Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,564
- And1: 1,399
- Joined: Mar 08, 2015
-
Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
In the last decade, what are the top three teams that SHOULD have won a championship based on talent alone- but didn’t.
Here’s what I think
1) 2019 -76ers (dude. They literally had four all stars and a bunch of quality players ontop of that...)
2) 2018- rockets ... this was a GREAT team.
3) 2013 lakers?
4) 2020 clippers?
What do you think?
Here’s what I think
1) 2019 -76ers (dude. They literally had four all stars and a bunch of quality players ontop of that...)
2) 2018- rockets ... this was a GREAT team.
3) 2013 lakers?
4) 2020 clippers?
What do you think?
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
- GregOden
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,522
- And1: 2,605
- Joined: Aug 11, 2010
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
2019 Warriors
2011 Heat
2015 Cavs
2011 Heat
2015 Cavs
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
- BenoUdrihFTL
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,701
- And1: 23,489
- Joined: Feb 20, 2013
- Location: Papa John's
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
2022 Nets
1.61803398874989484820458683436563811772030917980576286
2135448622705260462818902449707207
204189391137484754088
0753868917521
26633862
22353
693
2135448622705260462818902449707207
204189391137484754088
0753868917521
26633862
22353
693
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,356
- And1: 654
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
2000 Blazers
ADawg22 wrote:Cavs announcer sounds like he has an orgasm everytime one of their players score.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,953
- And1: 1,565
- Joined: Nov 22, 2015
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
2018 Rockets but they got injured.
2016 Warriors but they choked.
2016 Warriors but they choked.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,953
- And1: 1,565
- Joined: Nov 22, 2015
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
DS17 wrote:In the last decade, what are the top three teams that SHOULD have won a championship based on talent alone- but didn’t.
Here’s what I think
1) 2019 -76ers (dude. They literally had four all stars and a bunch of quality players ontop of that...)
2) 2018- rockets ... this was a GREAT team.
3) 2013 lakers?
4) 2020 clippers?
What do you think?
2018 Rockets but they got injured.
2016 Warriors but they choked.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
- Posts: 85,319
- And1: 40,062
- Joined: May 23, 2001
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
DS17 wrote:In the last decade, what are the top three teams that SHOULD have won a championship based on talent alone- but didn’t.
Here’s what I think
1) 2019 -76ers (dude. They literally had four all stars and a bunch of quality players ontop of that...)
2) 2018- rockets ... this was a GREAT team.
3) 2013 lakers?
4) 2020 clippers?
What do you think?
The 2013 Lakers were terrible, so definitely not them.
OKC is the best answer iMO. Lost in the finals once, the WC finals 3 times and were snakebit with injuries at least 3 other seasons.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
April 14th, 2019.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
- lars_rosenberg
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,267
- And1: 3,776
- Joined: Aug 15, 2014
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
73-win Warriors when they let the Cavs come back down 3-1 and again 2019 Warriors when everybody got injured.
It's unbelievable the Warriors haven't at least 3-peated.
It's unbelievable the Warriors haven't at least 3-peated.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,406
- And1: 1,343
- Joined: Oct 16, 2004
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
2001ish Kings and 2000ish Blazers would have beaten all those teams pretty easily IMO. 2013 Lakers weren't good. Had to make a big run just to get into the playoffs
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 172
- And1: 494
- Joined: Dec 25, 2020
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
1994 Knicks. fierce defensive team.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,875
- And1: 7,209
- Joined: Jul 28, 2017
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
1987-1988 Pistons
2004-2005 Pistons
2005-2006 Pistons
Yeah that's about it.
2004-2005 Pistons
2005-2006 Pistons
Yeah that's about it.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,020
- And1: 4,562
- Joined: Sep 28, 2014
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
2016 Spurs deserve a mention. Prime Kawhi and LMA with the big 3 still there. Still don't understand how they lost to OKC.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,953
- And1: 1,565
- Joined: Nov 22, 2015
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
lars_rosenberg wrote:73-win Warriors when they let the Cavs come back down 3-1 and again 2019 Warriors when everybody got injured.
It's unbelievable the Warriors haven't at least 3-peated.
The 2016 Warriors should be the winner of this thread by default due to 73 wins unless people believe that was a fluke.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,953
- And1: 1,565
- Joined: Nov 22, 2015
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
DS17 wrote:In the last decade, what are the top three teams that SHOULD have won a championship based on talent alone- but didn’t.
Here’s what I think
1) 2019 -76ers (dude. They literally had four all stars and a bunch of quality players ontop of that...)
2) 2018- rockets ... this was a GREAT team.
3) 2013 lakers?
4) 2020 clippers?
What do you think?
The Sixers had two all stars. Embiid and Butler. Ben Simmons is garbage and Tobias Harris is vastly overrated. Simmons falls in the overrated category as well.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,970
- And1: 6,627
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
- 76ciology
- RealGM
- Posts: 65,862
- And1: 26,866
- Joined: Jun 06, 2002
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
A couple of recent Warriors squad for sure.
73 win team and the 2019 Warriors.
73 win team and the 2019 Warriors.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,124
- And1: 4,818
- Joined: Aug 29, 2006
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
I don't think the 2013 Lakers qualify. They underachieved like crazy, and for sure were expected to make the finals based on their talent, but if I remember correctly that 2013 Heat team was still the slight favorite, even on paper.
The 2004 Lakers belong here.
So do the 2019 Warriors. (I know I know injuries etc)
I think you need to throw in the 2021 Nets if we are ignoring injuries, though I suppose my 2013 Lakers argument is valid here; even at full strength the Nets weren't considered heavy favorites. They were neck and neck with the Lakers.
The 2019 Warriors and 2004 Lakers however, looked a whole level above their competition on paper. By far the two most purely talented teams if you consider star power and the way key players performed a year prior.
The 2004 Lakers belong here.
So do the 2019 Warriors. (I know I know injuries etc)
I think you need to throw in the 2021 Nets if we are ignoring injuries, though I suppose my 2013 Lakers argument is valid here; even at full strength the Nets weren't considered heavy favorites. They were neck and neck with the Lakers.
The 2019 Warriors and 2004 Lakers however, looked a whole level above their competition on paper. By far the two most purely talented teams if you consider star power and the way key players performed a year prior.
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
- Bornstellar
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,606
- And1: 22,949
- Joined: Mar 05, 2018
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
2012 Spurs. 20 straight wins up 2-0 before getting backdoor swept by OKC in the WCF. Some extremely questionable officiating in Game 6
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
- Bornstellar
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,606
- And1: 22,949
- Joined: Mar 05, 2018
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
illuminati666 wrote:2016 Spurs deserve a mention. Prime Kawhi and LMA with the big 3 still there. Still don't understand how they lost to OKC.
Some questionable officiating of course (Waiters pushing Manu while out of bounds at the end of game 2), and Pops horrible decision to let West and Diaw share the court together against Adams and Kanter. SA got obliterated on the glass
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
- UcanUwill
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,745
- And1: 36,139
- Joined: Aug 07, 2011
-
Re: Best team that could have won it all and didn’t?
If we are talking about singular years, sure, lots of choices, if we talking about whole saga, Early 00s Kings and mid 00s Pacers.