judging it against what was actually out there. I will elaborate on that in a second, but first let's look at the actual context that you completely ignore when describing Kawhi as an all-star, DPOY, etc.

Kawhi was dead-set on leaving to LA. In the lead-up to the season he had ceased all communication with the Spurs. When the Spurs sent doctors and officials to check on him his handlers literally ushered him into another room until they left and refused to let them speak with him. Kawhi then milked an injury to sit out until he was traded (more on that in a second). Kawhi's uncle Dennis during this time was leaking story after story about how Kawhi wanted a trade to the Lakers, while Kawhi continued to refuse to return calls to the Spurs front office. Kawhi and his uncle fired his previous agent (who is winning a lawsuit against them for owing him money) because he was not on board with the plan to force a trade. The lid was kept on all this because the Spurs front office doesn't let stuff out easily, and they have a very supportive local media. Kawhi was not more hurt in 2018 than he was on the Raptors and Clippers. The diagnosis the Spurs gave him, of a degenerative condition that he would need to load manage moving forward, was proven correct which is why both the Raptors and Clippers load managed him. Kawhi needed to go to 7 other doctors before he found one who would give him a different diagnosis, and that diagnosis has been proven wrong. Kawhi needs load managing moving forward, which the Spurs were happy to provide. They basically invented load management.

Kawhi refused to even work out with his team mates. He was killing it in private workouts, where it was obvious to all he could play, but refusing to let the Spurs either activate him for the roster, or rule him out for the season. His team mates, understandably annoyed, finally had a team meeting with him to ask him what was going on. During it Kawhi told them "I'll do anything for you guys, but not for this organisation". Kawhi then left the locker room, got on a plane, and flew to LA. That was the last time he was ever in San Antonio while under contract. He did not ask the teams permission to leave, he just left, and the Spurs had to roll with it. In the offseason Kawhi continued to refuse to meet the Spurs management, despite being under contract, and his uncle continued to leak his demands for a trade to LA. His Uncle had also made alot of other ridiculous demands, of much the same sort as the Raptors confirmed he had made before leaving in free agency (such as illegal shares in the team, jobs for all his family, etc, to even consider staying). Kawhi wanted us to pay J.Simmons $50 million dollars for eg, and to give his Uncle GM powers, during his time here (the first point should give you an idea of how bad the second idea would have been). Finally, the Spurs told him they were not even going to entertain a trade until he met with them. The meeting lasted less than 10 minutes, and Kawhi finally told them to their faces that he was set on a trade to LA.

So that's the context. Kawhi and his uncle were determined he would go to LA. He was willing to milk and injury to stay off the court to get said trade, and he refused to talk to non-LA teams. After Toronto traded for him they confirmed he hadn't agreed to talk to them, give them a medical, nothing. Understandably his value was extremely low, because of the above facts. He had to be treated as a rental for 27/29 of the other teams.

So what were the actual offers. Aside from the bad Lakers one I mentioned above, which never even got finalised because the Lakers weren't even negotiating seriously (so sure were they that Kawhi would go there for free in the offseason), here were the offers:
1) The 76ers offered Covington, Saric and the Heat pick. They explicitly refused to include Simmons, Embiid or even Fultz (which sounds ridiculous now, but should tell you where Kawhi's value was).
2) The Clippers offered Tobias Harris and one of their two late lotto picks. Rumour was the Clippers were "entertaining" offering the other one as well.
3) The Celtics by all sources "refused to include any of their 5 best players". Their offer was Marcus Smart (who the Spurs would have needed to pay the max to make the money work because of base year compensation issues), and "some picks". As Bontemps said "given the way the Celtics have carried themselves in this and recent negotiations, you can be pretty sure they weren't very good picks. If this had been an offer of J.Brown and the Kings pick obviously the Spur would have done it". It was speculated the best pick in the deal was the Memphis one. Blerg. The first thing Kawhi asked when he met the Lakers in free agency was "why didn't you trade for me", and Magic told him (and the media to whom he leaked it); cos we're not crazy. The Spurs wanted like 4 picks for you. So Magic himself is admitting there was no godfather offer.

That was it for serious offers. Bontemps was one of many objective journos who confirmed "they would have preferred OG or Pascal, but those guys weren't even on the table" (and this is before they even broke out the following seasons).

The Clippers deal isn't good. While SGA turned into a nice player, that's hindsight bias. The trade was not for SGA, it was for a late lotto pick that had no guarantee of being anything other than a run of the mill meh prospect. It's like us saying "well, we got Keldon, so the deal wasn't so bad". We got the 29th pick. We had no way of knowing it'd turn into Keldon. Harris we'd have lost that offseason, he was massively overpaid, and we wouldn't have been dumb enough to pay him that much. He's only an ok player.

The 76ers offer isn't good. We'd have gotten 1 good role player and a meh pick. The Celtics offer gave us a back-up guard, the position we least needed, on an overly rich contract, and some meh picks. Against that, the Raptors package, as flaws as it was, was actually the best option. Poeltl is a starting big who is fantastic on D. He's worth more than a late lotto pick. We got a 1st thrown in anyway, and we got DDR. I am DDR's harshest critic. I wanted him traded after the 2019 playoffs, but he has his uses and he achieved his purpose in the short term. He helped the team make the playoffs, tying the all-time playoff record, which was important to the Spurs franchise. If not for the Morris debacle in 2020, and White's injury in 2021, the Spurs would still be building that streak; but dem's the breaks. Sometimes the ball doesn't bounce your way. He still gave us a useful if frustrating player, and we managed to turn him into Thad and a good 1st. Overall that is better than anything else being offered; and no amount of waiting would have produced better offers, because Kawhi would just continue to sit with his phantom injury and leak how he wanted a trade to LA and the Spurs would have had another season disrupted by it.

Before Kawhi left to LA so many fans were chirping about how Kawhi would stay with Toronto and the Spurs had done him wrong. The Raptors won the title and treated him well, he would stay for sure. Raptors fans now realise he was never staying. Ever. And other teams weren't offering us much because they knew this too. The guy lost alot of money forcing his way to the Clippers and passing on the super max, etc.
They couldn't've waited and traded for Jimmy Butler?

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app

You get the Spurs can't see the future right? I also don't think anyone would have traded them Butler, knowing Kawhi was almost certainly a rental.
DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,940
And1: 1,345
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#584 » by DoItALL9 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:38 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:
DoItALL9 wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:
To complain that the Spurs didn't get a "good deal" is meaningless unless you're judging it against what was actually out there. I will elaborate on that in a second, but first let's look at the actual context that you completely ignore when describing Kawhi as an all-star, DPOY, etc.

Kawhi was dead-set on leaving to LA. In the lead-up to the season he had ceased all communication with the Spurs. When the Spurs sent doctors and officials to check on him his handlers literally ushered him into another room until they left and refused to let them speak with him. Kawhi then milked an injury to sit out until he was traded (more on that in a second). Kawhi's uncle Dennis during this time was leaking story after story about how Kawhi wanted a trade to the Lakers, while Kawhi continued to refuse to return calls to the Spurs front office. Kawhi and his uncle fired his previous agent (who is winning a lawsuit against them for owing him money) because he was not on board with the plan to force a trade. The lid was kept on all this because the Spurs front office doesn't let stuff out easily, and they have a very supportive local media. Kawhi was not more hurt in 2018 than he was on the Raptors and Clippers. The diagnosis the Spurs gave him, of a degenerative condition that he would need to load manage moving forward, was proven correct which is why both the Raptors and Clippers load managed him. Kawhi needed to go to 7 other doctors before he found one who would give him a different diagnosis, and that diagnosis has been proven wrong. Kawhi needs load managing moving forward, which the Spurs were happy to provide. They basically invented load management.

Kawhi refused to even work out with his team mates. He was killing it in private workouts, where it was obvious to all he could play, but refusing to let the Spurs either activate him for the roster, or rule him out for the season. His team mates, understandably annoyed, finally had a team meeting with him to ask him what was going on. During it Kawhi told them "I'll do anything for you guys, but not for this organisation". Kawhi then left the locker room, got on a plane, and flew to LA. That was the last time he was ever in San Antonio while under contract. He did not ask the teams permission to leave, he just left, and the Spurs had to roll with it. In the offseason Kawhi continued to refuse to meet the Spurs management, despite being under contract, and his uncle continued to leak his demands for a trade to LA. His Uncle had also made alot of other ridiculous demands, of much the same sort as the Raptors confirmed he had made before leaving in free agency (such as illegal shares in the team, jobs for all his family, etc, to even consider staying). Kawhi wanted us to pay J.Simmons $50 million dollars for eg, and to give his Uncle GM powers, during his time here (the first point should give you an idea of how bad the second idea would have been). Finally, the Spurs told him they were not even going to entertain a trade until he met with them. The meeting lasted less than 10 minutes, and Kawhi finally told them to their faces that he was set on a trade to LA.

So that's the context. Kawhi and his uncle were determined he would go to LA. He was willing to milk and injury to stay off the court to get said trade, and he refused to talk to non-LA teams. After Toronto traded for him they confirmed he hadn't agreed to talk to them, give them a medical, nothing. Understandably his value was extremely low, because of the above facts. He had to be treated as a rental for 27/29 of the other teams.

So what were the actual offers. Aside from the bad Lakers one I mentioned above, which never even got finalised because the Lakers weren't even negotiating seriously (so sure were they that Kawhi would go there for free in the offseason), here were the offers:
1) The 76ers offered Covington, Saric and the Heat pick. They explicitly refused to include Simmons, Embiid or even Fultz (which sounds ridiculous now, but should tell you where Kawhi's value was).
2) The Clippers offered Tobias Harris and one of their two late lotto picks. Rumour was the Clippers were "entertaining" offering the other one as well.
3) The Celtics by all sources "refused to include any of their 5 best players". Their offer was Marcus Smart (who the Spurs would have needed to pay the max to make the money work because of base year compensation issues), and "some picks". As Bontemps said "given the way the Celtics have carried themselves in this and recent negotiations, you can be pretty sure they weren't very good picks. If this had been an offer of J.Brown and the Kings pick obviously the Spur would have done it". It was speculated the best pick in the deal was the Memphis one. Blerg. The first thing Kawhi asked when he met the Lakers in free agency was "why didn't you trade for me", and Magic told him (and the media to whom he leaked it); cos we're not crazy. The Spurs wanted like 4 picks for you. So Magic himself is admitting there was no godfather offer.

That was it for serious offers. Bontemps was one of many objective journos who confirmed "they would have preferred OG or Pascal, but those guys weren't even on the table" (and this is before they even broke out the following seasons).

The Clippers deal isn't good. While SGA turned into a nice player, that's hindsight bias. The trade was not for SGA, it was for a late lotto pick that had no guarantee of being anything other than a run of the mill meh prospect. It's like us saying "well, we got Keldon, so the deal wasn't so bad". We got the 29th pick. We had no way of knowing it'd turn into Keldon. Harris we'd have lost that offseason, he was massively overpaid, and we wouldn't have been dumb enough to pay him that much. He's only an ok player.

The 76ers offer isn't good. We'd have gotten 1 good role player and a meh pick. The Celtics offer gave us a back-up guard, the position we least needed, on an overly rich contract, and some meh picks. Against that, the Raptors package, as flaws as it was, was actually the best option. Poeltl is a starting big who is fantastic on D. He's worth more than a late lotto pick. We got a 1st thrown in anyway, and we got DDR. I am DDR's harshest critic. I wanted him traded after the 2019 playoffs, but he has his uses and he achieved his purpose in the short term. He helped the team make the playoffs, tying the all-time playoff record, which was important to the Spurs franchise. If not for the Morris debacle in 2020, and White's injury in 2021, the Spurs would still be building that streak; but dem's the breaks. Sometimes the ball doesn't bounce your way. He still gave us a useful if frustrating player, and we managed to turn him into Thad and a good 1st. Overall that is better than anything else being offered; and no amount of waiting would have produced better offers, because Kawhi would just continue to sit with his phantom injury and leak how he wanted a trade to LA and the Spurs would have had another season disrupted by it.

Before Kawhi left to LA so many fans were chirping about how Kawhi would stay with Toronto and the Spurs had done him wrong. The Raptors won the title and treated him well, he would stay for sure. Raptors fans now realise he was never staying. Ever. And other teams weren't offering us much because they knew this too. The guy lost alot of money forcing his way to the Clippers and passing on the super max, etc.
They couldn't've waited and traded for Jimmy Butler?

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app

You get the Spurs can't see the future right? I also don't think anyone would have traded them Butler, knowing Kawhi was almost certainly a rental.
If the Toronto return was the best at the time and it was considered bad even in San another then they could've waited for something better.

Similarly, if Philly thinks McCollum is a bad return for Simmons right now they can wait until something else becomes available.

They didn't need to rush.

You're right Kawhi was likely to only be a rental.

Compare rental Kawhi to what they ACTUALLY got for Jimmy Butler
"Traded by the Minnesota Timberwolves with Justin Patton to the Philadelphia 76ers for Jerryd Bayless, Robert Covington, Dario Šarić and a 2022 2nd round draft pick."

Hopefully the pick, if they still have it, is the next Draymond Green.

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#585 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:54 am

DoItALL9 wrote:If the Toronto return was the best at the time and it was considered bad even in San another then they could've waited for something better.

Similarly, if Philly thinks McCollum is a bad return for Simmons right now they can wait until something else becomes available.

They didn't need to rush.

You're right Kawhi was likely to only be a rental.

Compare rental Kawhi to what they ACTUALLY got for Jimmy Butler
"Traded by the Minnesota Timberwolves with Justin Patton to the Philadelphia 76ers for Jerryd Bayless, Robert Covington, Dario Šarić and a 2022 2nd round draft pick."

Hopefully the pick, if they still have it, is the next Draymond Green.

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app


This isn't even hindsight bias, it is a failure to understand the situation. Kawhi had 1 year left on his deal. He had just sat out the whole year with an essentially fake injury. He had left the team without permission, and was refusing to return their calls. He was giving every indication he would continue to sit out with a fake injury and to sabotage the team. To talk of waiting is ridiculous. The closer you get to the end of his contract, the less value he has. The Spurs couldn't let Kawhi ruin another season by sitting out and being a cancerous distraction, then lose him for nothing. That's the first thing.

The next thing is you not understanding the motives behind these trades. The Wolves traded for those guys as future building blocks (or that was the plan). They wouldn't trade as much for Kawhi because they know he is leaving after a year. He's a rental. Covington and Saris were supposed to be long term guys. The other 2 factors are: 1) The Spurs can't see the future, they don't know Butler is going to sabotage his team like Kawhi until they move him, and 2) The Spurs are not a place Butler is likely to stay either. He bailed on Philly, a big market, after they were a crazy shot away from maybe winning a title. Butler is a wierd guy. I think he was going to go to Miami or some such place regardless of what the 76ers did, and certainly I don't see him agreeing to stay in San Antonio.

The final thing is the Wolves trade of Butler was widely panned at the time as terrible. You can't hang on to a toxic situation with his final year ticking away and just hope a team will make a ridiculously stupid trade. The Spurs had canvassed the league far and wide. The trades I mentioned were all they could come up with. Even the Kings were not interested, despite the Spurs trying to get the #2 pick for him, and this is a Kings front office who was so dumb they passed on Doncic for Bagley. If the Spurs had 4 years left on Kawhi's deal like Simmons I'd be right there with you; let's get uncomfortable until we get the right deal. It was 1 year to go.
cool93
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
 

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#586 » by cool93 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 5:56 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.


It's not about fair value lol, SAS would have nothing to offer if not for the circumstances. Still trading him for the worse version of himself and meh prospect is ridiculous even now.
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#587 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 6:00 am

cool93 wrote:
DWhiteMamba wrote:Well they're getting some ok picks too. Lonny Walker is still a very good prospect. He could easily turn the corner this year, and Dejounte could shoot better, and then this trade looks terrible for the Spurs.

Also why on earth are we discussing this like the 76ers are getting fair value. Simmons has shown he's every bit the prima donna Kawhi was. When the season starts he'll come in and be a cancer until they move him. Harden gave us a good lesson in how to do that for Houston just last year too. You're not getting fair value, no more than the Spurs got for Kawhi. You're getting the best package you can get.


It's not about fair value lol, SAS would have nothing to offer if not for the circumstances. Still trading him for the worse version of himself and meh prospect is ridiculous even now.


Cool. Don't trade for him. I don't even want Simmons. I just lived through 3 years of a fake star who can't shoot clogging up our offense. I'm ready to move on from that experience thanks. I'm just explaining what is fair for San Antonio. If you're not interested that's cool. Keep trying to swindle the Wolves or something.
DoItALL9
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,940
And1: 1,345
Joined: Oct 08, 2016
       

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#588 » by DoItALL9 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 6:26 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:
DoItALL9 wrote:If the Toronto return was the best at the time and it was considered bad even in San another then they could've waited for something better.

Similarly, if Philly thinks McCollum is a bad return for Simmons right now they can wait until something else becomes available.

They didn't need to rush.

You're right Kawhi was likely to only be a rental.

Compare rental Kawhi to what they ACTUALLY got for Jimmy Butler
"Traded by the Minnesota Timberwolves with Justin Patton to the Philadelphia 76ers for Jerryd Bayless, Robert Covington, Dario Šarić and a 2022 2nd round draft pick."

Hopefully the pick, if they still have it, is the next Draymond Green.

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app


This isn't even hindsight bias, it is a failure to understand the situation. Kawhi had 1 year left on his deal. He had just sat out the whole year with an essentially fake injury. He had left the team without permission, and was refusing to return their calls. He was giving every indication he would continue to sit out with a fake injury and to sabotage the team. To talk of waiting is ridiculous. The closer you get to the end of his contract, the less value he has. The Spurs couldn't let Kawhi ruin another season by sitting out and being a cancerous distraction, then lose him for nothing. That's the first thing.

The next thing is you not understanding the motives behind these trades. The Wolves traded for those guys as future building blocks (or that was the plan). They wouldn't trade as much for Kawhi because they know he is leaving after a year. He's a rental. Covington and Saris were supposed to be long term guys. The other 2 factors are: 1) The Spurs can't see the future, they don't know Butler is going to sabotage his team like Kawhi until they move him, and 2) The Spurs are not a place Butler is likely to stay either. He bailed on Philly, a big market, after they were a crazy shot away from maybe winning a title. Butler is a wierd guy. I think he was going to go to Miami or some such place regardless of what the 76ers did, and certainly I don't see him agreeing to stay in San Antonio.

The final thing is the Wolves trade of Butler was widely panned at the time as terrible. You can't hang on to a toxic situation with his final year ticking away and just hope a team will make a ridiculously stupid trade. The Spurs had canvassed the league far and wide. The trades I mentioned were all they could come up with. Even the Kings were not interested, despite the Spurs trying to get the #2 pick for him, and this is a Kings front office who was so dumb they passed on Doncic for Bagley. If the Spurs had 4 years left on Kawhi's deal like Simmons I'd be right there with you; let's get uncomfortable until we get the right deal. It was 1 year to go.
You're convinced Sam Antonio did the best they could. That's fine.

Jimmy Butler's unhappiness was noted during the summer. He wanted a maximum deal which Minnesota wasn't looking to give him. He is also big on a franchise's culture. San Antonio could've provided what he was looking for imo.

I've never known him to say anything about market size being a determining factor for him. He left Philly, a major market, for Miami, a small market.

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#589 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 6:48 am

DoItALL9 wrote:You're convinced Sam Antonio did the best they could. That's fine.

Jimmy Butler's unhappiness was noted during the summer. He wanted a maximum deal which Minnesota wasn't looking to give him. He is also big on a franchise's culture. San Antonio could've provided what he was looking for imo.

I've never known him to say anything about market size being a determining factor for him. He left Philly, a major market, for Miami, a small market.

Sent from my LM-G710 using RealGM mobile app


The Butler unhappiness came out of nowhere, and really didn't seem to make logical sense. The first official report of him wanting a trade came in late September that year, literally in training camp, with Butler having given a list of 3 teams he would accept a trade to: the Knicks, Nets and Clippers. That kind of belies the idea Butler was not interested in a better market, in fact between his list, and the team/s he ended up with, it's clear the market was important to him. The actual trade didn't happen until mid November. The Spurs would have been grossly irresponsible to potentially punt the season and watch Kawhi's trade value drop with each day on the mere hope something crazy like this would happen.

What did happen with Butler? To this day nobody really knows. Butler claimed he was unhappy the team wasn't renegotiating and extending his contract, which was the only way they could have extended him as he wanted, but that wasn't even possible and his agent knew that when J.Butler was traded there. The Wolves had no cap to do it. So that complaint, while leaked in the media repeatedly and appealing to the less informed, was silly. The Wolves were giving every indication they were going to pay him once they were able to do so under the rules, and that contract obviously was going to be the max. The Wolves had just had their first playoff appearance in forever. Butler was gonna get paid.

Butler was apparently unhappy with other Wolves who had been paid already, but that had already been done before he got there too so what is the point of complaining about it? It was also suggested he didn't think the team was good enough... but if he felt that way about the Wolves, he couldn't have thought moving to the Spurs was going to be a big step up. The Spurs young guys hadn't shown anything yet, their vets were getting older, and Green would have needed to go in the Wolves trade too for cap matching same as the DDR one. You think Butler wants to stay on a Spurs team if Kawhi is going the other direction? I quite liked the Spurs young talent and support pieces all things considered, and they'd tried to get gys like CP3, Iggy, KD, Lebron, Reddick, etc. Guys just weren't interested in playing in SA. However if Butler doesn't want to play with Towns, who was alot sexier than than most players around the NBA at that time, is he really going to be wowed by what the Spurs had? It just seems like he wanted a bigger market and more respect/to be the man there. The Spurs could only maybe offer the latter.

Butler then went to Philly where he again complained about being disrespected, etc, and got into a beef with Simmons and the coaching staff, including Brett Brown who for his faults is one of the nicest guys in the NBA. I just don't have any confidence Butler would have stayed in SA, even Philly didn't think he was re-signing (though they weren't totally sure they wanted him back either, which was a mistake on their part).

But that is just the issues from the Butler side of things. The bigger problem is I don't think the Wolves would have had any interest in moving Butler for Kawhi, knowing Kawhi was almost certainly leaving in a year. Nor do I think the Spurs would have been responsible to go into the year hoping something unexpected like that was going to happen.

I can only comment on how the Toronto one compares to trades that were realistically reported to be available. Compared to those it was fine.
Tomjas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 3,174
Joined: Nov 04, 2017

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#590 » by Tomjas » Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:06 am

Vegas forecasts Spurs to be one of the worst teams in nba next season and it’s hardly surprising as current roster is completely dysfunctional and set up for additional moves

Doc/organisation won’t tank so they will be in for Simmons big time

Try to keep White as he’s a microwave scorer and push picks out a few years as they will lose value as team improves
DWhiteMamba
Junior
Posts: 482
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 21, 2021

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#591 » by DWhiteMamba » Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:11 am

I'd be hitting that over for the Spurs like crazy. It's already jumped 2 wins in the last week. I expect it'll jump at least a few more before training camp. Losing DDR doesn't hurt the Spurs much if at all. With a healthy White we'll be better, not worse. We have more depth now too.
Tomjas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 3,174
Joined: Nov 04, 2017

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#592 » by Tomjas » Sun Aug 22, 2021 7:17 am

DWhiteMamba wrote:I'd be hitting that over for the Spurs like crazy. It's already jumped 2 wins in the last week. I expect it'll jump at least a few more before training camp. Losing DDR doesn't hurt the Spurs much if at all. With a healthy White we'll be better, not worse. We have more depth now too.


Spurs will be bad

I like the organisation & am a big admirer of Pop but they’re not good right now
uriah
Sophomore
Posts: 145
And1: 41
Joined: Nov 25, 2005

PHI - MEM 

Post#593 » by uriah » Sun Aug 22, 2021 10:24 am

Ben Simmons

for

Dillon Brooks + Kyle Anderson + Rajon Rondo (or Tyus Jones)

Why for philly ?. Philly moves off from Simmons revamping their starting lineup withou losing their defensive identity. All Anderson, Brooks and Rondo are all really good defenders, solid scorers and above average playmakers. The only doubt would be the starting PG spot that should be shared between Rondo/Milton /Maxey/Curry.

R. Rondo / D.Brooks / K.Anderson / T.Harris / J. Embiid
(S.Milton) / (S.Curry) / (D.Green) / (M.Scott) / (A.Drummond)


Why for Memphis ?. Grizzlies bet on Simmons to form a premium playmaking duo with Morant. Shooting in the starting lineup would be a big hole so Bane should step up at the SG spot.

J. Morant / D.Bane / B.Simmons / JJackson Jr / S. Adams
(T. Jones) / (D.Melton / (Z.Williams) / (B. Clarke) / (X. Tillman)
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,773
And1: 44,034
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: PHI - MEM 

Post#594 » by zimpy27 » Sun Aug 22, 2021 10:53 am

Simmons would be worth Anderson, Melton, Brooks as a start I think
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
Lovetron Joe
Rookie
Posts: 1,157
And1: 488
Joined: Dec 26, 2014
       

Re: PHI - MEM 

Post#595 » by Lovetron Joe » Sun Aug 22, 2021 11:10 am

Do not see Philly trading Simmons for three lesser players.
uriah
Sophomore
Posts: 145
And1: 41
Joined: Nov 25, 2005

Re: PHI - MEM 

Post#596 » by uriah » Sun Aug 22, 2021 11:37 am

Lovetron Joe wrote:Do not see Philly trading Simmons for three lesser players.


Maybe lesser players, but a disgrunted Simmons is losing value each second and Brooks + Anderson + Rondo is 2 + 1/2 starters for Philly... I see a better starting lineup for them with Curry/Milton/Rondo + Brooks + Anderson + Harris + Embiid...
GutUNC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,895
And1: 2,076
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
         

Re: PHI - MEM 

Post#597 » by GutUNC » Sun Aug 22, 2021 12:13 pm

uriah wrote:
Lovetron Joe wrote:Do not see Philly trading Simmons for three lesser players.


Maybe lesser players, but a disgrunted Simmons is losing value each second and Brooks + Anderson + Rondo is 2 + 1/2 starters for Philly... I see a better starting lineup for them with Curry/Milton/Rondo + Brooks + Anderson + Harris + Embiid...


So we can put this on the pile of "yeah, I know this isn't good value but you have to deal him and you have to deal him to *my* team because reasons so here's some guys we don't need" offers then?

I'd honestly like to send a check to the mods for the containment thread.
GDTBATH
kuclas
General Manager
Posts: 7,757
And1: 3,971
Joined: Nov 08, 2016
     

Re: Ben Simmons Containment Thread Take 3 

Post#598 » by kuclas » Sun Aug 22, 2021 12:32 pm

With Jimmy butler it was 100% Always about the max max money guarantee. It’s a pride thing with jimmy. He wants respect. The only way to get respect from jimmy is to pay the man.

It’s no secret Minnesota giving Wiggins the max extension pissed butler off. Especially with Wiggins play and lack of passion.

Than Sixers. I truly believe due to butler age (turning 30 in sept 2019). During the free agent period. Sixers did not initially offer butler the full 5 year/190 max. Look at woj reports. They didn’t want to be paying a 34 year old butler max money for a 5th year.

The lack of 5th year max was a sign of disrespect from Jimmy. That set him off. Now I’m sure other reports said Sixers offer the max. But I truly believe woj initial report there was no true guarantee 5/190 max no gimmicks offered initially. Maybe they scrambled after they found out he decided to go to Miami than offered it to him.

Than every thing go out of control with lack of real GM (Elton brand Brett brown) scramble and over paid Harris almost the full max 5/180 than the al Horford over pay (with partial guarantee 4th year)

Considering the Horford partial guarantee stipulations. I have no doubt Sixers tried to do the same to butler (partial guarantee fifth season). I do not think the initial offer was a fully guarantee 5 year max.
kuclas
General Manager
Posts: 7,757
And1: 3,971
Joined: Nov 08, 2016
     

Re: PHI - MEM 

Post#599 » by kuclas » Sun Aug 22, 2021 12:38 pm

uriah wrote:
Lovetron Joe wrote:Do not see Philly trading Simmons for three lesser players.


Maybe lesser players, but a disgrunted Simmons is losing value each second and Brooks + Anderson + Rondo is 2 + 1/2 starters for Philly... I see a better starting lineup for them with Curry/Milton/Rondo + Brooks + Anderson + Harris + Embiid...

Just stop. The only person losing value each time is Simmons bank account if he wants to be disgruntled and sit out

Teams are tying to off load their junk role players and Sixers would still have a glaring hole (iso half court creator). So trading Simmons isn’t the issue. It’s the returning players they are getting back aren’t exactly helping them. Brooks Anderson rondo are not consistent threats from outside and none of them are elite (rondo is not elite anymore) at breaking down a defense in half court. Sixers need a number 1 iso guy to help out a tiring Embiid down the stretch.
uriah
Sophomore
Posts: 145
And1: 41
Joined: Nov 25, 2005

Re: PHI - MEM 

Post#600 » by uriah » Sun Aug 22, 2021 12:44 pm

GutUNC wrote:
uriah wrote:
Lovetron Joe wrote:Do not see Philly trading Simmons for three lesser players.


Maybe lesser players, but a disgrunted Simmons is losing value each second and Brooks + Anderson + Rondo is 2 + 1/2 starters for Philly... I see a better starting lineup for them with Curry/Milton/Rondo + Brooks + Anderson + Harris + Embiid...


So we can put this on the pile of "yeah, I know this isn't good value but you have to deal him and you have to deal him to *my* team because reasons so here's some guys we don't need" offers then?

I'd honestly like to send a check to the mods for the containment thread.


Guys Memphis doesn't need ? Brooks and Anderson are two starters for Memphis and would also be for Philadelphia. We can argue that Philly might would like to wait until mid season or hope that Simmons turns the situation around, or even hope for a Dame/Beal deal, but I feel that the value is not that far off and Philly would be better with Anderson /Brooks in the starting lineup.

For Memphis is not a clear home run in any case, Ja+Simmons+Adams are all questionable shooters and the bet would be for Simmons to fill Valanciunas rebounding numbers while aligning with JJJ and the other young players timeline.

Return to Trades and Transactions