br7knicks wrote:i know why. mpharris, you gave me your 9 man rotation, but i only have 11 guys on your roster. let me look at team page
If you using 2k 20 you probably don't have my rookies
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

br7knicks wrote:i know why. mpharris, you gave me your 9 man rotation, but i only have 11 guys on your roster. let me look at team page
mpharris36 wrote:br7knicks wrote:i know why. mpharris, you gave me your 9 man rotation, but i only have 11 guys on your roster. let me look at team page
If you using 2k 20 you probably don't have my rookies

Depalma2002 wrote:Kind of an unfair advantage giving the Spurs players the power of invisibility
Depalma2002 wrote:Kind of an unfair advantage giving the Spurs players the power of invisibility
br7knicks wrote:mpharris36 wrote:t.Buzzard wrote:.
give me 10 mins or so to set up your teams, and i will run you both next

3toheadmelo wrote:2010 wrote:Melo has been humbledSpoiler:

bishnykfan wrote:TRANSACTION
The Chicago Bulls have officially resigned Montrezl Harrell for $65/3 years.

bringbackhoffa wrote:I did like this system, I think having to be within $10 of the next bid to even get feedback on what it would take to beat an offer pushed you to be a bit more aggressive with your earlier offers on players you were keen on. I think after the initial first PM you kind of got a good sense of who will be attainable and who you should just move on from.
One thing which caught me by surprise as it was not the case last year was that dollar values for bird right free agents and cap space remaining for those teams signing bird right free agents was unknown. Caused a bit of a deviation as those teams knew other teams cap space availability while teams such as myself who had their cap space visible were operating blindly when you knew you were likely going up against one of those teams for a certain free agent but could not determine what their max bid was while they knew your max bid.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app

bishnykfan wrote:Now that we are through the first week of FA, a couple of thoughts:
2020 FA week 1
90 total players signed
$8982 total spent
$100 average per player, as
2021 FA week 1
82 total players signed
$6481 total spent
$79 average per player
Couple of things in my opinion are the reason for the differences. First off, Booker was signed for $2590 by himself last year. Take away the top two players by year (Booker in 2020 and Siakam's $1000 in 2021) and the numbers are incredibly similar. Taking those two players away you have an average of $72 spent in 2020 compared to $68 in 2021. So, as far as money spent, the main difference between this year and last year was that the top overall FA last year was much more desirable and therefore got paid substantially more bringing up the average money for the entire FA class.
In general, I think that the two classes of FA were similar outside of Booker which is why the numbers are close. Other reasons IMO why the numbers were slightly down were the number of one year deals handed out this year in anticipation of the reset next offseason. This season, 34% of all FA deals were one year deals compared to only 26% of last seasons deals. Of those one year deals, only two last year were for $50+ (Wall and T. Young). This year there were six $50+ deals of one year (Wall and T. Young again, plus Griffin, Howard, Gafford and Hardaway). So overall, even though the FA classes were overall fairly similar other than the very top player, the teams seemed to be a bit more cautious in committing long term money considering next years FA class.
So, my overall question is, how did people view the new FA system? I have my own thoughts on it that I will share later but wanted to hear other peoples thoughts first.


