stormi wrote:BullyKing wrote:Negrodamus wrote:
CJ is probably his actual value, but we want to get his ripoff value of years past where teams believed he was fixable. I regret to inform you that what CJ McCollum brings to the table is much more valuable in today's game than what Ben does. CJ is also a 28ppg, 6apg, and 5rpg player when not with Lillard. Now imagine a Lillard level gravity player but in the post. I think with him being a low impact athlete, his injury risks are lowered and he has decent longevity moving forward. He's in the middle of his prime and could cross that 30ppg threshold with Embiid.
My guess, however, is that the Blazers are willing to part with CJ and the Sixers are demanding Lillard, so the conversation is dying there.
T'Wolves feel like the likely option because they are willing to overpay and give up every pick and swap for Ben. The key will be finding that third team to give us a star right now.
There's nothing good about McCollum. He's basically Tobias. We have almost a decade of evidence that you're not winning anything with CJ McCollum as your second best player. The only thing trading Simmons for McCollum would accomplish is that we'd be Portland in 2 years with Joel demanding out.
Disgree with CJ = Tobias. CJ is a 90th percentile isolation scorer, and an elite offensive weapon. He has more 40 point playoff games than Tobias has 30 point playoff games, and that's playing alongside a usage monster in Dame Lillard. He has his warts for sure, he's a sieve defensively, but I think he's talented enough to be a 3rd option on a championship team. Tobias Harris is a roleplayer.
But yeah I wouldn't ever consider Ben for CJ in a million years. Timelines are way off.
McConnell is a below scorer from an efficiency standpoint. So he's inefficient on offense and decidedly below average on defense. He is also older and makes a ton of money. Why is this someone anyone would be interested in acquiring?
















